abidingone #fundie

abidingone #fundie bibleforums.org

The theory of evolution requires billions of years of constant violations of the 2nd Law. Evolution from chaos to organization is like an explosion in a print shop which somehow produces a dictionary or a blender transforming itself into the Starship Enterprise.

25 comments

old comment by NonHomogenized

He can't reread the 2nd law; he's assuredly never read it in the first place.
Also, why wasn't more of this post quoted? I mean, seriously, " Many noted scientists who have rejected the theory of evolution of purely scientific grounds. They include, but are not limited to Michael Faraday, Lord Kelvin, Joseph Lister, Louis Pasteur, Johann Kepler, and Sir William Ramsey etc."? Great. Kepler died in 1630, over 200 years before OOS was even published. According to the writing of Kelvin, he believed in evolution with divine guidance. Pasteur accepted evolution, according to his writings. I couldn't find anything Faraday said on the subject, either for or against evolution. Nor could I find (in a brief search) anything Lister said about evolution. Quite a bit of misinformation can be found in that post.

old comment by Big Chicken Dinner

The 2nd law of thermosdynomics clearly states that things do not simply move from a state of disorder to a more eloquant orderly state UNLESS there is evidence of a designer. Just like if a room was messy and you came back and found everything in a nice, neat condition, you would logically assume that a designer had put everything in order again.

It is like this that we see the true hand of the Lord. We know that it is a natural LAW, not a mere speculative theory (/clears throat and rolls eyes at evolution), that all order must have a designer.

The universe come from someplace, right? Therefore, there is a designer. Sorry Darwinist, we creationist have science on our side. There ain't enough "closed systems" to get around the LAW of thermosdynamics.

Try reading a book or something (preferably the Bible, which is the real choice of top scientists).

old comment by The Duelist

"It is like this that we see the true hand of the Lord. We know that it is a natural LAW, not a mere speculative theory (/clears throat and rolls eyes at evolution), that all order must have a designer."

Assuming that your faulty logic was actually valid, how do you know that this Designer was the "Lord"? Why not Odin, or Azathoth?

"The universe come from someplace, right? Therefore, there is a designer. Sorry Darwinist, we creationist have science on our side. There ain't enough "closed systems" to get around the LAW of thermosdynamics."

The universe is not a closed system, like a messy room. And while there could be a Supreme Being who created the universe, it's beyond stupid for you and your fellow Creao-tards to jump and say, "it's da GAWD of the Wholly Babble! PUH-RAZE DA LORD!!"
Reading ancient myths from a book of fairy tales is not "science". It's bullshit. And your entire comment FAILS even more drastically due to the fact that you mixed up the Theory of Evolution with the Big Bang Theory. Evolution is a biological theory explaining how organisms adapt to a particular environment; BB is a theory hailing from Physics, a totally separate and distinct wing of science. This is what I love about idiots like you; you try to debunk evolution even though you can't even tell the difference between Biology and Physics. How stupid can you get?

"Try reading a book or something (preferably the Bible, which is the real choice of top scientists)."

The bible says the earth is flat, humans can inbreed without ill effects, and most scientists are either atheists or agnostics.

A FAIL SO EPIC IT JUST MIGHT BE A WIN.

old comment by Anon

Are people like this misunderstanding the second law of thermodynamics, or are they denying the midday sun?

@David F Mayer:

From a statistical mechanics perspective, entropy is defined as the logarithm of the number of accessible energy states in a system. Using Boltzmann's incredible tour-de-force of statistics, you can show that that's equivalent to the thermodynamic definition. Entropy can reverse itself, but the probability is vanishingly small for any system with an interesting number of particles.

Fortunately for us all, the sunlight hitting the Earth mostly gets re-radiated as infrared, which has the same energy and about twenty times the entropy. So life can exist quite nicely without getting anywhere near the entropic limit.

“The theory of evolution requires billions of years of constant violations of the 2nd Law.”
Look up the scientific definitions of ‘ape’ and the ’2nd Law Of Thermodynamics.’
Humans fit APE a lot better than Earth fits the 2nd Law.

abidingone #fundie bibleforums.org

25 comments

Confused?