Putmeincoach #fundie #sexist

Putmeincoach #fundie #sexist putmeincoach.tumblr.com

Women rarely have empathy in regards to men. It’s probably why the Bible begins with a woman fucking things up for all of humanity.

47 comments

old comment by SpukiKitty

FIRST: The story's a mythical metaphor! Even the early Jews & Christians knew that! The story makes far better sense as a metaphor because....taken literally....it not only contradicts science, it makes no sense and makes God look like an idiot.

SECOND: Eve (and Adam) had the ethical understanding of an infant and could not understand concepts like Good, Evil or Disobedience.

THIRD: A talking snake talked her into it.

FOURTH: The fruit's mojo didn't really start taking effect until both Adam & Eve nommed on it.

FIFTH: Adam was with her the whole time. He could have said "No way, lady!" but no, he went "D'aaahh, okay!" like a big dope.

SIXTH: BibleGod was a big dummy for putting that tree in the garden to begin with.

SEVENTH: Assuming you're Christian, Jesus' death on the cross would've nullified the curse on Eve. Jesus respected women as equals, as did the 1-2 Century Church....hence the large amount of converts from women and the fact that he appeared to Mary Magdalene first after his Resurrection.

EIGHTH: Deborah in the Hebrew Testament would mop the floor with you and the lovely Jael would skewer your head with a tent peg. Judith would finish the job by going all "DAESH" on you with a big knife and the savvy business woman of Proverbs would pay for the knife, tent peg, clean up and linens! Esther would set the whole shebang up.

NINTH: Related to "FIRST"; The "Adam & Eve" myth means this: Early Humans started off like lower animals, not understanding concepts like "Right & Wrong", "Good & Evil", Morality or Ethics. They would not be morally culpable in any stupid thing they would do. However; Humanity later developed the ability to know these concepts BUT chose to revel in doing "Wrong/Evil/Bad", anyway. Therefore, the concept of "Karmic Debt" or "Sin" was born.

TENTH: Deity is not just Male. Deity is Female, too. "Thus Man (humanity) was made in God's Image. In the Image of God He made them. Male AND Female created He, them.". If humans of both genders & sexes are both in The Supreme's Image, that means The Elohim is "MOM & DAD" in one! Why de-value half of the Divine?

old comment by

Let me see here:

Adam, after being given direct responsibility for Eve's governance and conduct, willingly took a bite of the apple when she gave it to him.

Even in the Bible's stance on women that Adam as a man is directly responsible for Eve as the woman subject to his dominion something doesn't add up. Adam doesn't have an excuse. If anything he blew it even worse because he was standing right there and he's the one that was supposed to inform Eve better. Eve, being told all animals were under human dominion and ignorant of the concept of lies believed an animal when it spoke to her and heard no objections from Adam, who also ate. When God asked what transpired Eve told him about the snake while Adam had less to say on the matter which could be construed as trying to hide it from God. God cursed Eve and cursed snakes as well, but if Eve was at fault for being deceived why was Adam not? And if it was Lucifer or Sammael disguised as a snake why were snakes punished, and if not why would the snake be able to lie in the first place particularly as God supposedly made all animals obedient to Adam?

So Adam after blundering into the situation and engaging in his sin because he felt like it and responding like a scared child, sorry because he was told to be, came out on top and was given continued dominion over Eve despite failing in that task from day one and Eve herself being the only one actually putting any thought into her actions and asking why it was wrong.

In fact, when you think about it, GOD lied when he said that they would die on the very day they touched the fruit but the serpent told the truth in that the fruit contained knowledge. The first thing they felt was shame at their nudity perceiving it as evil without instruction from God. This further implies they were already sinning but were unaware of it, because their sin actually pleased God who did not tell them it was a sin. The real sin was knowing God to be imperfect and thinking for herself while Adam displayed willing ignorance.

So Biblical Genesis actually starts with a man letting others take the blame and seeing his own lack of self-awareness rewarded.

old comment by CrowFood

"Women lack empathy for men."

