I may not always like what the Bible says (take that whole love your neighbor thing - what was God thinking?), but I find it presents a clear and consistent picture of who God is and who we are and what the relationship is between him and us.
Persons who cannot love the other sex are, do some degree, very narcissistic. What they love is only their own picture in the other person. And that it what excludes love and care for those of the other side.
The demonic personality of Obama is displayed very clearly. Other reviewers did an excellent job in itemizing out the topics covered in this book. However, I recommend Obamafile.com on the internet to update this information. Obama is a dangerous man. Even more dangerous is a fully democratic government which would unleash leftist policies on the American Republic overnight. Hard working middle class white Americans would be oppressed by the juwish puppet Barack Obama. Obama wants to teach sex ed to children, endorses abortion and is for every despictable thing you can imagine. At a juwish group, he demonstrated his hatred of white Americans of whom he said clung to their guns and Bibles. You bet we do Obama with the likes of you trying to enter public office to take away the right to cling to those guns and Bibles. Obama is a threat to our freedoms in a way worse than Clinton. This is an excellent book. However, many other important facts aren't really addressed: such as, is he even an American citizen? How did this poor kid get into Harvard law school and then run for state senator? Is he a queer as two mysteriously murdered people at his church said?
I love coming to the Religious Forum to read what you so-called Atheists have to say. I don't believe most of you for a moment, though. You come here and bloviate about a God you "claim" you don't believe in and get yourselves all worked up over it. You seem to be on a mission. It's hilarious. You're like little mini-devils. The Devil believes in God, he just hates him. I think you too believe in God. Why else would you expend so much time and energy writing about how much you hate him? And you do hate him so. So you must therefore believe in him. You are, however, very entertaining.
[....] But not any God, mind you - mostly the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob - Jesus, the Son of God. Notice, T.R., how often they refuse to capitalize the 'g' in God, for example - they must know, with all their "supposed wisdom", that wisdom that makes them feel they know more and better than God, that to spell it with a small 'g' is an insult to Christians. So, yes, they hate Christians - but they REALLY, REALLY hate God with a grand passion.
I love coming to the Religious Forum to read what you so-called Atheists have to say. I don't believe most of you for a moment, though. You come here and bloviate about a God you "claim" you don't believe in and get yourselves all worked up over it. You seem to be on a mission. It's hilarious. You're like little mini-devils. The Devil believes in God, he just hates him. I think you too believe in God. Why else would you expend so much time and energy writing about how much you hate him? And you do hate him so. So you must therefore believe in him. You are, however, very entertaining.
(Discussing the contradictory accounts among the Gospels about the number of angels present at Jesus' tomb)
As for counting one angel or two angels as a contradiction. Angels are spirits and can appear and disappear instantly.
There is more evidence documented, of the existence of Jesus Christ then there is of Julius Caesar.
I am amazed at how defensive the darwinists are. Someone finally calls them on the carpet and they have "gang-piled" over a thousand reviews against this film. Why? Because they don't believe in Free Speech. They are the new Puritians who silence those with whom they disagree. This film [Expelled] documents that.
[This review goes on like this for a really long time...]
I knew "Expelled" would be a rollicking time after I discovered the film sent battery acid coursing through the veins of Richard Dawkins, the oft-celebrated Josef Mengele of Oxford. The man tiptoed across the Atlantic in a failed sabotage against a preview screening in St. Paul for crying out loud. That should show to the unobservant average Joe that something in the Intelligent Design movement is making the Ape-worshippers squeal and squirm even more than Bible-toting creationists of yester-year. "Expelled," starring economist and Yale-educated lawyer Ben Stein, shoves the not-shy evil eye of the movie camera into the faces of sputtering atheists and Darwiniacs alike, and the result is like watching one of those funny home videos when a precocious-looking child, bat in hand, gives dad a surprise blow in his privates.
The question is why are these people under attack if the scientific community is truly interested in open dialogue? The reality is: most people are willing to believe evolution, something they don't truly understand or even endeavor to, simply because it affirms their lifestyle. If there ever was an opiate for the masses, it would be evolution.
When a person in a lab coat proclaims evolution as the explanation for the creation of life, and someone who might know basic chemistry but no more, believes it (takes it on faith), no one balks or criticizes. That theory says we can do what we want as long as we don't get caught. Why wouldn't they latch on to such a self-justifying description of life?
The functioning of parietal cells is vividly described in the Gospels, from the "Last Supper", through "Judas' kiss" to Pilate's hand washing.
