their was no death until adam and eve sinned, so evolution wouldn't be work, if God wanted to use evolution to create the world he couldhave, but you need to know God creates everything right the first time, so evolution is one big fat joke, u feel me dog
[A review of "Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock" for PS2]
Satanic Game
IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR TO PRAISE SATAN, THIS VIDEO GAME IS EXACTLY YOUR BEST CHOICE. I BOUGHT IT FOR MY teenager son, for this first look it is fun, but the most dificult the level is, the most satanic songs are and the graphics, you;ll see the devil killing people. Honestly, we felt bad, and strange things happened to us in two days. Game was returned. I had to click on the stars to rate it, but the rate is -0
Well, though we do adapt, I don't believe in evolution, i think it's a load of bull hockey. at the rate everything has developed in the last 100 years, you really think it took BILLIONS of years to get to here now? i think that's silly. Last time I learned about it, evolution was a theory. Personally, I think it's more probable that God created than we came from a blob of slime.
The Bible has been pretty throughly nitpicked and raked-over for nearly two thousand years now, and there has not been a single contridiction found that has ever been able to stand when explained in its proper Biblical context.
[OP asked atheists to define what they believe without using the word "God"]
E Tims wrote: "I don't believe in anything without having a reason to believe in it."
Again, that's a negative statement of belief. I'm looking for a positive one. For example:
"I believe that human beings are simply a conglomeration of chemicals who evolved ex nihilo."
Is that too hard?
[Review of "Complete Idiot's Guide to Understanding Intelligent Design"]
The authors document the fact that a climate of fear now exists that prevents those who find problems with Darwinism that is not unlike that which existed during the McCarthy era and, until we are able to discuss the relevant issues the controversy will not be resolved, but will intensify.
The ungodly Russian revolution symbolized the triumph of the atheistic agenda in the East. China also fell to the Satanic atheists who controlled this diabolical regime. The hammer and sickle, the symbol of Soviet communism, has been a traditional symbol of the atheist death cult. Its origins trace back centuries. It is the very meaning of this symbol that has been covered up since its beginnings.
These People really Love the Lord
"He that spares the rod (yes, I said ROD) hates his son but he that LOVES HIM IS CAREFUL TO CHASTEN HIM!"
Do you want to skip the "terrible twos"?
Of course you do, How about "Teenage-Rebellion"?
Well I Guess Right? NO! IF YOU DON'T YOU SHOULD HAVE YOUR KIDS TAKEN AWAY NOT IF YOU CHASTEN THEM (biblically speaking)
Now there is a series of books that can help you do just that! Praise GOD
I agree on two points that those who criticize me will say
1) Children need love NOT emotional scars
2) NEVER WHIP IN ANGER NEVER NEVER NEVER! (get the picture?)
But chastening them IS NOT WHIPING IT IS TRAINING
Jason
(14)
P.S. any one who buys into the secular culture in saying that proverbs is wrong as I quoted above, Should have their kids taken away and be put in jail
The Bible teaches that sin poisons everything.
These recent atheist bestsellers are becoming tiresome.
Because people often have a perspective on God that is very similar to their personal relationship with their own father, Atheism is a form of mental illness and emotional distress rooted in a bad relationship with your human father, then projected onto God as the ultimate authority and father figure.
All the most famous atheists have had terrible relationships with their fathers and deeply resent them, are angry at them, etc. Look up Madalyn Murray O'Hair, the woman who got prayer outlawed in public schools--bad father relationship. The same goes for Bertrand Russell, the most influential atheist author of the last century. If you are an atheist, look at your own life. See the pattern?
I know this to be true, because I used to be the same way before I got Saved by Jesus. You can get Saved, too, and you will lose your animosity towards God, and start enjoying your life for a change.
I challenge the reader to research this author, Christopher Hitchens, and find out about his family relations. I have, and I read that he has poor family relations and he drinks way too much alcohol. Is that true? Is this a great mind to be reading, learning from, and following? Not hardly!
Hey, if you want to be an atheist, fine. But if I can expose your children to the truth of the Gospel and the Ten Commandments, and speak the truth of Christ to them, I will, and I shall, and maybe your children will be in Heaven before you, and that's the way salvation works. Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God.