Right...which is why most of my women friends helped me this last week when my friend passed away, checked up to make sure I was taking care of myself, and got me to make an appointment with a counselor just to be on the safe side.

"Women fucking up in the Bible"

Well, let's hash the theology a moment. It should be noted that this is more the story of Milton than the Bible. The Genesis account is far more complicated: the woman eats, but her husband eats with her. They both get the whole "knowledge" bit at the same time, implying it wasn't some massive time gap.

Further, the curses levied by God would suggest both fucked up rather royally. In the allegory, it would seem, both bear an equal responsibility.

old comment by Passerby

@ the pointless one

That is possibly the dumbest claim I've ever heard on evolution, and consider where we are. If men and women just innately hated and feared one another and had no interest in contributing to each other's survival the species would go extinct. And your "tribal" aside hits a pretty obvious speed bump in that men are children until they grow up and if women couldn't empathize with them they couldn't raise them. Humans aren't ducks or insects, but I guess I shouldn't expect you to know that as I don't have the faintest idea what you happen to be.

I've also yet to hear in your own words why you're so hung up on getting a woman despite being a misanthropic fuckstick who can't stand them and constantly screaming how they're programmed to hate and destroy you from birth, as opposed to bullshit faux-intellectual soliloquy about social dynamics and bullshit-even-by-the-standards-of-pseudoscience patchworks of suppositions about biology and evolution as to why you "should" pursue a woman despite aforementioned blind seething hatred and total inability, unwillingness, and repeated statements of disgust at the very idea of supporting one let alone children you haven't the mental or emotional capacity to care for. And no, wanting to stick your dick in your alleged daughter is exactly the motherfucking opposite of that.

Do you have any idea why you do any of this?

old comment by Pharaoh Bastethotep

>Caamib:
Humans are born at an usually large size, severely impairing the mother in the final stages and rendering birth a taxing and dangerous trial. Human childhood is among the longest and most care-intensive. Raising children alone is a long-term hardship, thus, a permanent alliance is extremely beneficial.
The person most motivated to form this kind of alliance is the father, since he is increasing the fitness of his own offspring, even more so with the prospect of having a secure mating partner. To ensure lasting stability, emotional attachment and compatibility are preferable.
Thus, in humans, selection favours linking mating behaviour and emotional attachment. This phenomenon is more commonly known as (romantic) love, although you denigrate it as contemptible "seduction".

old comment by caamib

Passerloon's infantile questions have already been replied to many times. They're as silly as asking why somebody hates water if he refuses to drink what he knows is poisoned water.

I am no in sense a woman hater or even a misanthrope. I hate modern Western women because they are useless, heartless, disgusting sluts. I don't hate women who aren't like that, for example, Amish, Mormon or Orthodox Jewish women.

As for misanthropy, I for example got along with Muslims extremely well whenever I encountered them. I hate members of modern culture because they are exactly what Passerloon represents - stupid, incapable of absorbing new information, dogmatic, preachy and just basically total morons.

old comment by

And yet you want what you say is poisoned water. You say women are "evolved" not to have empathy. "Biologically" programmed to hate men. Not even human. You try to slap a religious label on that what's it going to change? You falsely claim an exception for those women because you're under the impression they would not speak, feel, or think anything without your permission. That they would not raise a hand in defense against you should you strike them, aid you in all endeavors at any personal cost, and quietly accept every betrayal until their dying day. That isn't a woman or even an animal.

Muslims I'll note were insultingly labeled by you a "sacred class" along with charges of mass murder and baby rape. And being a hateful shut-in who would happily hurt people for their own entertainment if punishment were not forthcoming is misanthropy by definition.

And that DOES NOT answer why you supposedly want a woman, it is dodging the question entirely. You really don't know do you?

old comment by Anon-e-moose

...not much traffic on your Voat 'sub' for you & your boyfriend fschit the cuck who allows his Mexican wife absolute control over his finances, eh Mary Jane Lick Sick: that you need to infect this place?