...
The "Last" Supper: Jesus (water) brings food to the body's hungry cells.
The agony in the garden: Jesus (water) knows that his Father (you) will feel hungry and will eat food.
The three "authorities" initiate the parietal cell's unique process. (as mentioned by dvimus in prior post). They are the priests, the pharisees, and King Herod.
Jesus (water) is kissed by Judas (carbonic anhydrase). Carbon dioxide is present (product of combustion-torches).
Jesus (water) is changed by Judas' kiss and a "certain young man" enters the story. This young man is a proton removed from the water molecule. Judas' soldiers attempt to restrain the young man (proton) but only succeed in retaining his garment (single electron). The young man flees away. (to exit the parietal cell and join with the chloride ion to form HCL)
Jesus is now bicarbonate.
He is judged, finally, by Pilate (the chloride/bicarbonate exchanger) who, at the request of the Jews, releases Barabbas (chloride) into the cell and sends Jesus (bicarbonate) into the blood stream.
No more is said, in the Gospels, about the "certain young man", or Barabbas, which is fitting since they both disappear out of the parietal cell into the stomach.
Jesus' fate, as bicarbonate, is crucifixion between two thieves. Those thieves represent acid and base imbalance. When Jesus tastes the vinegar, he gives up his spirit. In other words, he (bicarbonate) neutalizes excess acidity in the blood. (a crucial function)
[Note for readers from a subsequent poster:
Parietal cells produce gastric acid in response to histamine, via H2 receptors, acetylcholine (M3 receptors) and gastrin (CCK2 receptors). The histamine receptors act by increasing intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate [cAMP], whereas the muscarinic and gastrin receptors increase intracellular Ca2+ levels. Both cAMP and Ca2+ acts via protein kinases to increase the transport of acid into the stomach.]
[Replying to another Christian who thinks the rapture is a lie by Satan]
You really DO NOT know what you are talking about, so you can be forgiven.
The Rapture is one of the few things that Satan cannot emulate because God has made it Copy-Proof.
Satan has copied many things God does to fool and deceive people.
But the Rapture is one of those things Satan CANNOT reproduce or INTERRUPT once it begins.
Carlin was always acting like a bitter old man and people call that "funny." I saw the act "Religion is b. s." and "abortion," and there was no humor, just sarcastic support for his own wicked ways. The "invisible man in the sky" came down and took on human form in the person of Jesus Christ. Yet, Carlin rejected the faith which has as its symbol "a guy nailed to two pieces of wood." Carlin also thought he could improve the ten commandments. Well, first of all, that guy nailed to two pieces of wood wanted to atone for Carlin's sins so he wouldn't be judged by them on the other side of the grave. And with respect to the ten commandments, Carlin perpertrated the idiocy of juwes by observing the letter of the law and ignoring the spirit of the law. For, if you loved God and neigbhor, you wouldn't break the commandments. For love is the heart of the commandments. God says He sees no pleasure in the death of the wicked. Carlin was a foolish man, and we can only hope he repented before he died.
(An Amazon customer review of Expelled)
This film can be an eye-opener to anyone that has bought into the "Evolution is a proven fact" nonsense hyped by those that dedicate themselves to protecting their turf rather than actually seeking the truth. Evolution, in the TRUE meaning of the word IS a proven fact, of course, but the Darwinians always use this statement when speaking of COMMON DESCENT, which is nothing but speculation.
The well established connections of Darwin's ideas to both Eugenics and Nazism is revealed for the first time in a popular format that can cause the general public to see the causitive relationship between this false philosophy and some of the truly evil results of it.
Congratulations, Ben! You did a GREAT job.
Buy this movie!
Show it to your kids!
Show it to your friends!
Give it as CHRISTMAS presents!
This is one of the most important films ever produced.
Frank R. Eggers, you pretty familiar with the passage. but the difference between Christian and false teacher is precisely based on his methodology of studying the Bible. Christian is the one who uses exegesis. And you guys are the ones who rape the Bible in whatever way you want.
When you read newspaper about some local events, do you allegorize, and pick and choose what you like there? Do you allegorize temperature forecast? Why then do you false teachers twist the Bible, when it is PLAIN, and every honest scholar who knows original language will tell you that you're lier?
There is no 'context' or any cultural situation found in the Bible to support your 'queer theology'. It's simply not there. You can wishfully suppress the evidence and create your own pity lies, but this will not change the fact of history. Homosexual Christian is about as possible as square circle. This is so disgraceful, I can not believe people have guts to twist Bible so bad...
