The NWO always makes the true victims into bad guys ....
The American South and National Socialist Germany ..
As for the American South , it is my belief that it was an economic war , the North at that time wanted the wealth of the South rather than the claim that the war was fought because of slavery ..
As for National Socialist Germany ..
Somehow it is amazing how the NWO always manages ( mostly by historical lies ) to paint the true VICTIMS of a war as the sole ones responsible ..
Has anybody else noticed this trend ?
14 comments
Such a flawless and logical portrayal of history.
"Poland attacked first"
Yes because Poland attacked a nation that was powerful enough to conquer them within a month because of "teh Rothschild Jooz!"
And the South had such economic prosperity that when the Civil War went on they had a very shitty economy compared to the North, and their population and troops started starving.
The North wanted the wealth of the South and to achieve that they laid the South in ruins!? That’s not really a sound strategy. And I am pretty sure, the South was called the bad guys before they were defeated.
As for National Socialist Germany ..
Those damn aggressive gestures, like letting Germany break the Versailles Treaty and take over Austria and Czechoslovakia without doing anything about it
@The Inquisitor:
"Poland attacked first"
Yes because Poland attacked a nation that was powerful enough to conquer them within a month because of "teh Rothschild Jooz!"
And even though they attacked first, they were completely unprepared for the German ”counterattack” “defensive action”.
Well, the stuff about Nazi Germany could be true, depending on what words like "provoced" and "agessive" mean. For instance, perhaps somebody provoces you by bending over backward to avoid warfare, and maybe using agessive in a sentence is a signal that the rest should be read as the opposite of truth, or something.
"the North at that time wanted the wealth of the South rather than the claim that the war was fought because of slavery .. "
What wealth? They had fuck all industrialisation and an increasingly dwindling international market for agricultural goods and textiles.
Yknow why Britain and France supported the North (other then for moral reasons)?
Confederate Ambassador: If you support us, we can supply you with all the cotton you could ever want!
British Government: Can get it cheaper from Egypt, what else you got?
Confederate Ambassador: er... well
Union Ambassador: Anybody want this steel? Steel goin' cheap.
British Government: Sold to the man in the top hat!
Go read the actual documents put out by the seceding states. Most of those that listed reasons for secession put slavery as one of the primary reasons.
Yes, it was a war about economics. The economical model of the South was slavery.
It's been over 76 years. Why are you still buying into propaganda that few people ever believed in the first place?
> So the "New" World Order has been around for at least 150 years?
[fundie]No, the south used to be portrayed as the good guys. The New World Order rewrote all the history books.[/fundie]
"The NWO always makes the true victims into bad guys ....
The American South and National Socialist Germany"
Well then, that tells me all I need to know about you.
The South thought they could hold the world's economy hostage by threatening to withhold the cotton supply and thus force England and France to confer legitimacy to their attempt to secede. They severely misjudged the strength of their bargaining position and lost basically all of their trade.
The South was broke as a joke which incidentally described their economic strategy perfectly. There's a reason Neo-Confederates divorce themselves from the actual government of their stupidly romanticized rebellion fiction: they admitted to fucking up royally and Davis eventually encouraged reconcilliation.
Cos everyone in Europe was just itching for a fight after the Great War.
There's a case to be made for some of our celebrated historical enemies to be given a bit more slack. Hitler, though, is not one of them. He was just shit.
"The "invading Poles" were either Germans or corpses dressed in Polish uniforms. The Gleiwitz Incident was a notable and successful false flag operation. Wikipedia has a perfectly adequate explanation."
Everything is a false flag, a fake, a fallacy, or a figment of the imagination with you guys, is nothing real?!
Everything is a false flag, [
] with you guys, is nothing real?!
Someone writing this on CTSTDT with a straight face is hilarious.
I have to admit, Bill, your entertainment value is increasing.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
