[Replying to the remark that we as a human species are not weak, but robust as shown by our scientific advances]

Scientific advances? Like polluting the environment and inventing cancer!?

Most politicians and religious leaders are members of secret societies. Masonry and the Vatican control the power of the world. These societies and the Vatican practice satanism. They have created international terrorism with the purpose of creating the third World War. They want to make it appear that all conflicts have been caused by conflicts and divisions between world countries and religions to establish a one world government and religion ruled by a leader who will claim to be the prophesied Messiah and to rule by divine authority. They will quote Bible verses to deceive people into thinking this is the Kingdom of God, and they will make all kind of signs and wonders. The UFO phenomenon and New Age Movement have been created for this purpose. This is the kingdom of the beast prophesied in the Bible in which all nations will gather. All people will worship the beast and all true followers of Yeshua will be persecuted. The aliens are fallen angels and hybrids, the gods worshipped by the ancient civilizations. Of course they will present great benefits to the population and they will relase new technologies and promises of peace and prosperity but do not believe them, they are only lying. This will be a fascist government, where all the people will be implanted with mind control chips and the useless eaters put to death. They have planted many lies to keep us away from the truth. God is not of any religion or denomination, because all are controlled and have substituted God because they claim to be the Truth, the Way and the Life. God is in our heart and teaches us individually, we must only understand and do what He commands. The Only Way is Yahshua the Messiah. What the majority believes is always the lie. Where the carcass is (false Christ), the vultures will gather (multitudes). <<<a href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/" target="_blank">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/</a>>> <<<a href="http://www.sherryshriner.com/" target="_blank">http://www.sherryshriner.com/</a>>> <<<a href="http://www.mt.net/~watcher/" target="_blank">http://www.mt.net/~watcher/</a>>>

I was an atheist most of my life, since the age of about 12. After ditching the tooth fairy, easter bunny and santa claus, God was next in line. This was my liberation. I was of the opinion that there was no God, and that all rational people should draw the same conclusion. The only thing that could possibly budge me from my position was EVIDENCE.

Well, in September 2004, I got the evidence. Absolute proof in fact. I got it shortly after I wrote message 666 on the 3rd anniversary of 9/11. Message 666 was the culmination of my 37 years of searching for the words to describe my ideology/religion (as an atheist I was STRONGLY supporting freedom and human rights). You can read about message 666 here (I've posted it before):

<a href="http://antisubjugator.blogspot.com/2005/07/sign-of-beast.html" target="_blank">http://antisubjugator.blogspot.com/2005/07/sign-of-beast.html</a>

However, as you have probably guessed already, the proof that I was given was not independently scientifically verifiable. Which means you have no option other than to dismiss it. Or at most, you can only accept it as a theory. So anyway, here is the "theory":

We are living in a computer simulation, and God is the computer programmer. This model does not require supernatural powers. All it requires is for us to have computer technology more advanced than we have at the moment - Artificial Intelligence for starters. In a 15 billion year history, don't you think it is quite improbable that we happened to be born just when computers, nukes and the internet were invented? And also just when the USSR collapsed opening the way for worldwide freedom. And on a millenium year as well. A mere 1 million years either way would have drastically altered the simulation. Hell, even 1000 years either way would have drastically changed things.

I believe the universe is only a few decades old. God didn't sit around twiddling his thumbs for 15 billion years waiting for us to evolve. The whole thing is simulated. The whole universe is just a "virtual reality". We're probably really on a space ship, and this simulation is being run for entertainment purposes (can you think of anything better than a virtual reality to keep yourself entertained?).

And the reason God doesn't want to prove his existence is so that people will become atheists and be totally free. This is what he wants. He doesn't want to tell people how to live their lives, he wants us to make up our own rules. The only way we can be totally free is if we believe there is no God, or at least, that there's no God who's going to sit in judgement. In actual fact, we are all NATURAL ANIMALS. None of us are sinners. We all act in accordance with our genes, reacting to our environment, and using our imperfect logic skills. None of these things are our fault.