[Describing his view of the universe, and how Jesus is... water]
I readily admit that I'm not a scientist. I said that here, early on. What I'm doing is making comparisons between the Bible and things we are familiar with. I hope that others will be able to find sources of new information in the Bible.
For instance, you asked about physics. Jesus said "suffer the little children to come unto me". The traditional view is that children should be introduced to Christianity at an early age. I think that Jesus is really talking about electrons, which if they come to him, water, will result in chemical compounds.
Dalton
[On homosexuality.]
How I would like to just ignore this argument and say, "Who cares"!! But, I came across this discussion and I've felt compelled to have a say....I have to respond as a Christian, born again at that....that I believe in the Creator that made you and I, I believe with all my heart that HE inspired every word written in the Bible, AKA ,Gods Word....and in it, I have read that God is not wanting HIS creations, made in HIS likeness to make love with the same sex ...And seeing as HE knows how we are made and HE knows whats best for HIS creation, He has said, a MAN is not to lie with anothr Man. I believe that means NOT to have SEX with the same gender. ( Last time I looked, shall not is in the negative...) NOW...He did not say you cannot LOVE one another...THAT HE wants for all of us to be part of...however I think HE means to cherish, care for, be tender towards one another not to literally have sex with...I also believe that HE means women are to NOT have sex with another woeman as well...( there's equality in that statement)...He's also stated that He finds homosexuality an ABOMINATION...
SO....since I believe in Jehova, the CREATOR, the ONE who loves each of us and sets rules and commandments up for us to have a MUCH better life and world to live by AND IN...i have TO SAY, i DO NOT AGREE THAT having sex with the same gender, man with man, woman with woman, is the right thing to do....IF you love each other, live together....just don't have sex....I know...I know...how silly is that?...But, its not anymore silly that for people to read Gods words and then say..." H, He didn't mean that"...OR, Well , thats from the OLD testament, that doesn't apply...well...I guess " thou shalt not kill doesn't then, or thou shalt not covet thy neighbors wife, or ...thou shalt not steal, ect....Anyway...Disagreeing with you doesn't make me a haterof people that I don't agree with. THAT would break Gods GREATEST command and that is....Thou Shalt LOVE one another... So, I wish you well....LOVE and peace... have a reat life together.....just don't have sex together...It isn't MY rule...or idea. God thought of it first!! *S*
SO ON ONE LEVEL ALL SINNERS ARE HOMOSEXUALS TO SOME DEGREE PERHAPS
AS THE 3 DEGREES OF SIN IN LUKE 12 BUT PERHAPS THOSE WHO ARE WILLING TO FLAUNT THEIR HOMOSEXUALITY AS BEING BETTER THAN HETER.... ARE ONES WHO KNOW AND DO EVIL AND ARE THUS CONDEMNED TO BE CASTE AMONG THE UNBELIEVERS AND BE TORN ASUNDER AS GIVEN IN LUKE 12
I guess I was looking at a possibility that this would be a great good vs evil type of book. Instead, it is another serious stab at Christians. It was both cliche and sophomoric in nature. Seriously, what else has the world community done over the past fifty years but make Christians look like a bunch of dumb yuk sheeple who would be tricked into the most ridiculous scenarios?
[about the male Central Park Zoo penguins who raised a baby penguin named Tango together]
The book doesn't tell the whole story. Silo the "gay" penguin eventually left Roy for a female named Scrappy. Silo is now happily coupled with a female, which is so heartening b/c it proves that homosexuality can indeed be cured!
As for Tango, she grew up and coupled with a female penguin, which shows how harmful homosexual adoption can be to children. Tango had none of the genes of her adopted parents, but was raised in a homosexual environment and so became a homosexual herself. Homosexuality does not occur naturally, it must ultimately be a choice on the part of the individual. If it occurred naturally in the gene pool, then it would pass away within one generation since homosexuals are incapable of reproducing.
[Review of Harry Potter]
Harry Potter books are written by an actual practicing witch to indoctrinate our youth. These books contain accurate depictions of ritual magic and satanic doctrines. Those who say it's "just fiction" need a reality check! Fiction is the best way to promote occult belief systems! (Just ask Walt Disney. His job as a 33rd degree Freemason was to condition American children to embrace occult themes in entertainment.)