Get a grip, people. We talk of a tolerant nation, but no one is tolerant of Christians. "The nations that reject God are destined to damnation." That's God Word, not mine. If you don't like it, take it up with Him. On the last day of judgment, there won't be any excuses, except one question - what did you do with Christ?
i am confused about the part when you say you are a Chatholic but you believe in evolution as well... ( not arguing just a question) if God created the universe then wouldnt adam and eve be monkeys?
Dave states that evolution is pointless, without goal or purpose. This is what drives athiests to existentialism, bitterness, and early demise.
I would say America contains a number of solid believers, but at this point we are not truly a Christian nation as a whole. Statistics show that only 20% of Americans are in church on Sunday (or Saturday if you prefer). Few are discipled Christians who put God first. America is a big mission field that is in need of more missionaries to proclaim the good news.
Regardless of whether the founding fathers calimes to be Christians or were deists, there is no denying that his nation was founded and achieved its singular position in history based on Judea o-Christian principles, and our decline is directly linked to our moving away from our dropping of "their superstitions" and embracing "knowledge and education instead of bigotry and intolerance", as you put it.
[Why do atheists frequent religion forums?]
My theory regarding this is, that they are hoping someone will engage them in discussion and make a good enough argument that would dissuade them from their atheism, because deep down, they know what they are espousing is not truth.
I don't know of any highschooler ever get a chance to practice Theory of Evolution in the material sense, i.e. make a living out of it, by providing goods or services, but maybe in the moral sense "I'm bigger so I'll bully smaller kids and steal their money".
Just about any other school subject is more useful.
Let students have choices. Those who choose impractical subjects such as TE would have a handicap in life and by natural selection ....
[In response to the question of whether Huckleberry Finn was a better Christian than the apostle Paul]
Interesting post. Exodus 21:32 has YHWH telling us "If the ox gores a male or female slave, the owner shall give his or her master thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned. "
This is important as God himself is setting a monetary value on human life, or at least that of a slave (this chapter is kind of like the fine print after the Ten Commandsments). Therefore, Paul's duty was to either return the slave to the owner or pay him 30 shekels of silver. I'd say Huck Finn was less of a Christian, because he did not give recompense to Nigger Jim's owner.
"First of all, the entire concept of NVC [Nonviolent Communication] is based on the idea that it is a part of human nature to desire compassionate communication with others. This goes against some of my fundamental beliefs as a Christian."
This book has really changed our family and although at first it seems cruel because we are in a society that has strayed so far from the truth that the truth actually seems wrong. But pray and read the scriptures along with this book and the Holy Spirit will reveal the truth if you truly seek it.
I have not found a scripture to support (or not support) the appropriate age at which to spank your children. So I recommend starting at the age that you feel God wants you too. I could never spank my 4 month old but at about 8 months it seems to begin to be helpful but I always did it very lightly on the hand not the thigh or leg.
Wives ARE to submit to their husbands and be obedient them. Husbands are put in authority over their wives. In turn, the husband is to love the wife as Christ loves the Church. Of course husbands are not perfect and have their own flaws. A wife is supposed to be his help-meet, though and offer her own counsel in daily situations. It is not the wife's place to be the spiritual leader of the home, nor should the responsibility of providing for the household fall on her shoulders. Her congregation is her children and her pulpit the kitchen table. She should focus her preaching to the children, not her husband. All the time spent controlling him would be much better spent in prayer. I don't understand why so many women want to be so free of authority in their lives. If you have a problem with obeying your husband, than it's possible that your real beef is with God, since that is the way He designed it all to begin with.
[If a person uses evolution to justify eugenics, the problem is with the person, not evolution.]
you refuse to see the results of your precious theory. eugenics and racism are inherent in the theory. evolution shouts these things out, why do you think the eugenics movement started after the theory of evolution?
deny it all you want, but the truth is still the truth.
The fact that the large part of those who do not believe in the evolution belief argument are not scientists or perhaps college educated is also simply an example of the free mind not overtly influenced and molded by rote textbook learning.
[Evolution is not "used" for anything.]
come on, you know its used for eugenics, racism, and atheism.
