Last year, the Church of England said that boys had every right in the world to wear tiaras & tutus if they so wished.
The C-of-E is where the very basis of your precious 'Traditional Family' values/agenda - the KJV - comes from. Via a previous head of such, King James I.
Your call.
...oh, and you'd better not click on the above link, if you know what's good for you. After all: did the most 'manly' men at that time wear wifebeaters & 'MAGA' hats...?!
Don't Google '16th-17th Century Male Fashion' if you know what's good for you II. The fact it would completely annihilate your 'argument' would be the least of your problems. And not only those problems being the least of such, they would blow up in your own face: it would only serve to reinforce Pink's argument for raising children in such a way.
Ergo, what the Church of England said. And why.
You'd also learn the reason why they dropped their initial opposition to S-SM previously: thus the 2013 Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) Act becoming law.
A clue for one Zimbabwean Dollar: Hypocrisy.
One word which would spell utter doom for your very way of thinking if you dared click the above link.
Around five years later, the C-of-E's still here. Still unruined.
How's things going for the Alt-Shite/MRAs/MGTOWs/Manbabies/White Supremacists etc since the last 364 days...?!
