[Such a ludicrous idea... "Creation science". Science isn't democratic and shouldn't be voted upon.]
Go read a book, how can you criticize any side without knowing first both sides?
I have read and studied many books on either side, and when you put the too on the scale evolution fails to uphold itself.
(later on in the thread)
["How come 1,000s follow a ludicrious idea? How about, how can millions believe the Earth is flat. Numbers don't mean a thing if you're wrong. Strike two."]
Yes people do believe in strange things. rock to human seems stranger than one believing in a flat earth.
29 comments
My friend I do not believe that you know how evolution really works, which makes the rest of your post somewhat hyppocritical to say the least. Watching Hovind videos does not add up to studying evolution.
I also suspect you to be guilty of quite a bit of lying for Jesus.
"Go read a book, how can you criticize any side without knowing first both sides?"
Good point. Get back to us after you learn some science.
"Yes people do believe in strange things. rock to human seems stranger than one believing in a flat earth. "
Yes dirt to human makes so much more sense.
Rock to human? Ridiculous!
Dust to human? Totally rational and absolutely true!
"Yes people do believe in strange things."
Um, dude? How could you possible expect to be taken seriously when you don't know the difference between too and two? That's basic grammar; something we all learn in elementary school.
You obviously have an alternate definition of the word "read". Probably a home school graduate.
This dipshit's shown up trolling over at RD.net too. He's sock puppet happy after each ban but he seems to have calmed down now. Here's his URL if anybody here wants to pop by the forums on his ill-informed site and say HI!
http://www.johnmuise.com
Just hit the "Debates" link when you get there and it'll take you right to the forums.
I think we've reached a point where it is no longer an argument between atheists and fundies, it is a battle between 4th Century science and 21st Century science.
We have the theories, we win!
http://www.johnmuise.com
Words cannot being to explain the epic failure that this site is. Micro evolution? Macro evolution? Quoting 2 scientists and not giving citations? Humans are an accident?
Seriously, another pseudo-intellectual fundie (more than likely Baptist) using the same tired old arguments and tactics that have been refuted many times.
Oh my God (<- notice the irony), did you see that site?
They copied their manifesto word-for-word from a YouTube video and then were stupid enough to actually POST THIS VIDEO DIRECTLY BELOW it.
Their "debate" team seems to consist of fifteen year-olds. Except for the "Youth Leader" of course.
And they're educated on "all areas of science". Now there's a statement I couldn't make and I consider myself pretty well educated. In fact even the top scientists and renaissance men and women of our time couldn't truthfully say that. Well, except for a bunch of brilliant high-school kids apparently.
The best part about this guy? Every one of his claims is countered in EvoWiki.
http://wiki.cotch.net/index.php/List_of_Creationist_arguments
You'd think if a group of people want to claim they know all about science and can refute evolution, they'd come up with new ways with try and debate. This is just a group of "freethinking" teenagers who believe they are intelligent because their pastor told them so.
Funny, you tell someone else to read a book, claim to have read and studied many books on both sides, and yet come out with a totally ignorant statement like "rock to human" to describe evolution? Liar, liar, pants on fire!PS Perhaps by strange things you meant "dirt to human" instead of "rock to human", oops that's your creation science that says that nonsense.
...why am I reminded of the 'Aren't you glad to know you're not a golem?' scene from "Stranger than Fiction"?
YAY! We're rock people!
*looks at her big, strong hands*
Oh dear, I see this individual is starting to make a name for himself. For all the wrong reasons.
If you want to see some of the canards he vomited forth at the Richard Dawkins Forums with respect to evolution (and in the process demonstrated that his understanding of the subject was inferior to that of my tropical fish) he posted there under the nickname of CRTAdmin. He's now set up a foetid little creationist website that I suspect some here might like to have fun using as a source for more FSTDT quotes. Another self-absorbed circle-jerk Hovind wannabee who thinks he's going to become an A-list celebrity by spouting creotard nonsense loudly enough. Question being, will he have enough sense to pay his taxes if he does make a career out of being a professional liar for jeebus?
“Go read a book, how can you criticize any side without knowing first both sides?”
Science is defined as completely naturalistic. Creation science DEPENDS ON a supernatural actor. Therefore it’s not science.
“I have read and studied many books on either side, and when you put the too on the scale evolution fails to uphold itself.”
And creationism disqualifies itself by definition. They can’t both be on the scale.
“ Yes people do believe in strange things. rock to human seems stranger than one believing in a flat earth.”
Okay, do you have any actual criticism of the methodology that reaches this conclusion? Or just reject it as ‘silly.’?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.