Dancing is a popular form of celebration and partying by all ethnicities. But why is Barack Obama rarely seen dancing, or even allowing and attending dancing. Perhaps I've missed it (please let me know if I have). I know, there was one highly staged politically correct dance with Ellen DeGeneris as Obama was catering to her audience. But where's the rest?
One explanation is that the Islamic sharia disfavors dancing.
(I am fucking disgusted.)
Well, that seems to be it. Obama has been elected. What a surprise that he won in Ohio and Pennsylvania where his ACORN cronies were out in force. I can't be too niggardly with my criticism for the RINOs in Virginia, Colorado, and New Mexico. Democracy as we know it is over and Conservapedia's mission is clearer than ever. We must be one of the last bastions of America until we can take back our country.
[A response to another conservapedia editor for, I'm assuming, not being conservative enough.]
Bolly, you're clueless. There is a direct link between hollywood values and school prayer being censored. No one denys this except liberals who have breast cancer due to abortionist values. In summary, evolutionist style has blinkered you. You have free will to deny my logic.
[Oh and BTW: 'blinkered' is a real word, however it's an adjective, not a verb.]
The science journal "Nature" has endorsed Hussein Obama for President. More evidence that the so called "scientists" are just part of the liberal Hollywood media elite.
(A discussion about "Hollywood Values")
Andy: I've never seen a movie "demonize" drug use. Every movie I've seen that has drug use portrays it as something "cool" people do. As to your support of decriminalizing drugs, well ... that serves to prove my point. A big fan of Hollywood types yourself?
BenHur: *Huge list of movies where drugs ruin lives, cause people to die, and are generally portrayed as bad*
Andy: Liberals think they can fool people by citing unusual examples to deny a correlation. It's indisputable that Hollywood values are highly correlated with drug use, and that movie portrayals of drug use range from something that cool people do to something that is funny. Can anyone think of a movie that presented a sympathetic figure who was then senselessly murdered or seriously harmed by someone hooked on drugs? I can't. Hollywood is in denial about the harm caused by drugs, often to innocent third parties.
(Emphasis added.)
It only takes one counterexample (to disprove evolution). Number one in the list -- beautiful autumn foliage -- is enough. The foliage existed before man does, and beauty does not help the trees in the slightest. The theory of evolution is confounded by the beauty, and the best it can say is it happened by chance. But such beauty does not happen by chance
The article says that [Obama's] sister (I think stepsister, actually, but I'm not sure) said the whole family was Muslim. It says that Obama studied the Koran extensively, and only a Muslim would do that.
(Referring to Wikipedia and it's founder Jimmy Wales)
["What relevance does saying Wales is an atheist have? The website is not atheist and covers all ranges of topics, so I don't understand why this has any place in the first sentence of the article."]
Because atheist = bad.
(Should we ban atheists from Conservapedia?)
I will side with the answer Yes, but have reservations. Me more than anybody wants liberals out-of-here. But I realize us conservatives have more to learn about 'them'. Though, this requires a tremendous effort to monitor their asinine postings. I feel the same can be said for atheists, which also tend to be liberal. We can learn from their stupidity but at a cost to slowing the development of a highly credible website.
(Read the rest of that page, and then realize that these people vote.)
In many ways, Conservative style is the antithesis of the style adopted by Liberals.
The style of a conservative often includes these characteristics:
-A willingness to debate openly on all aspects of an issue or problem, without being tramelled by ideological preconceptions.
-Readiness to take responsibility for the consequences of ones words and deeds.
-Not using fluff or obfuscating but telling it as it is.
-Behaving with decency towards other people, and treating the opposite sex with respect.
In 1997, the researcher Gundlach studied the issue of childhood sexual molestation in respect to lesbians and according the medical researchers Gundlach found the following:
"Gundlach (1977) surveyed 225 lesbian and 233 heterosexual women, and found that 30% of the heterosexual women and 21% of the lesbians had been raped. Of the 30 women who had been raped before the age of 14, 26 had an adult homosexual orientation while 9 had an adult heterosexual orientation."
