image
image
17 comments
DJ Stupid, is that you?
Also, am I the only man who actually thinks that a full dress tends to be more sexy than regular clothes?
Private area?
image
Your whole body is your private area, isn't it?
I'd say this dress accentuates the "private area" much more than that frumpy blue suit does.
image
Empire dresses were much thinner than they were before, and some even wet their dresses so they would be even more see-through.
You know what's even worse? Those sinful harlots are NAKED under their CLOTHES!
Seriously, those outfits don't do anything for me. Their genitals are completely covered up. And if they did have their waists covered with even more cloth, you'd be complaining that you can see the shape of their bosoms and be demanding they be covered with even more fabric as well. You wouldn't be happy until all women are in burkas, and even then you'd probably be upset because you'd know that underneath that pile of cloth is a woman. If you can't handle your own sexuality to the point you want society to be a total sausage fest, then why don't you go live on a deserted island somewhere?
How fortunate for me that I'm not modest then.
I'll stick to wearing pants, especially when it's currently 20 degrees out with a blizzard bearing down on us.
Hiding the private area
image
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
