Christianity’s rotten democratic heart promotes weakness as virtue and nourishes instincts most normal people feel ashamed of. Everyone likes to be told they count for something, yet even during vigorous exchanges in the 19th century – yes even then - our state religion campaigned ferociously against protecting the race it publicly championed and long before political correctness made it mandatory to do so.

It stymied the eugenics movement. It bullied science into listing Sub-Saharan blacks as modern humans instead of categorizing them as a separate species. You might think we can defuse this ideological time-bomb but should we really take the risk?

By contrast Jews feel no compulsion to save the world but, like Muslims, fight to control it. The Jewish God is a national God. Jews seek no converts and leave the spiritual welfare of others to others. What’s wrong with that? In a closed society you could probably deify Axminster carpets or Haagen Dazs ice cream to much the same effect. As long as your concerned with ‘humanity’ you’ve no chance and, with christianity, no choice.

Nothing I can think of goes to the heart of our dilemma in the modern world more than universalism – a founding and ineradicable tenet of christianity and a flaw waiting to be exploited. Resurrections are all very well, but resurrecting a collective fetish for self-sacrifice in the interests of genetic aliens is intrinsic to this religion and will always follow at some point if we restore christianity to national life. I think we’ll have to beg to differ on this one.

African blacks are the nearest of the three major races to gorillas and chimpanzees and Nigerians - Ibo [Igbo] and Hausa - the nearest among Africans blacks, who alone carry their alleles. A white woman who creates a mulatto child with a Bantu African [Bantus having been more isolated than other groups] will almost certainly be more closely related genetically to a white child selected at random than her own offspring.