[I'm skeptical of any "medical researcher" that adds up 26 and 9 to be 30]
Medical professionals emphasize that they do not know what causes mental illness.[8] Accordingly, they cannot rule out that liberal indoctrination is a contributing factor.
Teaching children to accept and believe things that are demonstrably false cannot help mental health. Included in this category are the liberal teachings in school that:
*lying about the truth, causing belief in falsehoods or encouraging conduct disorders[9]
*there are no real differences between boys and girls
humans are just another type of animal
*all there is is what you see
*conversely, that an unproven 'unconscious' excuses evil actions
*self-inflicted death can somehow be good
*denying self-defense, mentally and physically
*denying the ability to control sexual desires; promoting lifestyles that lead to mental illness
*insisting on an illogical and unjustified "wall of separation of church and state"; classroom prayer would promote mental stability
Medical professionals emphasize that they do not know what causes mental illness. Accordingly, they cannot rule out that liberal indoctrination is a contributing factor.
Teaching children to accept and believe things that are demonstrably false cannot help mental health. Included in this category are the liberal teachings in school that:
* lying about the truth, causing belief in falsehoods or encouraging conduct disorders
* there are no real differences between boys and girls
* humans are just another type of animal
* all there is is what you see
* conversely, that an unproven 'unconscious' excuses evil actions
* self-inflicted death can somehow be good
* denying self-defense, mentally and physically
* denying the ability to control sexual desires; promoting lifestyles that lead to mental illness
* insisting on an illogical and unjustified "wall of separation of church and state"; classroom prayer would promote mental stability
Liberal ideology claims another victim: a prodigy in many fields and a recipient of the liberal MacArthur "genius" grant, Professor David Foster Wallace bought into the liberal ideology and subsequently killed himself at age 46. See our Mystery:Do Liberal Teachings Cause Mental Illness?
The word Lie-beral is often used to refer to liberal activists who value deceit and lies above truth and fairness. It is a portmanteau word.
Tellingly, there is no such coinage related to conservatives --- because there is no use for one!
Public school culture is a culture fostered in public school,[1] which is characterized by:
* complete censorship of any classroom prayer
* a lack of commitment to respect the religious civil rights of students has resulted in "religion-free zones." [2]
* sex education, homosexual curriculum and sexual abuse by school personnel has been referred to as a "red-light district" for students [3]
* a culture of incompetence [4][5]
* fashion that includes black (Goth) clothing
* facial piercings and rings, tattoos, and male earrings
* depressed demeanors
* an absence of objective morality; instead, a principal will say someone "made the wrong choice"
* a sense of hopelessness
* a lack of critical thinking about liberal indoctrination
* compulsive profanity
* general inability to look someone in the eye
* extreme anxiety
* feeling that it is funny to be dumb
* being so accustomed to censorship of ideas that there is genuine surprise when someone actually says something unfamiliar or politically incorrect
* lack of awareness that prayer is censored in public schools and that teachers' unions are very liberal
* alcohol and drug abuse
* disrespect for teachers
* bullying
* gang activity [6]
* prostitution
* homosexuality [7]
Liberal police force ignores blasphemy; Christian sues
A Christian activist is bringing a private prosecution for outraging public decency against an art centre in Gateshead, north-east England, after the local police force in the socialist-controlled region declined to take action. Christian Emily Mapfua (40) was outraged by the decision of the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art to display an obscenely-modified statue of Jesus as so-called 'art'. But Northumbria Police declined to act on her complaint, so Emily is going it alone. Well, not quite alone, as we suspect all Christians and people with any decency at all will support her.
Barack Obama lets the truth slip out that he is a Muslim: "John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith"
Taqiyya allows a Muslim "to deny or denounce his faith if, in so doing, he protects or furthers the interests of Islam."
In regards to atheism and evolution, a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs methodological naturalism since World War II have been atheists. Creationist scientists assert that the theory of evolution is an inadequate explanation for the variety of life forms on earth.
Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debates and many debates have been held since the 1970's, particularly in the United States.
Darwinian evolutionary theory, at least in the mind of John Q. Public, is the number one argument for atheism.
