Friendzone: Guy v girl edition
Guy:
Told that women desire sweet, caring, loving romantic guys and that friendships build and develop solid relationships. He follows this and get friendzoned repeatedly while the women go for chad and players who just use them as cum deposits. When he points the hypocrisy out, he's scapegoated as "a manipulative asshole who was "pretending" to be nice just to fuck her; typically by frustrated women who failed to snag Chad in a ltr. He goes home to LDAR.
Girl:
After friendzoning the guy that actually cares about her and in an attempt to snag Chad in an ltr. She'll agree to be his fuck buddy, hoping her sex is great enough to get him to commit. In the beginning she'll pretend to be happy to be his booty call but soon she'll start hinting and demanding they do stuff outside the bedroom. When Chad reminds her what they are, she runs off to cry to her friends and whiteknights that he was "using" her for sex. They all call him a jerk and an asshole and that she's special and he never deserved her. Chad doesn't care that much because he quickly adds a new girl to his harem.
Conclusion: No matter the situation, men will always be blamed when things don't work. The difference is being physically attractive and popular will always get you women no matter what.
21 comments
You get friendzoned because the women don't want a romantic relationship with you for some reason, but still wants to be friends with you. You should respect her wishes. Getting a girlfriends is hard, and you can't exspect to always be succesful. There's plenty of fish in the sea.
When he points the hypocrisy out, he's scapegoated as "a manipulative asshole who was "pretending" to be nice just to fuck her
Going by what I've seen written by incels in their own stinking cesspits that's less a scapegoat and more exactly what you were doing and you repeatedly state anyone who says they're not doing that is a liar because why else would any man even talk to a woman?
And Elliot Rodger - wealthy, pretty-boy, son of a director - would complain about your conclusion, then murder you because he would think you're the reason he couldn't get laid in life along with basically every human being on the face of the planet but himself. Was he popular? After a fashion, sure. Lots of people wanted to get to know him but he was far too much of an asshole to actually hang around with and he hated the company of others.
Just... how man? How do they keep lying to themselves like this? Even within the confines of their own little echo chambers the evidence is just glaring. Right there in front of them. Short of a serious mental illness there ought not to be any excuse for this idiocy. And if it is mental illness that drives them then why has there not been a serious movement to study and quarantine this disturbingly common, highly visible, relentlessly vocal, and utterly genuine threat to the public?
I hate the way the word "friendzone" has been hijacked and corrupted.
When I was in high school, back around the turn of the millennium, we used the term for the situation where a guy STARTED OUT being genuine friends with a girl, then along the line, he DEVELOPED romantic feelings for her, which were not reciprocated and the girl wanted to keep the relationship platonic. The general consensus was that it sucked and was completely baffling, but was not something to get angry about.
No matter the conclusion, Incels are Incels precisely because they refuse to take responsibility for their own shortcomings, and prefer to whine and blame someone else because they're not willing to put in the effort to better themselves. They think they should be entitled to a woman, whereas even Chad works at it.
... he's scapegoated as "a manipulative asshole who was "pretending" to be nice just to fuck her...
As far as I can gather from this that is exactly what you are doing, and that is exactly what you are.
Having been "friendzoned" by two girls that I was into as a teenager really wasn't bad. Sure they rejected me. Sure I wish I could have been more than friends with both (at separate times) but we kept in touch after we graduated high school. One sadly died in a fire trying to save loved ones. The other is happily married. While I mourn one, I'm glad we could be friends that were life long and she had been one of my best friends. The other I am happy for and wouldn't ever change it for the world.
When I hear incels whine about being "friendzoned" they should feel lucky to even be friendzoned with their treatment of others. One wanted to ruin a happy relationship. Simply because of his cruelty. Incels are responsible for being incel. Until they realize this and change this they will always be alone. And with their attitude they deserve to be
I have feelings for one of my best friends too (DDoD, are you my twin?). Have had for years.
Why on earth would this be a terrible situation? Sure, I'd like it if it was mutual and something could be done about it. But we're still friends, and that means a lot to me.
Why moan and bitch and scream and wallow?
The more of their rants I see, the more I'm certain that incels are the lowest form of life on this planet.
@Passerby[quote]Just... how man? How do they keep lying to themselves like this? Even within the confines of their own little echo chambers the evidence is just glaring. Right there in front of them. Short of a serious mental illness there ought not to be any excuse for this idiocy.
You're a veteran of this site, you've seen for yourself just how easily faith can sabotage reason; when you are utterly convinced that you are Right and that whatever you do is Right, it becomes very easy to ignore all evidence to the contrary, no matter how overwhelming. This made perfect sense during the stone age, but I fear that our refusal to improve ourselves along with our tools and our environments will prove to be our undoing.
I am already trying to keep myself from submitting too many, but okay, I will try harder.
@Thinking Allowed:
After reading you and your fellow incels' hateful rants about women, you'd be lucky if any woman actually friendzoned you and wasn't totally repelled by your creepy personalities.
And yes, you do pretend to be a "nice guy" just so you can get sex. I've seen the quotes on this site, questions like, "Why should I even talk to a woman if I'm not going to get sex?" Pretending to be a nice guy just to get into a woman's panties is somehow worse than a "Chad" getting into a purely sexual relationship with a woman who wants more than just sex.
Don't worry bud, if women really only dated "jerks", you and your incel brethren would have no problem getting a girlfriend.
And "Nice Guys"TM are manipulative assholes. At least the "Chad" boogeyman you keep whining about is up front about his intentions.
For the millionth time, there's a reason why "Stacey and Ashley" go for "Chad"; they're douchebags too. And if you'd take them down off the pedestal you have them on because they're "hot" and you're just as shallow as you always whine women are, you'd realize this too.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
