There are science theorists that believe every White person on this earth walked out of Africa. If that is true then there would be African DNA in every White person alive on earth wouldn't it?
Also there could be White species of human in Africa and an African negro species.
Surely we are not to believe that every White human that walked out of Africa walked out of black negro DNA.
Of coarse I don't even believe in the 'everyone walked out of Africa theory, and also do not by the theory that all the continents were once joined but broke off and migrated clear around the world.
But I could believe that a White race once inhabited Africa a very long time ago, and that would be African DNA, but it wouldn't mean negroid DNA. It would be DNA that originated in and on the African continent.
There are primates of many kinds on many land masses around the world. Some have none. Are we to believe that the monkeys on these wide ranging spread-out land masses simply drifted around the world carrying these different species of monkeys while these drifting land masses broke off from the Giant land mass base of Africa? That would take many millions of years yet there are different species of monkeys around the world while some land masses have absolutely no primates on them.
Additionally, since the scientific theorists actually believe that every White on this earth walked out of Africa, then by all rights Africa was once the ancestrial homeland of every White alive today and if mexicans can claim resettlement of the U.S., then it is only fair that Whites retake command of Africa, our anchient historical lands and partake in natural rescources for the benefit of the White race. Get off my homeland Negro!
12 comments
Wrong, dude. No scientist says white people walked out of Africa. They say (as far as I'm aware, but someone else correct me if I'm wrong) that people walked out of Africa and then one group of them in the Caucasus Mountains became white later on.
We don't know what color/s the first groups of people who left Africa were, and nobody really cares.
News flash - Chinese, European, and US interests Are fighting over African resources, and the Africans are getting screwed to a degree that should please you very much.
"That would take many millions of years yet there are different species of monkeys around the world while some land masses have absolutely no primates on them."
What? WHAT? That's PERFECTLY fucking explained by continental drift you fucking moron!
"then it is only fair that Whites retake command of Africa, our anchient historical lands and partake in natural rescources for the benefit of the White race. Get off my homeland Negro!"
First off, it's spelled 'ancient'. Second, by your own admission it's the homeland of black Africans too, which means they have no reason to leave. You are separated from Africa being your homeland by about 75,000 years, which means you have no claim.
1) White people didn't walk out of Africa, but their ancestors did. Go back 40,000 or so years and every white person's ancestors eventually turn into black people. Modern science is now showing evidence that white skin in humans is probably a trait that appeared only between 6,000-20,000 years ago.
6) What "land masses" (I assume you mean "continents") don't have any primates other than Antarctica?
8) "then by all rights Africa was once the ancestrial homeland of every White alive today"
By that "logic" every black person alive today has the right to claim Europe as an ancestral homeland since the first modern Homo sapiens to live in Europe were black people who migrated out of Africa into Europe across the Mediterranean and through the Near East. That was who inhabited prehistoric Europe for most of modern Homo sapiens' existence there, alongside the Neanderthals and into the Neolithic Revolution. For most of their existence they probably looked like lighter-skinned black people with looser curls and wavy hair. Probably wasn't until around Neolithic times, or near the end of the Paleolithic, that they developed white skin and straighter hair. They most likely got blonde and red hair and blue eyes from mixing with migrant ethnic groups coming in from nearby North Africa, Mediterranean Europe and the Near East. That's where the genes from those traits are believed to have developed. Green eyes likely arrived from Asiatic and Turkic migrants in prehistoric time and brown hair from Asiatic peoples who turned into white people in prehistoric Eastern Europe.
@aebars - Correct.
@nazani14 - We don't know for sure but evidence and our knowledge of human evolution suggests they were probably dark-skinned if not black. Most likely black-skinned since black skin was a trait that evolved in Homo Erectus, Homo Heidelbergensis or archaic Homo sapiens (the version that no longer exists) as a response to our Hominid ancestors gradually losing their ape coat of fur/hair. Our original ancestor, Australopithecus, is most closely related to the chimpanzee. Chimps have pinkish skin under their hair. As our Hominid ancestors lost their body hair their delicate pink skin was left exposed to the harsh African sun. African hair texture ("coiled", "very curly", "kinky" or "nappy" hair as people call it) developed in response to climate change during Hominid development. The coiled hair follicles of African hair texture acts as a baffle for the pathway of UV rays to the skin. That trait developed to give the exposed human skin and scalp more protection. Later in Homo sapiens evolution black skin likely developed as an evolutionary adaptation to protect Hominid skin as their bodies became more even more hairless (even with the kinky hair), leaving the skin exposed. Black skin contains more melanin which better handles UV rays and uses some of the sunlight in chemosynthesis to produce Vitamin D and other beneficial products. The black skin made the African hair texture become less necessary but has stayed in African gene pools as a leftover trait. The African populations that left Africa came from a region (Ethiopia) where many people evolved curly, wavy or straight hair. This hair texture proliferated outside of Africa because those respective hair textures are more beneficial in other climates around the world than the African hair texture. The African hair texture was kept in most populations of people who still live in African-esque climates outside of Africa. Like some Pacific Islanders and Australian Aborigines.
"If that is true then there would be African DNA in every White person alive on earth wouldn't it? " - Yes, and there is.
"Also there could be White species of human in Africa and an African negro species." - Whites and Blacks are not different species.
" then it is only fair that Whites retake command of Africa, our anchient historical lands and partake in natural rescources for the benefit of the White race. Get off my homeland Negro!" - please go trying and help rid the worldof people like you.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
