You are asking for exceptions made for so called WN fags. Why else would you make the topic, then argue for it. Your showing is more telling than the telling

My responding as an individual is also SF policy, and WN belief. I can answer collectively as can any member of SF, when stating policy, or any WN when stating ideology. Further onto that, there have been multiple massive conversations on this topic, here on SF, and it has been done to finite detail.

I'm not the one lacking brain cells here dear.

Fags are not WN, no matter how "manly". Their support is meaningless. They'll be dead in a generation, why do they matter? They have no progeny to pass their beliefs to, no family to build up, no society to be part of. They are a one hit wonder. Who cares about a one generation one percent opinion?