[Comment on article about Egypt "The earliest known archaeological record of human culture in Ancient Egypt dates to between 13,000 and 9,000 B.C"]
Given that the Earth is only 6000 years old, this is not possible. -PFoster-
I agree. This anti-Biblical bias should be corrected. At the very least, the materialist perspective should be complemented with the Christian view. Really, this is supposed to be Conservapedia, not Oldearthpedia. -Brtkrbzhnv-
Yes, it's unreasonable to assume that atheism does not just happen. Scientific evidence and logical reasoning are not sufficient to give rise to atheism. Some event must have caused atheism such as; abusive upbringing, use of antidepressants, partial insanity, certain additives and toxins in food such at BT, ERDA, amoxicilin and other substances known to contribute to improper executive function of the human brain.
These are all neutral cases that show the causation of atheism and prove it is a consequence of mental deficiency.
Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. (allegedly born in Honolulu,[1] August 4, 1961) is the presumptive 2008 nominee of the Democratic Party for president.[2] Obama has served as a freshman Democratic Senator from Illinois for three and a half years. In 2007, Obama was the most liberal Senator.[3] If elected, Obama would be the first Affirmative Action President.
To counter the view by many that Obama is an elitist, he began running campaign ads claiming that he "worked his way through college and Harvard Law."[4] In fact, Obama apparently did not hold any jobs during college and law school, and he would have likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students.
Homosexuality Quotes:
- "We want your children. Give us your children." - Homosexual activists at the Hamilton Square Baptist Church riot
- "They are after me. It's me they want." - Terrified 9 year old boy on the way home from the Hamilton Square Baptist Church riot
[From Conservapedia's actual definition of Quote Mining:]
Quote mining is a pejorative term, not recognized by dictionaries, which expresses objection to using someone's quotes against him. While the entire fields of law and politics encourage quoting an adversary to discredit him, evolutionist do not feel their quotes should be used against them and have invented the term quote mining to criticize that practice.
[Quote Mined!]
[From a debate on whether or not "bias in Wikipedia hampers reliability."]
"I think that bias does at times impair Wikipedia's reliability. Truth be told I think that the same thing is beginning to occur on Conservapedia."
[Understatement of the Millenium!]
One could argue whatever one likes, but the evidence favours the view that science would not exist if it were not for Christianity.
Philip J. Rayment 22:29, 21 January 2008 (EST)
Liberal politics destroyed the thriving Christian churches in Massachusetts. In other parts of the world, politically driven Islam has overtaken Christianity and virtually abolished it.
Abortion, which is mostly driven by politics, has devastated Christian families in many parts of the world, especially England and the northeastern United States. Same-sex marriage, which is also politically driven, has caused ripped apart the Anglican and other Christian churches. Addictions such as gambling and pornography, which are also politically driven, have have devastating effects on Christian churches and families.
In some cases, billions of taxpayer money is used by government to erode and destroy Christian values, as in some of the curriculum taught in public schools. It is entirely up to Christian churches to identify, expose and combat these indirect attacks on Christianity. In Democratic states where the government-subsidized attacks on Christianity have been most severe, Christian churches have already lost much in support by not responding to this challenge.
"Science" is a human method of determining truth. The Bible is a Divine method of revealing truth. Thus, where science and the Bible conflict, it is because science is flawed.
The theory of evolution is just that, a theory. It has not been proved and it never will be. There is no need to investigate this topic using "science" when it is clearly answered in Genesis. Furthermore, science is a manifestation of the devil fabricated to undermine God and his beautiful gift to all mankind. My advice to you my Christian brother is: Love your god and your country in that order and never doubt the decisions of either.
You'd have to be crazy to do something which you know is forbidden in the Bible, and then like the adulteress, "wipe your mouth and say you have not sinned". Denial of the sinfulness of homosexuality is part of the insanity of it all.
[Just so you know, not everyone believes in your Bible. You'd have to be crazy to believe that everyone does.
Loads of sane people sin. Sex before marriage, murder greed, etc.]
Furthermore, it is a development disorder which begins in early childhood. Attempts to consider it "normal" are politically and ideologically motivated.