It is noteworthy that this book is irreverent toward Jesus Christ and Christians, makes a mockery of conspiracy theorists about masons and jews and has otherwise nothing to say beyond that. Note that it is not irreverent toward jews. And note the publisher is Simon and Shuster. He who laughs last laughs best. If I were uncharitable, I would enjoy a good laugh when these fools are in hell. After all, I highly doubt that they will find hell a laughing matter since they make a mockery of the free gift of salvation in Jesus Christ. I know they will be more unnerved by what I just said here than I will be of what they said in this stupid book.
Dr. Michael Behe is a thorough scholar. Here, he trashes the myth of evolution beyond repair by showing that the simplistic solution evolutionists offer for the physical phenomena of complexity makes grand promises but fails to deliver. Darwinian evolution grew up in an era when science was rather primative in its understanding of biology and chemistry. What is remarkable is that many today continue to employ darwinian evolution to explain chemical-biological aspects of nature. To do so is to underestimate the complexity of nature. When the evolutionist realizes this, he falls back on his blind faith that "time" will somehow manage the process of evolution. Darwinian evolution employed as explanation for complexity in nature is tantamount to using simple arithematic to solve problems only the calculus can solve. It's like using Galileo's telescope to survey the red giants in astronomy. Impossible. Darwinian evolution is a cryptic rationalism because it attempts to use occam's razor to cut away aspects of nature in order to subject nature to your pet theory. To do so is unethical since it is dishonest. But, of course, evolutionists don't believe in morality, so any ethic of integrity escapes them.
According to this book, the author is a lezbo. Did Anne Frank even exist? I don't think so. Why so much tribute is given to this book boggles my imagination. It's not great literature. Its story is likely bogus. The content is meaningless ramblings. So, why celebrate it? To keep the holocaust myth going.
More liberal hand-wringing about human nature. More guilt over the supposed special evil of white people.
First, if a group of white people wants to live by itself without seeing a black face after dark, why is that bad? Who does it hurt? Why would a black person WANT to be in that town,anyway? Second, I can name several "sundown towns" that exist today, where WHITE people are not allowed: Harlem, South Central Los Angeles, etc. And that's okay with me; that's their turf, and they deserve a white-free space and are welcome to it. Third, the idea that white people are especially racist, which this book promotes, is absurd in the extreme. India is 99% Indian. China is 99% Chinese. Mexico is 99% mestizo. Most sub-saharan African countries are 99% black. These appear to be "sundown countries." Very, very few European countries are today 99% white, or even 90% white, if that. Non-whites are flooding into Europe and America, a curious thing to do if whites there are so notoriously racist. Slavery is an ages-old institution which Europeans and Americans led the way in ending. We should be PROUD of our past, not ashamed of it. Books such as this try to exploit white guilt for various reasons, including envy for white success and and excuse for black failure; that's the agenda behind the "history." Ultimately this strategy will fail because it is contra human nature. My prediction is that in the future "sundown towns" will be back in America in a big way, and with no apologies.
[Revelation
17:15
And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.]
Ok - how is that not New York...?
And what about the ships and the sea captains and the center of world trade ...?
Look at the imagery, not what you think you know about history. All those prophetic visions are just that -- they are visuals, like dreams. And like dreams that come true, you can only tell that when they do come true. T
he total destruction of Babylon is the last thing that happens before the final act. But the total destruction is announced by a different angel than the one that announced that " Babylon has fallen, has fallen. In one hour ..."
The second angel drops what appears to be a "huge millstone into the sea." And that is how Great Babylon will be wiped off the face of the earth. Did you ever see what an ancient millstone looks like? It is mushroom shaped...
[on atheists]
I said they have the spirit of the atheist, anti-Christ, anti-God Satan IN them, whether they 'believe' that or not, is immaterial.
BTW, they (we) cannot control this. No one can.
They (we) are in thrall to Satanic spirit . All people here are from the fallen Adamic race are born with this Spirit.
Some fallen humans out-work the inborn spirit of Satan, thus the Criminals and Evangelical Atheists and many others for example.
Others are able to suppress it in false religions, watching sports, being-a-nice-guy (tm), going to a self-congratulating political or peace rally, sporting event, posting on forums, religious debate, idol worship, etc. etc. ad infinitum.
