“1. The greatest modern thinkers, including Isaac Newton, Louis Pasteur, Bernhard Riemann, Alexander Hamilton, John von Neumann, and Kurt Godel, were devoted to the Bible.”
And if we subjectively find atheists and call THEM the greatest thinkers, is that a refutation or just equally obvious bullshit?
“2. These thinkers would not be attracted to anything that had a logical flaw.”
A number of con men have proven quite successful in grifting Christains by pretending to be Christains. Scams that should be identified from a mile away go right past their critical thought filters because they feel they can trust a ‘fellow Christain.’ People don’t always evaluate every idea the same way.
“3. The Bible must therefore be more logical than the alternative.”
Trump is an obvious con man, liar, rapist, adulterer, thief, and takes teh Lord’s Name In Vain. And Bible-believers think he’s the chosen one. This conclusion does not follow your first two claims.
“4. What is more logical is more likely to be true.”
Utter bullshit. Claims can be quite logical, and internally sound, but at odds with reality. Still logical, but not real.
“5. Thus God is more likely to exist than the alternative.”
Not a good conclusion considering 4 is bullshit.