Homosexuality comes from unhappiness within the family and leads to further unhappiness when embraced. It's like a facial defect (such as a cleft palate) which could be corrected with plastic surgery.
Gay rights activists complain that society's refusal to accept them as they are and to okay their sexual activities, is the only thing that stops them from being happy. But this is a foolish falsehood. Within the "gay community", the murder rate is high, The murder rate is 15 times higher among homosexuals than heterosexuals. and even in "gay enclaves" like Provincetown, Massachusetts where there is no societal disapproval at all the rates for depression, suicide, Since homosexuals have greater numbers of partners and breakups, compared with heterosexuals, and since longterm gay male relationships are rarely monagamous, it is hardly surprising if suicide attempts are proportionally greater. drug abuse, etc. are much higher than normal.
Homosexuality is not a normal way of being. It was not created or intended by God. It is a sin and a mental illness
Why ask why, everything evil is bad. I am against homosexuality, I am not against the person who leads the lifestyle. I am against the promotion and education of our youth to homosexuality. This is just a fad and like all fads, glorifing homosexuality will pass. The promoters have no reason to hide in the closet anymore. They will not rest until it is a protected civil right, equal as heterosexuals. Push push push of the movement has its limits and it is starting to back fire. Front and center in the culture will be its downfall. You will be called a racist for taking a stand against homosexuality. I say, the racists are the intolerant homosexuals who can give a damn about how others feel, only themselves, only their agenda.
Michael, you wrote, "Teachers and students should be allowed to pray together, why do you want a teacher leading the entire class in a prayer?" Answers include:
* it worked for hundreds of years
* it clears the minds and emotions for the learning to follow
* it instills respect at a time when it is needed
* it offers the opportunity to pray for a classmate in need
* the teacher and students want to do it, and it builds collegiality
* there is no legitimate reason to censor it (hatred of religion is not a legitimate reason)
Do I need to list more reasons?
[Some students may not be religious.]
So what? Often the entire class does welcome the prayer without any objection. And in the rare case there is someone who objects, surely you don't think one person can censor everyone else just by saying he doesn't like something.
[Isn't this [referring to slavery] the least noble aspect in American history? What aspect could be less noble than owning another man and his children?]
Killing unborn babies?
The Warren Court was prominent for engaging in judicial activism or, in a stronger version of the term, judicial supremacy. The judicial supremacy of the Warren Court claimed that segregation was not constitutional in the case Brown v. Board of Education and so therefore unilaterally destroyed an institution that was an integral part of society and widely supported in the areas where segregation was legal. The Warren Court imposed its political opinions, forcing schools to become desegregated. This action caused minorities in the United States, specifically African-Americans, to be legally equal with white Americans. This type of judicial supremacy is typical of liberal courts trying to give every person in the United States their rights and liberties guaranteed in the constitution. If the Warren Court had practiced Judicial Restraint, they would have seen that the U.S. constitution and its amendments do not specifically state any requirements regarding education, therefore, the supreme court has no official powers over the states' ability to regulate and maintain their respective educational services. African-Americans were not denied access to public education and so therefore the ruling by the Warren Court is judicial supremacy at its worst.
To me, the Gospel of John was vandalized by the liberal adulteress story, which is used today to oppose the death penalty, make light of promiscuity, downplay Hell, and undermine Christian teaching about tasking for and receiving forgiveness. The story pretends to be an eyewitness account, but was added long after all the eyewitnesses had died. No big deal: I'd do the Lord's work by "reverting" the vandalism.
[Didn't see this on the main page, but it looks like Senator Kennedy may have suffered a stroke. May our prayers be with him and his family.]
As much damage as he's done to this country, you'll forgive me if I don't pray too hard.
[On Conservapedia's page on the Westoboro Baptist Church, they used to be described as 'liberal leftist Democrats'...]
Phelps wouldn't be that bad if he only protesting homosexuality, its his disrespect of American troops that makes me mad. - Konservativekanadian
[...]
