latest

The Voice of Reason #sexist thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com

A libertarian state should give sluts the rope to hang themselves.

A libertarian state would not presume to stop sluts from disposing of their unwanted babies either before or after birth.

Sluts are the agents of illegitimacy and therefore the agents of degeneracy and corruption.

If promiscuous women are seen to be ones frequently killing their babies because they are too stupid, careless and lazy to practise effective contraception, then in time they will come to be ostracised by society.

Currently, Western men are terrified of offending sluts.

Remember, sluts are fornicatresses who are the agents of illegitimacy and therefore the agents of degeneracy and corruption, who will destroy your civilisation with their promiscuity and inability to practise effective contraception. Sluts are stupid too. If you are a bastard, then half your genes are full of stupid slut genes, and the other half full of the genes of an MCSF (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fucker). What would happen to your country if most of your countrymen and countrywomen are like that?

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2011/may/31/care-failing-those-with-learning-disability
"people with a learning disability, whose numbers are growing by up to 5% a year and who can require care and support costing a typical £1,500 a week" Most of the mothers of the learning disabled will be SSMs [Slut Single Mothers].

And still no British male politician will criticise the irrational and irresponsible reproductive choices of stupid sluts.

The Voice of Reason #sexist thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com

Peter Hitchens:

"There's only one lasting, simple welfare reform package this country needs. It goes like this. First, an announcement that nine months from today, all benefits of any kind for new unmarried mothers should cease.

Note the word 'new'. Existing victims of one of the stupidest policies in human history should continue to get their handouts and subsidised homes until their children are grown. It is not their fault, or their children's, that they were misled by weak and wicked politicians into this way of life.

They should not be condemned or harassed."

Why not? Is Peter Hitchens afraid of SSMs [Slut Single Mothers]? Is he afraid his wife and her friends will disapprove of his proposing taking any stronger action against these irresponsible and promiscuous women who are the equivalent of cancer cells in any society? What does his wife think should be done about SSMs? Nothing?

Clearly, if she disapproves of his views on SSMs she might give him a hard time, or even divorce him for holding views she dislikes. Perhaps that is why he is afraid of proposing doing anything more than just leaving these bastard-bearing sluts alone.

As we can see from reading http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20130526/focus/focus3.html tolerating illegitimacy is tantamount to inviting a cancer to grow in your body and inviting members of your society to become an inferior race.

SSMs can still work in brothels after the Equality Act 2010 is repealed. It is one of the twin pillars of feminism. Once no-fault divorce is also done away with, then both legs of feminism will be cut away from her, and this foul pernicious ideology finally die a well-deserved death.