Lots of reviewers who don't know anything about the occult will assure you that this book is not occult doctrine. That's like a blind person telling you there are no misspellings! Here are the facts; look them up on your own and verify. (Of over 5000 reviews, I can't find ONE that states these facts.)
The cover illustration employs overtly satanic symbols include the lightning bolt on his forehead--a Biblical symbol of Satan (who like lightning fell from heaven). There is also the unicorn--a Biblical symbol of the Antichrist (as all witches know). This book promotes drug use--brews with mind-altering fumes using wormwood which in real life contains a hypnotic drug. The series also features demonic possession, necromancy, and divination. Death is described as a great adventure for the occult practicioner--the actual satanic doctrine on death.
Occult numerology runs throughout the book, including the intentional use of 11, 13 and 33 and numbers that break down into those numbers. These are not accidental. The owner of the sorcerer's stone is 666 years old in this book. So the quest is associated with the Biblical number of the Beast. What more do you need?? Non-magical people are described as boring with pointless lives. The glory goes to witchcraft--the gateway into hardcore satanism (according to former high ranking satanists and witches like John Todd and William Schnoebelen.) We need to realize that life is all about a spiritual war and start using better discernment in order not to be manipulated by doctrines of evil. Harry Potter is only one of many that has been revealed. Learn more at cuttingedge.org.
Why is it that many Christians are former atheists and not the other way around?
[In a thread titled "Assassin's Creed is a Pro-Muslim/Anti-Christian Game"]
Entirely ridiculous, more people have died in the name of Atheism than they ever have in the name of religion. We should stop spreading this ignorant notion, acting like its an academic fact. Let's just compare the factual numbers of deaths in oh say, the killing fields of the Khmer Rouge, Hitler's concentration camps, Stalin's pogroms, Mao's 'great' leap forward to things like the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, Salem Witch trials... You might find a great deal of disparity there.
The game is most certainly anti-Christian, and such a shame too. Great graphics, unique concept. Now, this is just my opinion, but it seems the developers could have easily depicted a different setting or era to have essentially the same game. I believe the developers deliberately chose the Crusades in an effort to garner Islamic support for what they believe is the 'new crusade' in Iraq.
Its unpopular today to be a Christian. The war in Iraq is unpopular (at least to CNN and the lemmings that believe every word the Communist News Network says). This game totally capitalizes on this fact. Such a shame, could have been a great game.
What can I say,
The Devil is preety good at covering stuff up. He uses even the best Scientist and astronomers to crush anything spiritual.
Of coarse this book is garbage and I suggest that everyone who likes this book to please take yourself and your scientific thinking out of the box.
In the next coming years people you are gonna see some serious evil spirtual activity and because you have polluted yourselves with closing your mind of to it, you won't know or be ready for the things that are going to occur.
I used data on supernovae from this book to silence the atheists on an aol comment site. When I began to post, I was the only Christian on the board. When I ceased to comment, there were only Christians on the board.
Animal homosexuality is not frequent, and if it existed as some people claim it to be an orientation, each species would soon die out due to lack of procreation. It almost happened to the Romans and will soon happen to various countries around the world, whose populations are shrinking. Homosexuality and abortion are scourges that people bring upon the human race.
I have a niece who is a lesbian. She told her mother that her other grandfather sexually abused her.(not rape but just as abusive sexually) She says since he did that to her she turned away from normal procreation and sex and decided to turn her affection to women.
Then her sister was abused by the same grandfather in the same manner. The sister is quite normal and has had a marriage of 27 years to a good man. A friend in Boston was a lesbian and said she was sexually abused and this made her want men and women. Her grilfriend (lesbian) says her harmones make her have men's desires.
Why wouldn't either girl accept medical treatment for sexual abuse and harmones?
It is a choice. They didn't want to stop it because they got a lot of satisfaction from it. That would be the most honest answer.
If all of you that believe people are born gay and that they should not be judged ,and given the same equal rights and benefits as straight people,then how do you draw the line ? If you actually believe this then what makes them any different than people that molest children,or people that have sex with animals,or dead people were they also born that way ? Both have abnormal sexual behavior,so what makes gays so special ? I bet all you holy rollers would jump right up and condem a child molester.Your logic is all out of whack,but that's ok keep telling yourself your beliefs are flawless.
[God made lesbians who they are. How is it morally wrong to be what God made them?]
oh for God's sake. Being lesbian is a choice. Allllll those people who say "I was just made this way!" are full of crap. That is a total cop-out. Yes being a lesbian is morally wrong, Biblically wrong, and basically wrong in all senses. No matter how hot it is.
