When you bring in immigrants in groups other than Europeans, high-Caste Indians or East Asians, you’re bringing in more crime and the kind of personalities and random street confrontations that comes from a population with more criminal tendencies – these same people who want to shut you up if you say anything unflattering about them.

You’re bringing in bloc voting on the basis of endless and never-satisfied grievances and the gibs. The result being that things like tax reform and cutting back regulations never gets dealt with, and the “lobbyists” or “deep state” or “career bureaucrats” or whatever you want to call them just pile on the regulations. Because nobody is voting on that basis; there’s no constituency for “cutting regulations” because all anyone is voting for is their free stuff. When was the last time you’ve heard a democrat, let alone a black democrat, make “cutting regulation” a big part of his platform?

And to top it all off, you’re bringing in low IQs and low employment and low wages, which results in bigger financial problems. Cities with a lot of blacks, like countries with a lot of blacks, face constant and chronic financial problems. Cities with a lot of Latin Americans, like their countries, are better than Africa, but still an enormous downgrade from Europe; inner city LA has more crime, more poverty, more regulations and taxes than white rural Nebraska; and the people there are less intellectual and are more likely to lash out at you if you start deconstructing their shibboleths.

If you want nuance, give-and-take and intellectual engagement, go to rural North Dakota. If you want pig-brained indoctrination, chanting and bloc-politics, go to San Francisco and Stanford. Or Mexico City or Kinshasa or Cairo.

East Asians tend to do very well so long as it is Europeans making the rules. The more East Asians “become who they are”, deviating from the western values embedded in their governments, and instead of investing in profitable industries but focus on propping up moribund community-corporations, the longer Japan will continue to stagnate with their consensus politics and consensus economy.

Regarding Slavs, I have more work to do. Why are their countries crappy? Their IQs aren’t especially low, and the Czechs, Poles and Russians are basically on par with Western Europe. It’s possible that they are like East Asians, in that they do relatively okay so long as it’s Western Europeans making the rules, but once in charge of their own countries, certain slavic pathologies become recursive. Or perhaps the Western v. Eastern European differences are all totally environmental – but I am of course heavily biased against that possibility.

I may be a big-tent white nationalist and so the idea of slavic equality appeals to that pan-European sentiment, the fact is that the slavs have been behind the west for a long time, and just saying “communism” begs the question of why communism appealed to them, and answering that with “because Russia was poorer than the west” just begs the question as to why Russia was poorer than the west, even if we assume that Russia being poorer is a satisfactory answer for why communism appealed to them more.