Oboehner:
"It occurs throughout nature." So does incest, murder, rape, torture, pedophilia, cannibalism, etc. that all normal too?

Parodyx:
Why are you comparing all these practices of abuse to a wholly consensual non-abusive act?

Oboehner:
Remember this statement attempting to justify perversion? "It occurs throughout nature."
I was pointing out all of the other things that occur in nature, and if sodomy is normal because you claim it occurs in nature, so is everything else that occurs in nature. Can't have it both ways.

Parodyx:
You also don't get to have it both ways. You have to call straight couples who practice it all the same vile names you call homosexuals. And in fact since you like to call even the homosexuals who don't practice sodomy "sodomites" maybe you should start calling the people in your church sodomites too. Fair's fair after all, and you don't seem too bothered by facts.

Oboehner:
"You have to call straight couples who practice it all the same vile names you call homosexuals" If it smell like crap...

Parodyx:
Why, do you have a problem applying rules failrly across the board?
You call homosexuals sodomites. Despite the fact that many of them, including gay men, don't engage in the practice.
Why, then, do you not want to call heterosexuals the same thing since all the exact same rules apply?
Wait...I think I know. Because this is not about labelling people according to their actions. This is about a group of people you hate and want to call an offensive name.

Oboehner:
Like I said before, the vast majority of gay men do, and the rest - give them time.
If heteros engage in it, it is still sodomy by definition.
What is pathetic is the fact that when gaymen engage in it - that's ok. Calling their actions by the proper name is somehow vile when doing it isn't?