The bible doesn't ask that we ignore others' sins, rather it tells us what behavior is sinful, and to avoid it for our own good. It also tells us about how to live for Christ.
The reality is that homosexuals are continually asking for societal affirmation of their behavior. They don't want "tolerance," or to be left alone. They want it up front and center, and praised and taught to school children as morally equivalent to the natural family. I don't seek affirmation or approval of my sins, and I certainly won't affirm and praise the sins of others. Sin requires repentance, not parades.
[ At the end of a short "review" of The God Delusion ]
I ended reading the book in the main preface where Dawkins asks us to "Imagine" there was no religion. Okay, I did -- and shuddered. With no religion, the atheistic dictatorships of the twentieth century would have killed many more than the outrageous number which I have seen estimated around 100,000,000. With no religion, "might makes right". With no religion, slavery would still be around today.
It was at this point that I could not read further. Why should I waste my time?
A major criticism is that Intelligent Design is not falsifiable. However, Intelligent Design is falsifiable by demonstrating that its central claims are false.
The theory of intelligent design says that certain features of biology and the universe are best explained by intelligent activity.
Intelligent design says that these features can NOT be produced by unintelligent activity. All you have to do to falsify intelligent design is to demonstrate that these features CAN be produced by intelligent activity. Below is an example:
CLAIM: Currently, information processing systems are only known to be the product of intelligent activity.
FALSIFICATION: Demonstrate that unintelligent processes can produce information processing systems.
Don't confuse the point: The question is not whether intelligent design has been falsified, it is whether it can, in principle, be falsified at all.
A certain clique of Darwinists seems intent on waging a religious war in the name of the Church of Darwin, fueled by the same kind of fear and paranoia that struck Christiandom in the 19th Century when blindsided by Darwins original "dangerous idea." Except this time around, it's the Darwinists who are ready to burn books and excommunicate scientists they disagree with.
I won't go into all the well-known weaknesses of Darwin's theory. This book is a rather desperate attempt to "re-introduce" the theory to a public that is mostly skeptical of its claims. The book abounds with logical fallacies. One is that a change in the proportion of certain individuals within a population (e.g. bacteria resistant to antibiotics) is somehow PROOF of that population evolving into another species. Yet the actual PROOF is conspicuously missing. The bacteria remain bacteria.
most dismiss the story of noah based solely on the animal episode. usually the arguements are; How could the all animals fit on the ark? Did Noah travel around gathering up the animals? What did they eat? And so on. Most would not ask these questions had they done a little research. Most records (scripture and non-canonical) including myths tell us that the animals CAME TO NOAH. many accounts support one another in this. It is mentioned in Genesis; Jewish legend, early Jewish-Christain texts; and the number of important myths particulary those found in mesopotamia. all these agree that God sent the animals to Noah. This is not as strange as it may sound for the animals also came before Adam in the begining to receive their names...as many records also indicate.
If there is any example of true hatred, it is the gay's hatred of God, His creation, and especially of themselves. Always eager to accuse everyone else of "hating'" they excel at it. Because their lifestyle, by nature, earns no respect, but only revulsion, they need "gay marriage" to bring just a little official recognition to their otherwise perverse behaviour. It would be great for the reprobate state of Californication to simply leave the union and form its own Pink Nation; but that would punish those in the Great Golden State who do not sanction that lifestyle, and who would suffer at the hands of violent fairies.
[from a review of "Why I Rejected Christianity: A Former Apologist Explains"]
The title of this book is a little bit misleading. This guys claims that he was formerly an "apologist." Unfortunately, having a head full of knowledge, answers, etc. does not an apologist make. A true apologist is able to look at the philosophy of atheism (or any other competing worldview/religion) and recognize the internal flaws and inconsistencies of the philosophy.
Atheism is full of poor philosophy (begging the question, special pleading, etc.), and a true apologist would not only be familiar with the objections presented toward Christianity by atheism, but would have an understanding of why the atheist's arguments are flawed. Being familiar with their arguments is worthless if a theologian is unable to explain the internal inconsistencies and poor philosophy.
On to the substance of the book...
As stated in many of the comments here, this is just a guy who threw a temper tantrum when things didn't turn out the way he wanted them to. He blames God for the way God's people act as a result.
