EarlyCall #fundie

EarlyCall #fundie bibleforums.org

What you refuse to do is to acknowledge intelligent design when it comes to all of creation. You look around you and see these things and can't help but admit to the intelligence of their design. Ok, maybe you can, but not honestly I don't beleive. Chance just isn't that good, and if you disagree, take your entire life's savings to the nearest casino and put it all down at the roulette wheel and let's see just how much you trust chance to be in your favor then.

<p>What the real problem here is that people refuse to acknowledge God, therefore something else, anything else, we'll think of something, had to have been behind creation. Nevermind that it shows all the markings of great intelligence behind it. We can refuse to admit this and move on with our theories and claims.

<p>I'm afraid my commonsense overrides this nonsense!

9 comments

old comment by Justanotheratheist

We have all the evidence in the world to prove that you fundies have no fucking idea how evolution works, so why should we take your particular waffling seriously?

If you could at least understand a couple of basic concepts, it would be a good start. First and foremost, you will neverf get a handle on evolution if you persist with the patently false premise that the earth is 6000 years old. Second, the corollary of this is that evolution is a very, very slow process (because cats don't suddenly become whales, or whatever you cretins seem to believe should happen.)

Thirdly, such diverse phenomena as earthquakes, cancer, hurricanes and Alzheimer's (to name just a small handful) are not evidence of intelligence in design. If somebody did indeed "create" the world and everything in it, then I for one wouldn't let them build a bookshelf using one short plank and two bricks.

All of which means that my common sense not merely overrides your nonsense, it wallops it into the middle of the next solar system.

old comment by Swede

Very few life-forms are that intelligently designed when you look closely. Why create a gene for producing Vitamin C and then turn it off in Great Apes? Why create an eye without blind spots in octopuses and then create a poorer eye for mammals with the blind spots?

Chance is just a strawman. If I had enough coins to play the roulette wheel for a couple of million years, then I would probably win the grand slam eventually. You were saying...?

If God came down and presented himself I would not refuse to acknowledge him, I promise you.
There was no creation, and evolution is not about the origin of life, but the adaptation to changing environments.
See above re "great intelligence behind it".

There is no common sense in cdesign proponentsists, it's just nonsense.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

"What you refuse to do is to acknowledge intelligent design when it comes to all of creation."

(*HONK-HONK! A-ROOGAH A-ROOGAH! Plays Reveille*)

Attention, Attention! This is your wake-up call, EarlyCall. Seems you are several months, nay, several years too late to consider this:

What you refuse to do is acknowledge that Kitzmiller vs. Dover - specifically the decision by Conservative Christian Judge John E. Jones III in late 2005 - completely annihilates your argument. The precedent set by this case, and it's implications for Constitutional Law, renders the entire Creationist argument (via 'Intelligent Design') moot. As a result of KvD, Evolution is fact. Creationism is lies. The law says so.

Your own common sense Scripture - via a little thing called Romans 13:1-5 - says that you must abide by, nay, obey that law. Or you're going to Hell! >:D

EarlyCall #fundie bibleforums.org

9 comments

Confused?