Tea Party Comission #racist

Tea Party Comission #racist topix.com

WHY BLACKS HATE THE US CONSTITUTION? read on
The Founders were all White, Brilliant and smart. They created a Constitution for the White Children of Adam. There were no black founders. Our Founders considered Blacks beasts of burden.
If they had intended to include blacks they would have included blacks at the Constitutional Convention. In fact, they declared blacks as sub-human in the Constitution itself.

The US Constitution says Blacks are only 2/5 human. The Founders knew long ago that Blacks are Sub- Human apes..I say nothing. The US Constitution does.
Questions:
Are we trying to make Humans out of Apes?
Why do we allow them a Black Caucus?
Why are they in Congress or in Higher Offices?
Why are they in Law Enforcement?
Why are we allow they to have Black History Month?
Why are we allowing them to get away with Affirmative Action?
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AFFIRMS BLACKS ARE 100% INFERIOR TO WHITES INTELLECTUALLY.
THEIR RIDE ENDS NOW!!!

29 comments

old comment by dionysus

The Founders were all White, Brilliant and smart.

Brilliant AND smart? Were they also intelligent too?

They created a Constitution for the White Children of Adam

And then they realized that for a country to work it can't just give all rights to a single man and his kids.

There were no black founders.

Really? I'd have thought that rainy and cold England would have been FULL of darker-skinned individuals.

Our Founders considered Blacks beasts of burden.
If they had intended to include blacks they would have included blacks at the Constitutional Convention. In fact, they declared blacks as sub-human in the Constitution itself.

The US Constitution says Blacks are only 2/5 human.

Maybe, but rational people don't treat the founding fathers as infallible like your white uber-nationalist Christian cult.

Are we trying to make Humans out of Apes?

All humans are apes.

Why do we allow them a Black Caucus?
Why are they in Congress or in Higher Offices?

It's called DEMOCRACY.

Why are they in Law Enforcement?

Because they're willing to put their lives on the line and go after dangerous criminals. Yes, they're even willing to protect assholes like you.

Why are we allow they to have Black History Month?

I don't think we SHOULD have a Black History Month; we should automatically consider the achievements of black people as a normal part of American history. However, because so many people don't consider their achievements as part of regular history, they need a special month.

Why are we allowing them to get away with Affirmative Action?

I don't think there should be affirmative action either, but again, it's because idiots refused to hire them because of their skin color that it even got implemented.

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AFFIRMS BLACKS ARE 100% INFERIOR TO WHITES INTELLECTUALLY.
THEIR RIDE ENDS NOW!!!

NO, IT AFFIRMS THAT RACISTS WERE DENYING THEM OPPORTUNITIES!!!!!!!!!! I WROTE THAT ALL IN CAPS AND ENDED IT WITH A BUNCH OF POINTLESS EXCLAMATION POINTS, THEREFORE I MUST BE RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!^infinity

old comment by

So what about Abraham Lincoln? Y'know, that widely-respected fella who stood up for black people.

And by the way, it's been long proven that there are nowhere near enough physiological differences, to say nothing of biological differences, for black people to be a different species. I mean, people of different races can breed and produce viable offspring with 100% human DNA, so obviously interacial couplings aren't producing hybrid creatures.

As for Black History month, it's there to help fill some of the holes in the historical narrative. Hopefully there'll be a time when it's no longer needed because the achievements of black people will taught along with the achievements of everyone else.

old comment by Kat

Like the previous posts before me state, the 3/5ths (not 2/5 dumba**) rule was written so that bigger slave states could not claim slaves in order to have a larger body of representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. As a matter of fact, this is what the clause actually states:
(found in Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3 of the United States Constitution)

"Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."

As you can read and read again, there is no mention of the terms "black", "negro", or your favorite, the N-word in that clause. It only talked about "bounded" people. So when the United States abolished slavery, this rule became obsolite.

Oh yeah, I CAN SCREAM ON THE INTERNET AS WELL, BUT IT DOESN'T MAKE MY POINT ANY MORE VALID.

@FSTDT - Do these kind of posts get you down? I have recently found a new blog called Morons With Signs. It shows people of both ends of the political spectrum, but recently has been capturing signs at the tea parties for everyone's amusement.
Here is the website:
http://moronswithsigns.blogspot.com/
Enjoy!

old comment by Mister J

YT: Well, it's not as if your comments have any merit to them to begin with. You come onto a website dedicated to making fun of and trolling racists, write some epithet-strewn sentence condemning an entire race for some perceived collective behaviour (more often than not, a rehashing of a long-held stereotype), declare yourself right, and then leave. Rather than having to debunk all your asinine points (as easy as it is) it's easier to troll you in kind.

You want to be taken seriously? Grow the hell up, stop throwing the n-word around like it's going out of style and actually back up your claims. Or at least type more than one line. Your call, really.

old comment by NoriMori

@dionysus:

"Why are we allow they to have Black History Month?
|
I don't think we SHOULD have a Black History Month; we should automatically consider the achievements of black people as a normal part of American history. However, because so many people don't consider their achievements as part of regular history, they need a special month."

Exactly. It's part of pushing up against the Caucasian "invisible backpack". In order for everyone to be truly equal, white people need to realize what they take for granted, and we need to get to a point where everyone (or no one) can take those things for granted. And it's the same with feminism. That's why, until things really even out, white people and men are gonna start feeling like THEY'RE the ones whose rights are being infringed upon.

I'm on the Diversity Committee at our school, and we were discussing what to do for Black History Month. The teacher in charge of our Diversity Committee is black, and after she mentioned that Asian History Month is is May, she told us that a student in one of her classes said, "When's White History Month?" The teacher replied, "January, March, April, June, July, August, September, October, November, and December." And it's true. (The student didn't really get it, though.)

In an ideal world, when people think of [North] American history, they'll consider all races equally. But until then, we have to remind them with History Months.

Tea Party Comission #racist topix.com

29 comments

Confused?