This infestation of Satan's spirit that is originally in everyone has but one cure.
This is humanist/homosexual propaganda at its worst. An attempt to convince young people that same sex relationships are normal and that marriage and the family are to be shunned. Its seethes with hatred toward God, toward the Holy Bible, and toward Christians in general (unless, of course, one is a Christian in name only and goes along with this skewed philosophy). To not allow ones children to read this book would not be censorship, but good parenting. Children don't always recognize poison when they see it, and therefore it is the job of the parents to protect them from consuming it.
(So God created whales with hindlimbs, even though they always lived out in the deep ocean? Pretty stupid God.)
GOD CREATED YOU. WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THAT?
Yes, I'm quite familiar with "The God Delusion." Dawkins not only doesn't believe in God, he does believe there is no hope in this world or any other that he knows of.
His book is linked with mine on Barnes and Noble. Evidently my book rings so true that unbelievers must scurry to the darkness for fear of being overcome by the Light.
Yes Mr.Greenstone you are biblically correct on this. We are In the last days and the rapture Is a breath away. If people aren't ready they will be left behind to contend with the anti-christ and his antics....Look for everyone that has blood In your body...God created you. To believe In the rapture or God Or Jesus Is your choice. He's still God ! Eternity Is a VERY long time to be WRONG........If you decide to jump off a 2 story house,whether you believe It or not you're going down. Because gravity Is real. God Is Real ! It's a dangerous thing to be thrown Into the hands of the Living God.
If you keep laughing at Ken Ham, you may laugh yourself into Hades.
Man is depraived! Completely depraived. Left to our own devices we seek our own needs even at the expense of others. What drives us to reach out and help others? Why do we give to the poor? There is certainly NOTHING Darwinian in helping others. It is by the grace of the Holy Spirit the we feel the twinge of our conscience (which is the Holy Spirit) helping us feel/express compassion, forgiveness, love.
Science is: testable, repeatable, observable.
now that you know what science is you tell me which of the two fit.
1. dogs birth dogs, fish birth fish, humans bith humans, ect.
or
2. dinosaurs birth birds, monkeys birth humans, ect.
You don't need to be brilliant to know that when your wife is pregnant she is going to have a human baby. Not even an atheist evolutionist is foolish enough to expect any thing else. Ask Dick Dawkins if he thinks a the hospital prepares for any other species to be born when a pregnant woman enters. It makes great speculative chat and sells books but in reality when the doctors go to work they don't think twice as to what comes from mom.
Humans giving birth to humans is a testable, repeatable, and observable fact of nature. so why make a theory up to say it happens any other way?
There're so many deterministic sciences (and arts and trades) out there for students to learn, why would TE be taught or a student choses TE?
...
Why TE shouldn't be taught in high school:
1) TE doesn't lend to lab experiment
2) TE is tautology
3) TE is not causal
4) TE is not useful in real life
5) TE is amoral, or can lead to amorality (anything goes kind of mentality)
6) TE may reduce creativity
7) TE language is full of "could" "may"
8) Prerequisites: statistics and probabilities.
9) TE is contrary to every day observations (cat begets cats, cars are made, houses are built)
If we decended from Chimps or Apes or whatever else that they can come up with then why aren't there some of the same physical traits showing up? Why doesn't my cousin Tom not have a tail like a chimp? Why does my daughter not have a nose like an ape? Why does anybody NOT resemble the monkeys? Why isn't one person born with a body full of hair and have a protruding mouth and nose with arms to their feet? Why not just one human?
I know quite a bit about evolution through studies, and it is remarkable to me that it is even a debate. The DNA and chromosome structure of a human being is so complex to think that a monkey evolved into a human is absurd. We have trillions of DNA cells vs. what a monkey carries. We have a spirit and a conscience which clearly animals do not have. That is God-given to humans so that we can connect with God.
