I disagree with same-sex marriage for many reasons. Some of those reasons are:
1. There is no science to support the born that way theory.
IMO, changing the definition of marriage based on a changeable sexual behavior is social suicide.
35 comments
IMO, changing the definition of marriage based on a changeable sexual behavior is social suicide.
1. Wrong, and irrelevant anyway.
I disagree with interracial marriage for many reasons. Some of those reasons are:
1. There is no science to support the born that way theory.
IMO, changing the definition of marriage based on a changeable sexual behavior is social suicide.
There is no science to support the born that way theory.
Actually, there are two things: (1) a correlation between a man being gay and having a gay uncle on the mother's side and (2) a correlation between being a gay man and having older brothers.
One hypothesis is that the male fetus may be affected by the mother's body chemistry, and that the effect is triggered or magnified by prior male pregnancies.
Every now and then I just get so puzzled about why so many people care so pathologically about what consenting adults do sexually.
To all those people: Who fucking cares? Get over it now! Get life! Fuck off!
1. Fuck you.
1. Yes there is proof your gender identity and sexuality is hardwired. Case of twin boys. After a botched circumcision on one of them, the boy was surgically changed to have female pubic area, and the parents were told to raise him as a her.
Guess what? It didn't work. "She" always knew something was wrong, and when 'she' was finally told she was a he, everything clicked. But the damage had been done both physically and mentally, from being and living as the wrong gender.
There is no such thing as a 'ex-gay'. They can choose to live a lie, and pretend, but they are still gay.
3 - Okay, give Charlene a couple of years and i bet she will be fucking women behind her husbands back, just like most other ex-gays.
"ex-gays" are just brainwashed and are eitehr forced to marry someone of the opposite sex, and/or live as a celibate for the rest of their life (or until they break and start having unsafe sex behind their partners back, thereby spreading STDs)
Bitch, Miss Cothran herself said that if the devil wanted to tempt her, he wouldn't do it with a linebacker.
She's still gay, asshole, even if she's not fucking a woman right now, she's still gay.
Homosexuality is attraction to the same sex. Doesn't matter what you do about it, just that you have it. Adn she does.
You fuckers filled her head with guilt, and like all other "exgays" she's gonna end up in a gay bar somewhere, plastered and slutty (as previous big name "exgays" were), or she's going to off herself, or, as the only remaining alternative, she'll join the ranks of exexgays.
Even if any of those were things were true, none of them are logical reasons to ban same-sex marriage. Just because it can be changed does not mean it's wrong or should be illegal. Religion can change; does that mean we should not have freedom of religion? No, of course not. Your "reasons" are ludicrous.
I'm bisexual. I've dated women. I've slept with women. I'm now married, and faithful, to a man. Does that mean I don't still love women? No. I just found a partner I wanted to be with who happened to have a dick. That doesn't change who, or what, I am. You can't just wake up one day and deep down believe that you're over being gay/bi/straight/whatever. It doesn't happen. You are what you are. I can't change what I am any more than someone who's straight can force themselves to be, and like being, gay. And believing I can is short sighted and moronic.
I once had a friend who asked me how I know I like women. I said in response, "How do you know you like guys?" She got it from that, and never felt the need to question the attraction again. What is it about the fundie brain that, after all this time, they still don't see?
1. Even if that were true, so what?
The assertions you make, plus your comment about social suicide, suggest that you place WAY too much credence in your own, ill-informed opinions. Try learning something for a change.
okay, even IF this person was right about it being a choice (about which they are dead wrong), that would still be irrelevant. it's still discrimination.
what part of TWO CONSENTING ADULTS do these people fail to understand?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