Anyway, my point is that there is definitely an intelligent entity in another dimension to us. So if you're a hard-core atheist, think again, because you're actually wrong (even though I can't scientifically prove that to your satisfaction). You need to update your model and allow for the possibility of a God, and convert to agnosticism instead. BTW, a computer simulation gives a logical reason why we can't reproduce life from raw ingredients - the properties are defined in software, which we don't have access to.

[Replying to 'Early embryos have no brain...they are basically a parasite']The Lord Almighty, referring to LadyShea's soul when it floats up out of this world's septic tank for His inspection:  Methinks the lady has no charity... she has basically been a parasite breathing the air plants produced and eating food Mexican day-laborers harvested except when she held her breath during the Bork supreme court nomination process.

You Athiests really can't handle the truth can ya. Move my thread, close my thread, and worse CAN'T ANSWER MY THREAD... how just and fair of you ATHIESTS or if I'm not spelling it write, I'll call you what the Bible rightly calls you FOOLS.

Yeah, like when the mother is a broken-down syphilitic, having already bred 8 other children who is living in poverty and gets herself impregnated by her boss who remains married to another woman. Certainly, in such a case the 'real ill effects of a birth CAN be seen with a fair degree of certainty.'

I see no reason why anyone should become angry about these things. I am not here to become angry at atheists, nor am I here to make atheists angry at me. But when I get an opportunity to press someone's buttons, I will do so.

If the government was allowed to print objective, truthful statements about homosexuality, the populace would be against it. The American people are sick of the gay agenda anyway, but the powers that be has honest Americans too busy with work to pay taxes to object to the agenda. If you are too busyn slaving, you cannot complain.

I beg to differ [that Africa is a harsh land], Africa's physical conditions are this: a climate that allows one to be nude all year round, plentiful food and other resources.

And I personally think society is better without atheism. Good thing heaven won't have any atheists in it.

[Just a few minutes later, after many dissenting scholars are quoted]I have studied a lot over the years on the 'scholarly' interpretations of the ancient scripts. They are so messed up they can't tell heads or tails of much of anything. One scholar will contridict another etc.

[Replying to 'You have considered that many Jews in the media doesn't necessarily imply a global conspiracy?']Yes, and I rejected it after looking over a mountain of evidence in various fields.

Could you people at least make a tiny effort to understand the one religion you bash endlessly? How do you expect to ever persuade anyone out of ignorance?

No more than the massive conflict of interest inherent in others here parroting off rebuttals against "anti-semitism" that they hear from jews.

[On a website that debunks his claims about the Holocaust]That looks like a biased source to me.

I am not interested in seeing your anti-Europoid bigotry.

I exercise my second amendment right to prepare effectively to defend myself, should I ever need to... I am being a gentleman now and warning you (plural) of this danger to yourselves, and I am very curious about how many of you will heed it.

I've studied several Bible commentaries where all faiths and 'most' Biblical scholars agree on this.

[After it's shown late-term abortions are used only out of extreme medical necessity]Your post sounds like an emotional rant to me. Please write more rationally and I would be happy to address what you are concerned about.

Have you ever wondered why you are so angry? I could tell you ...

A young women that finds herself pregnant has acted foolishly and immorally because she willingly acted to put herself and her unborn child in harms way, whatever her intent.

Should I be hated for being against ritual murder, caring about the safety of children and non-human mammals, for being against slavery... against ripping people off... against child pornography... against religious superstition and the tremendous economic, social, political, and emotional harm that it has caused, AND for being suspicious of those innocent of such actions but who have shown that they will support others of their tribe, expecially their leaders, no matter what?

... the Democratic party protects it by stone-walling the outlawing of it in an effort to cater to radical feminists they are liars and in no way are they advocates for the protection of children.

Well, in California, if a woman doesn't put her seat belt on her body, cops have the right to give her a $60 ticket. Isn't that a 'way whatsoever' that someone else has a right over a woman's body?

