blzd1 and creationofadam #racist

blzd1 and creationofadam #racist stormfront.org

Quote:
Originally Posted by blzd1:
Statistically, women are the ones who usually initiate a divorce. With no fault divorce, the husband didn't even have to do anything bad like cheat or be abusive. She may just want half of his stuff. Not because she necessarily earned it, but because of her sense of entitlement.

I do blame white women for this, or at least the policies which they have accepted. (Although we do know who is really behind this) In my opinion, their natural role is to be wives and mothers. This is a complementary role. Instead, they have taken to the work force, and their new master is their employer. Now women compete with men. The basic social structure is the family, and it is being destroyed.

White woman are not the ones at fault here and definately not the ones to be blaming. You stated yourself that it's the marxist feminist movement that plays a key role in this and those responsible are the ones proliferating this agenda on us, the jews. The destruction of the white family has the zionist fingerprints of the jew all over it. Also the statistics you are refering to are likely taken as a whole of the population of American within recent years and do not list race and it is very likely that a good percentage of the divoces where by non-whites or race traitors. Blaming white women for a marxist epidemic that is engineered by the jew to destroy our culture is doing exactly what the jew has had planned all along.

15 comments

old comment by SpukiKitty

What really is hilarious about Anti-Judaics is that they blame the Jewish people for all things Progressive & Feminist despite the fact that it was THE JEWS who wrote the oft-Regressive, misogynist Old Testament.

BIGOTS: Embrace Bronze Age Hebrew mores...reject said Hebrews & Hebrew derivatives.

This discrepancy is probably why that "Christian Identity" crapola took off...to rid oneself of the cognitive dissonance...despite having NO SCRIPTURAL BASIS WHATSOEVER!

As much as I loathe with a passion the Wotan's Kreiger crowd, at least their choice of spirituality makes a bit more sense. If you're a raving Anti-Judaic, Abrahamic religions are not the way to go. Abrahamic faiths are SEMITIC CENTRAL!

Also, I prefer to use the term "Anti-Judaic" over "Anti-Semite" for the simple fact that Arabs & Palestinians are Semitic, too. If you're a direct or semi-direct descendent of old Abe, you're Semite-material.

Also, many Jews aren't ethnically Semitic, anyway. There's actually CHINESE Jews!

But we're all related anyway...we're Africans!

old comment by Hasan Prishtina

Being anti-Judaic is closely related to anti-Semitism, but it is not the same thing. Christians were, by and large, anti-Judaic until the nineteenth century. Jews were seen as Christ killers and Judaism as a hidebound, religion of a vengeful god, based on a self-serving interpretation in Christian tradition and without any understanding of how Judaism has developed in the last two thousand years; much of this persists to this day, albeit in highly muted form. But any Jew could avoid the wrath of the anti-Judaic simply by converting to Christianity. Anti-Semitism is rather different. Here, the focus of hatred is on the Jew as being ethnically different. There is nothing a Jew can do to stop being Jewish; he may disavow his relations, change his religion, his name, his sex, his language - none of its avoids the object of hatred. If you want to call it something other than anti-Semitism, call it what it is: Jew-hatred.

old comment by Hasan Prishtina

(continued)

The word anti-Semitism was invented by an anti-Semite politician and writer and was aimed exclusively at Jews objects of hatred and contempt. It still means that, as can be seen in any respectable dictionary. There has been a movement in recent years to devalue the word "anti-Semitism" on the grounds that there are other semitic peoples. There are a number of problems with this. Firstly, it falls into the trap of accepting race and ethnicity as a natural given rather than the social constructs that they are, hence arguments about "why Jews are not a race." Secondly, "semitic" describes a group of languages, now usually known in North America as Afro-Asiatic languages. Those who wish to broaden the term "anti-Semitic" to mean "against semites" now run into an absurd situation, that of being against people who speak a particular group of languages which includes not only Hebrew and Arabic but a number of other languages spoken in East and North Africa as well as Europe. The possibility that anyone, let alone a semi-literate poster on Stormfront, might hate speakers of Soqotri and Maltese for what they have in common is mighty peculiar, particularly when it also entails hating Ethiopian speakers of Chaha and Tigrinya but not Ethiopian speakers of Nuer or Mursi. It would also exclude the very large proportion of Jews who do not speak a Semitic language.

This "redefinition" of anti-Semitism may look reasonable at first glance, but when one looks beyond the etymology of each part of the word to look at the whole, the effect is to blunt the impact of both the word and the charge of anti-Semitism. This "redefinition" has often been promoted and reproduced by those who are uncomfortable with the what the word "anti-Semitism" actually means. Those who are the object of the attentions of these arguments find it hard to tell where "anti-Semitism does not exist" ends and Jew-hatred begins.

old comment by Mech610

I was going to respond to SpukiKitty about how many of the same people who hate on Jews also hate on Arabs and therefore the term 'anti-Semite' is still valid and it doesn't make much sense to come up with a completely different phrase for essentially the same thing, then I noticed that Hasan has pretty much taken care of things here. Much more eloquently than I would have put it in any case.

However, I would point out the presence of the Cohen Gene in most, if not all Jewish populations, yes, including that enclave of Chinese Jews you're referring to, the religion and the gene were probably spread that far via the Silk Road. The presence of that gene suggests that there IS a legitimate Jewish ethnicity and that the culture is not unified simply by sharing the same faith. No matter how much certain people on this site ((Who will remain nameless)) want to believe otherwise.

Finally SpukiKitty, beyond arguing semantics, roughly 80% or so of Jewish men alive today have their ethnic roots in the Phoenicians and North African nomadic tribes, a pair of common ancestries they share with many Arabs. Therefore, I find it unreasonable to come up with an entirely separate phrase for a minority section of the population, when 'anti-Semite' remains accurate and is widely accepted as the term for anti-Jewish and anti-Arab bigots.