[Topic: Is it okay for a men to wear necklaces?]
Since many dictionaries consider a necklace to be two things: (1) adornment about the neck and (2) worn typically by females, we can assume there is an effeminate connotation to wearing a necklace. While this may not always be true, the Bible takes such a strong stand against the effeminate, that we should, as a matter of practice, stay as far away from the confusion as possible. Therefore, MEN should not wear necklaces for the purpose of adornment.
52 comments
Yup. You're implying wearing necklaces makes a man gay. I say to you, sir, that you...are brain dead.
Might be a shameless plug, but hey, it's liberal. Xanga.com/Coleslaw_From_Hell
Wow.
Men shouldn't wear necklaces because they're effeminate and "ZOMG TEH BIBLE IS LYKE, SO AGAINST THAT!!!!!!11111oneone"
They're actually debating (or, I'm assuming, all agreeing with Randy that necklaces are teh ebbils) about men wearing necklaces like it matters.
Wow .
So apparently the bible is the flawless, immutable word of god, except when it's too confusing, in which case true believers should defer to the dictionary.
Hey, Randy-4-Teens, the majority of people in the US are female. By your logic, because being an American is a majority female trait, it is thus effeminate. So I've some nice land in Saudi Arabia that I'd like to sell to you, as I am sure you are now determined to shirk your effeminate American identity.
Now, badass bible fashion rule number 1 is "What chicks dig, adversaries will exploit" warning of how an opponent could choke you with it in a street fight.
Unfortunately, he's talking about the real bible, which holds much less persuasive power over my clothing choices.
No, I think Bluegrassgirl's answer was much better. It was something like, "um, what are lyke the two words that are in necklace? Neck and lace so what sort of guy would want to wear lace around his neck. My dad calls guys who wear necklaces sissy boys LOL!!!"
So necklace crosses are out? Well, I suppose it would, not just for be effeminate, but also for being "cATHOLIC."
OK. So. If fashion changes and by the 2020s all the cool guys are wearing necklaces, and none of the cool chicks are, so that necklaces are associated with masculinity ... then it would be OK to wear a necklace, yes?
Remind us about that unchanging, inerrant Bible of yours, again ...
What the hell? Randy, have you ever been to church? You are a fraud. I have been to numerous religions places of worship (Lutheran,Catholic,Baptist,Methodist, Episcopal,Presbyterian,Brethren, Church of God, even a synagogue). In EVERY single one of those places of worship, the religious leader wore a cross, crucifix, or "Star of David". Oh I get it, you are above all these mere ministers of the word, you are the "Gospel According to Randy" with your made up excuses for Biblical bigotry. You better hope God has a sense of humor, or maybe you are proof that God has a sense of humor.PS I'd watch who I called effeminate even among ministers. I know a Lutheran who won a silver star in the 82nd airborne, a Presbyterian vicar who teaches judo parttime(his hobby and darngood protection for inner-city kids) and a Methodist who hunts to feed the poor(and is a hell of a shot, forgive me Tom, for the phrase) in his small rural area.
For the most part I think necklaces are a nuisance, but I wore a simple cross necklace for years, until it accidentally went down the drain. But back then I was one of them heretic Cathlicks, and now I'm a borderline-atheist with delusions of agnosticism, so I guess I don't count...
That's funny you know. I've seen a lot of priests and ministers and such of all denominations. They were all wearing collars (3 a band of leather, etc worn round the neck by an animal, especially a dog.) but I could swear they were speaking in actual words, and not just "woof woof! woof woof!"
And just what's wrong with being like a female (effeminate)?
Oh right, I forgot, god hates our worthless female guts - despite having created us - and gave us to men as their property, to use and abuse as they saw fit. It's all our fault, too, for having the effrontery to exist while female.
Go suck a cock, Randy, and stay the fuck off the internet. We will all be much happier, including you.
“Since …(observation) we can assume”
First, that’s a CONCLUSION, not an assumption.
Second, it’s a piss poor conclusion because numbered dictionary definitions are separate, not cumulative.
Third, ‘typically’ is not ‘exclusively.’
Plenty of men wear shark’s teeth or bear claws around their necks and it’s not effeminate.
"While this may not always be true, the Bible takes such a strong stand against the effeminate,”
But nowhere does it say necklaces are or risk being effeminate. That’s your piss poor logic.
"that we should, as a matter of practice, stay as far away from the confusion as possible.”
No one else is confused, Bubbles. Every man in combat wears dogtags around their neck, and there’s little more manly-macho-tough than combat. except for the women in combat, i guess.
“Therefore, MEN should not wear necklaces for the purpose of adornment.”
Dude, if your MANLINESS comes from hwo others see you, rather than how you see yourself, just pack it in already.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.