"Uh, I'm sorry, but Rome fell for a fuck ton of reasons. None of them include "women having sexual freedom". Overexpansion, the widened gap between the rich and the poor, Constantine's changing of religions to Christianity (which essentially made the emperor's word useless), the division of the Empire into two halves, insane government corruption, mass migration of the Huns and Barbarians, and a sad weakening of the legions.

In fact, with all the power that women DIDN'T have, you could technically say that Rome fell because of men."

None of them include "women having sexual freedom".

All of them do and even the ones you mention that aren't batshit have a lot to do with women having sexual freedom.

Overexpansion

Bullcrap. The state didn't even extend itself after around 100 AD at all. In fact, last great extensions were all done before 0 AD. If that's a reason it sure took awhile.

the widened gap between the rich and the poor

Ahahah you idiot. And the gap wasn't wide during the Republic? Just more bullcrap.

Constantine's changing of religions to Christianity (which essentially made the emperor's word useless)

What does this even mean? Made the "emperor's word useless"? Just a bunch of retarded empty talk.

How did Christianity bring about the downfall?

the division of the Empire into two halves

YOU MORON. That's your reason for collapse ??!! This was a necessary measure to ease administration.

insane government corruption

True, but that is always a consequence of increased feminism in society.

mass migration of the Huns and Barbarians

...Who would be no match for the Roman army if it weren't for feminism.

and a sad weakening of the legions

...due to feminist policies. You can see the same thing in Western countries today. They're pathetically weak just like dying Western Roman Empire was.

with all the power that women DIDN'T have, you could technically say that Rome fell because of men.

You have a bizzare notion of what feminism is. Feminism is always brought upon by men. It was men who gave women suffrage in the West, it was men who brought feminism to Roman Empire. And since feminism always destroys a society and it gets replaced with a strong patriarchal society of course only men can bring about feminism. If something like suffragettes showed up in a sane patriarchal world they'd be laughed at by other women and killed if they created any problems. But suffragettes don't appear in such societies because feminism appears only when men enable it. Why didn't men kill the suffragettes in the 19th century? Because West was already getting weak. Read https://caamib.wordpress.com/the-story-of-your-incel-an-inconvenient-truth/