Graywolf says:
strawberries taste good.
proves there is a God
proves He loves you
we have to eat
even if all food tasted like poop we would still have to eat it
or is it that plants somehow had a consciousness that made them evolve to taste good
nope the creator made them that way
I've read that doctors in earlier times gained insight about hygiene from Leviticus. It seems Lister was one of those.
I also recall hearing an OB-Gyn once say that it takes longer for a woman's hormones to return to proper balance after the birth of a girl.
A lot of practical information has come from Leviticus.
[Thread topic: The process of intelligent design]
God gave earth a dinosaur period so that we could have oil, gasoline, and polymer hydrocarbons for plastics in the 21st century. If you look at the incredible properties of oil, you whould know God was thinking, "Now how do I get the most energy in the smallest possible density with out them having to know quantum mechanics". You know, oil comes from dead dinosaurs. That was their purpose.
I agree the "liberal" superrich are undermining America, but let us name who the "liberals" are, namely jews and freemasons. The book gives the names of who's who amongst rich jews and freemasons, but doesn't note the pattern. They don't have any problem identifying the mafia as "Italian" but they shrink cowardly from naming the treasonist liberals as jews and freemasons.
[In a discussion about revisions to scientific theory vs. literal adherence to scripture]
That is why there is no room for theories in science.
[Arguing that George W. Bush is, in fact, a Jew.]
Bush celebrates Hanukkah. He eliminates crosses in the white house and replaces them with menorahs. He talks about being a born again Christian even though he's a member of a luciferian cult of Skull and Bones. He constantly gives the satanic salute in public with his fingers like rock stars do. He deceptively calls himself a republican while spreading "democracy." He allows Israeli foreign policy take precedence over American foreign policy. He purports to be fighting a war on terror, yet he leaves an open border with Mexico where terrorists can cross over. Bhutto in Pakistan was assassinted shortly after she exposed Bin Laden was dead. If Bin Laden was dead it renders the war based on a chimera and shows all the film footage as frauds perpetrated by our President.
[In response to: Why do people think Obama is a muslim?]
Most Americans are fairly intelligent. But, I believe facts speak for themselves. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck....Barack Obama is a member of the Trinity church who's mantra is "blacks" not God and loving your neighbor. Their allegence is with Africa..as is Oprah Winfreys. Why didn't she build schools in America for black children????? Their leader/pastor has given a prestigious award to Louis Farrakan who represent the Nation of Islam and openly hates JEWS. This is where the contrast was drawn. He professes to be a Christian...but beware of wolves in sheeps clothing. Will we be able to identify the Anti-Christ??
[34 of 98 people think this post adds to the discussion.]
Christianity is not a religion, as is Atheism (note the capital "A"). "Religion" is man constructing a belief system in search for a creator of the universe. Atheists claim "materialism" or "naturalism" is the creating force of the universe...
Christianity is Creator God revealing Himself to individuals in real time. That is a reality-based experience, not a man-made "story".
When you study science classes part of the course work is devoted to laboratory experimentation. There are no evolutionary experiments to do in biology study. Evolution is a 'theory' of the gaps. Like when a young female student is frightened in the lab by a white rat, she is comforted by the thought that millions of years ago it was a rhinocerous.
Now about my religion. I don't have any. Yes, Christianity has been changed into religion by all those annoying bad guys that have committed atrocities in the name of my sweet Lord Jesus. But I can tell you one thing for sure. The day Christ saved me, I was not the least bit interested in religion.
I'm working on a thesis that demonstrates atheists are victims of self-indoctrination, willing to believe anything rather than reality. What I want to know is the underlying reason for "wanting" God not to exist.
if you did any study at all, you will see that all scholars (except for the nutcase fringe) accept that the Bible has not been changed since its original manuscripts.
[Reviewing the 2007 film, Transformers]
I was only able to watch the first 20 minutes of this garbage before I had to turn off the movie. Presumably it's made for kids, but I think any parent who let's their kid watch this poison is guilty of child abuse. This movie is all about cultural subversion, about the continued destruction of this formerly white Christian nation; the action is only the vehicle for the movie's true purpose. This movie will bombard your child with inappropriate and unnecessary sexual innuendo, anti-Christian jokes (a snide, 'what would Jesus say?' remark by the Jewish actor "LaBeouf"), and other garbage. I'm sure the script writers were choking on their bagels with laughter as they wrote this crap. Not only should you not waste your time and money on this movie, you should be ashamed that you financially supported your own humiliation.