I understand humanity is an evolving species made from the seeds of several civilizations (star seeds). Yes, our DNA has been manipulated several times. Not from a God out there, as we all are a part of Source. I in fact have scribed a book on all of this through the process of interdimensional communication. It is not religion! However, we are spiritual beings because we are made up of spirit, energy into matter. We are now finding that our perceptions are being shaken to bring in the higher teachings and knowledge of this universe(s). Once we know the truth of our beingness, we will be set free from limitation. I am finding that there is so much more to us and our creations than we now perceive. My book is called Mystery of the Universes, available through Amazon. There are 80 writings within this book and they cover history, genetics, biology, cosmology, and spirituality. These writings are quite esoteric and I am almost finished putting together a companion workbook that helps one understand these higher teachings.
I do feel that religion has had control over some of these teachings to keep mankind in control. It is now time to loosen these controls. There has been a lot of manipulation going on through the religions as well as through the governments. Keep in mind that even reading the ancient writings, we need to know what the perceptions were of those writing the documents. We all perceive our lives differently and that is what makes life so interesting.
[If I've been "intelligently" designed, then why are my digestive and respiratory intakes linked? If a designer had avoided this, many fewer choking deaths would have occured over the years. ]
Why don't YOU design a plan to separate the digestive and respiratory paths, and then have a plastic surgeon work the plan on yourself. Then, when you have healed up, please tell us all about it.
Excuse me, I do get your point. That's why the idea of Big Bang exists, so it doesn't have to deal with the fossil record or any other record of slow evolution. You seem to miss my point sir. And the multiple exclamation points are not necessary.
The big bang consists of things evolving in big leaps as opposed to smaller ones instead. So the fossil record isn't needed in the big bang theory, and therefore isn't dealt with. It doesn't need to be. I don't appreciate your rudeness at all.
Where is the actual data and proof and evidence that says the very first moment of our universe is billions of years old? Who actually said "I have proof that this universe is billions of years old"? WHat scientific data makes this valid?
Ship all the Muslims out; give them their choice of Muslim paradise to spend their lives. Allah can take care of them, with a side order of Mohammed.
I've learned that liberal, evolution worshiping, global warming, Al Gore anal sucking jerks have a lot of words to say, but little of it is substantive. I try to be brief with my unsubstantive words.
[I don't know any scientist who prays to Charles Darwin.]
That is exactly the point. YOU do not know any, but they are out there.
The zeal by which you pricks attack scientists involved with ID shows without a doubt that your religion is EVOLUTION. It is obviously more than a science (if it is at all a science) to you. It is a way of life, held dear to your heart, sort of like Muslims but without the personal explosive devices.
Of course I group TE into the category of non-essential, fuzzy type of class. I have no issue with TE as mutation but as macroevolution that it's often illustrated in books with morphing of cell to fish to mammal to man. To me at this point it's not proven until scientist can create a first living cell from chemicals and energy, and it's materially not useful, yet spiritually harmful. Scientific methods can be taught without TE. If some says creation shouldn't be taught in school then I'll suggest they don't tell fairy tales to their children, let them read Harry Potter, celebrate Christmas or Easter, or Halloween etc...anything that is not real or proven.
[to a poster who asked for the numbers behind his assertion that the odds of life evolving with no intelligent intervention were essentially zero]
I'm glad your curious mind was attracted by my theory of infinitesimal odds of nature. Hey, it's a theory based on evidence verified by extensive calculations using well-proven formula of stochastic statistics, among other branches of mathematics, and data from gene sequencing work of genetics scientists, data from the Hubble telescope, data from radio-telescopes thru-out the earth, data from human population around the earth, and best of all, data collected from the billion web sites, stored in millions of servers that Google Corp. has graciously provided access. It's repeatable and falsifiable and it has predictive power, and all the other properties a science ought to possess.
Given the sheer volume of data and the advanced level of mathematics that is understood by less than 0.00001% of scientists, I'm not going to annoy people on this forum with a comprehensive therefore lengthy essay.
the only reason that evolution has run away from abiogenesis is that it is such a blow against evolution. either God created life, or it evolved on its own from self-replicating molecules....if life couldn't evolve from self-replicating molecules, then why should anyone believe that life evolves now?
You completely miss the point by asking for evidence: Faith IS the Answer. When I have faith in an afterlife and when I die there actually is an afterlife: I WIN! If you don't accept faith you have NO CHANCE of winning! Exactly like not buying the lottery ticket.