“The secular world laughs at intelligent design”
Naturalistic science laughs at a story about a supreme supernatural, but unidentified being, in a faceless mask, making life, yes.
“while calling macro evolution "Science" even though M.E. is based TOTALLY on pure luck and happenstance.”
The two are not mutually exclusive.
The ‘science’ is how they determined what happened.
If random chance is ‘how’ it happened, it still happened.
So, not really the complaint you think it is.
“Can you HONESTLY believe the lymph system designed itself simply by pure luck?”
No, but only creationists claim that evolution is pure luck.
“That type thinking will punch your ticket straight to hell people!”
Ah. So you think that evolution is anti-god, rather than just anti-genesis-as-literal. THAT kind of literalism is probably worse than accepting the science.
“While you listen to macro evolutionists like Richard Dawkins"
He’s a biologist. ‘macro evolutionist’ is just redundant.
“and Stephen Hawking”
A physicist.
“mock God remember this fact: Even though macro evolutionists believe hearts, veins, and pain magically”
No, sweetie, magic is your side of the street.
Maybe you mean miraculously? OH, wait, still yours.
Nope. You don’t really know what the facts are.
“ designed themselves and appeared out of nowhere,"
Not the theory.
“these same people would never believe a pop bottle cap could do the same.”
Can you cite the pop bottle theory?