Hello Atheists, I am inclined to tolerate you people and must say that atheism is not inherently offensive to me.

My point is that cold-climate peoples are more advanced mentally, on average, than warm-climate peoples. As for 'whites,' it seems that we (as I am one) are more advanced in some mental areas...

You don't have to believe He exists to hate Him. You hate Him by default, just by rejecting His existence.

Why is it that jews tend to claim to be very moral people, and yet try to excuse the other jews' atrocities? Do you think the 'son of sam' killer should be released from his New York cell because he is jewish?

Why punish babies because women choose to have sex stupidly and immorally?.. Your love of being consistently selfish is what animates your hatred of the once upon a time universal law against abortion. Babies must be chopped into pieces and sucked out of wombs so that those wombs can continue to behave irresponsibly. What an inspiring cause you champion.

I admit that 'white' people do horrible, stupid things (burn innocent women and children alive, etc.) when under the influence of jewish dogma.

I would only kill athiests.

The jews are an enemy because of their racial character, not because of their religion, which is merely one of many byproducts of said racial character. Many of those 'atheistic communists' were in fact racial jews.

It also sickens me to see my fellow German-Americans here in Wisconsin shed tears over the alleged holoco$t/holohoax when many of these people were vicious anti-German bigots.

LOL! Would you like me to start naming media CEOs?

Go to some dog breeding place and tell them to mix their purebreds with other breeds to produce something better and thus make more money, and tell me how long they roll on the ground in laughter.

My whole thesis is that it is okay to hate the individuals who... engage in usery... sexually enslave children... practice ritual murder... agitate the lower classes against the nobility... shamelessly distort history... label all of humanity outside of their tribe as sub-human... cause superstition, religious dogma... and to be wary of the people connected to these people. In other words, it is reasonable to hate jews who do these things and to not trust jews who have not done any of these things...

You are welcome to come here and review my grades in my science courses from high school to the present.

There are a great number of instances where jews show a fascination with various perversions. Look at the jew howard stern.

Yes, and unfortunately they do not remember the 1967 unprovoked israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty (talmudic hatred and backstabbing at its finest).

It won't do any good to quibble about how 'successful' naturalisitc science has been. This can only be attributed to pure chance.

If you can accuse me of wanting to force women to carry their babies to term, then I can accuse you women who have abortions of having forced their men to have had sex with them. That’s no less logical. Just more absurd.

If I was President of the USA... Social Security would be outlawed. The public school system would be thing of history. If you have 8 children, you pay for 8 children to go to school... Nasa would die. If you want to put a salllelite into space, your company will pay for it. The post office will die... cocaine, heroin and ecstacy would be decriminalized... The orpahnages will be for profit, which will maximaze placement to good quality families... The death penalty will be given to those who commit the following crimes... Rape... Armed robbery... Homosexuality with anyone under 16.

what if you're blind? The Universe hasn't been proven to exist to a blind man, has it?

If i become a doctor it will be to heal humans. If i wanted to heal primates i would have been a veterinarian.

No you may not be heartless and cruel but you are heartless and callous in your belief that developing homo sapiens 'have no brain.'

From what I have read of that book, it sounds like it is very biased against whites. Even the titles tries to imply that Europeans 'stole' world hegemony through their diseases.

Well, in the adult world, the guy who goes against the dogmas of his time is a laughingstock. I am honored to have something in common with Galileo and Darwin.

[Replying to 'Coma patients have brain activity']So do the brain dead. But, unlike you, I don’t ask you to take my word for it.

If they [his views] are so unsupported, why have I received all of these angry replies? Why be angry at someone for being wrong? Think about this for a moment. If I am wrong, I deserve pity and not hatred/disdain... The fact that I receive the latter is very telling indeed.

I think that jewish conspiracies are dynamic, not static from 3000 years ago onward (that would be preposterous). Instead, their ideas develop as they see new opportunities. I think the slave trade was more about profit, and mixing white people into oblivion (at least the modern version) probably was developed in the last 200 years or so.