Especially after being permabanned from Reddit.

Because of your infantile thinking.

But then, if you would want to deny the basic rights of half the population, why should you be allowed the freedom of speech there? And as Freedom - certainly human rights based on democratic Rule of Law, originating from Parliament here in Britain - is a Western concept and thus is modernist, why should you be allowed the right to exist, as you would rob women of their Freedom?

But then, why should everyone - including the other half of the population, especially yours truly - have any empathy for you? You certainly have none for women, as indicated by the reason why you're reduced to being here instead of your sub on Reddit, therefore...!

old comment by caamib

"Caamib:
"."

This seems like a complete non-sequitur if we see what I wrote about before you wrote this comment but I'll reply anyway.

First of all, what you describe happens in some societies/species and not all. You know, the r/K theory. Current feminist policies and advanced technology favor the r traits, which you can see in the behavior of women (sluts, lack of premarital chastity, chasing after immoral and stupid men).

The second point is that seduction is completely the opposite of what you describe as valuable here. Men who use seduction are unlikely to take care of children and are basically like peacocks in Fisherian runaway theory. This is connected to feminism and advances in technology I mentioned. It didn't take a lot of resources and medical services for my ex fwb to have our child in a country where she didn't even know the language fully and her parents weren't around.

old comment by Pharaoh Bastethotep

"This isn't an answer to a single one of my arguments. It's a call to authority (...) and just a "You're wrong!" statement."
You have no argument; like a creationist, every statement of yours is so profoundly wrong that there is too little substance to attack, and it is pointless anyways because no amount of evidence is ever going to change your delusional mind.

"and a poor one, given that you're just a student"
Actually, I am just days away from completing my B. Sc.*, and once it has been processed, I will be a trained biologist.

"And that's pretty shameless given that you have shown you don't even know how I view things like seduction."
Ah, that old "you don't know whether I still hold my views" game. Once again, you make no indication that you changed your opinion and indeed spew forth the same nonsense as ever, I feel comfortable following the null hypothesis (you have not changed your mind). Besides, you have no problem at all ascribing positions to other people despite all insistence and evidence to the contrary yourself.
I think I have a pretty good idea of what you mean by seduction. And this is not how anyone with basic literacy in behavioural science would put it. It would be easy for me to formulate a much better (both in terms of actual, current behavioural science and in terms of looking educated and authoritative to laypeople) description of your, well, let us much more than extremely generously call it a "hypothesis".

*Before anyone asks: At my university, you can apply for M. Sc. Biology even if you have not yet finished the B. Sc. as long as you have completed most courses and you complete the B. Sc. within the semester.

“Women rarely have empathy in regards to men.”
Funny. I’ve been hospitalized q few times and about 98.34% of the women were empathatic tome, whatever condition i had. Receptionist, intake nurse, x-ray or CAT technician, ER doc, ER nurse, Cardiologist, surgeon, med student, janitor, orderly, charge nurse, the nutritionist taking meal orders, the woman in the next bed, the wife/sister/daughter of other roommates I had, the woman from Orthopedics Supply that gave me a pair of diabetic shoes, and the lady behind the counter at the gift shop.
Of course, I have MET actual women, and shown them basic respect as a matter of course, so your mileage will certainly vary.

“ It’s probably why the Bible begins with a woman fucking things up for all of humanity.”
Um…. How would empathy have changed anything at all in that story?
So, God says ‘don’t eat that you’ll die.’
Serpent says, ‘Nah, you won’t die. And doesn’t it look tasty?’
And Woman, who has absolutely NO ability to tell right from wrong, and has never been lied to before, accepts this as valid information and acts accordingly.
And shares it with Adam because it was tasty and she didn’t die, so he probablyh wanted some, too.
WHich would be empathy…

Putmeincoach #fundie #sexist putmeincoach.tumblr.com

47 comments

Confused?