Of course they're liberal. They hate America. They say "God Hates America". Who cares if they also say that God hates fags? Who cares if they're also doing God's work by picketing fag churches? Hatred of America is liberal, period. The admins were right to lock the page. You seem to forget that children are reading this site, and they might be confused if we give then too much conflicting information. - MissAmerica
(when asked how Christians know that the Bible is definite truth)
What makes you think that we "assume" that the Bible is definite truth? We believe it for many good reasons, and this is not the place to detail all of those. But the Bible has been researched more than any other ancient book, and surviving manuscripts have been compared to see what, if any, changes have occurred. The Dead Sea Scrolls included copies of parts of the Old Testament considerably older than any other extant copies, and these showed that very little had changed (and nothing of significance). Further, we know that the Jews revered (what Christians call) the Old Testament so highly that they went to great lengths to ensure that new copies were identical to the documents they were copying. Not all the writers are known for certain, but we have confidence that the writings of Moses were indeed written by him, partly because Jesus (Who is God and does not make mistakes) referred to them as such.
Benefits of Abstinence
Peace of mind in your life and future relationships, and marriage.
More self-respect and more respect for each others and respected by other people.
Longer lasting relationship. Premarital sex surprisingly breaks up more dating couples than any other factor.
You don't have to put yourself under someone else's mercy not to reject you. It's still a fact, that the more "experienced" guys and girls are generally less desirable and less respected as dating or marriage partners.
Realize there is a 98 percent chance you will never marry the person you date in high school, so it is always better to keep yourself pure for the right person, that is your future wife or husband. [6]
It's a fact[5] that persons and couples who have premarital sex are more likely to have extramarital affairs as well.
From the Barack Obama article on Conservapedia:
"He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action."
Liberals refuse to allow even the possibility of certain conservative views, and this reflects a liberal close-mindedness that is not shared by conservatives. Liberals categorically declare something to be impossible, such as changes in the laws of physics over time
I took my family to see Expelled last night, and I was surprised at how liberal and obscene it was. They don't mention anything about how Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior, and they include secular music from "The Killers" (how could you allow a band with that name to be included in a Christian movie?) and John Lennon. I thought I would not have to cover my kids eyes and ears for once in a movie theater, but I was proved wrong with this one. I guess the next time a documentary comes out exposing the evil of evolution, I will stay home with my family and watch Passion of the Christ instead. At least that movie has a strong Christian message.
The great intellectuals in history such as Archimedes, Aristotle, St. Augustine, Francis Bacon, Isaac Newton and Lord Kelvin did not propose an evolutionary process for a species to transform into a more complex version.
Despite my best efforts to convince him, my husband has forbidden me from contributing anything at all to this project.
Not only has he made it clear to me that I'm not to add any more content to this encyclopedia he wants me to delete the sum of the edits I have made thus far.
I told him that once the edits are made I had no control or rights to have the edits rescinded. He accused me of not being willing to submit to his authority as the head of our household...after much prayer and soul searching I came to the same conclusion.
While it breaks my heart, I must ask that the entirty of I Samuel be deleted.
I sincerely pray for this wonderful project, I ask the Lord Jesus Christ to continue using this blessed venue to unceaselessly proclaim the Truth and to fight the forces of evil that subvert the righteousness that (once) made America great. It is only with God that our country can ever have a chance to reclaim the souls of our children.
Blessings upon you all and peace from our Lord Jesus Christ.
Here is a growing list of logical contradictions in atheism:
atheists say they do not believe that any God or equivalent deity exists, but then are often hostile to Christians, as in censoring classroom prayer even when everyone wants to participate.
Atheists often feel that they are well qualified to comment on school curricula, in effect advising others how to raise their children, while refusing to admit that others are more qualified to tell atheists how to raise their own children with regards to religion.
(add more)
The Center for Disease Control says 25% of American teen girls has a sexually transmitted disease: [20] But 0% of those who practice abstinence are affected.*
[Then, in small type:]
*—not counting a very small number who acquire such diseases in other ways.
Atheistic denial is the tendency of atheists to deny obvious truths, such as:
1. the existence of love beyond chemical reactions in the brain
2. the far greater achievements of Christian scientists compared to atheistic scientists
3. how atheism is the ideology of public schools
4. how many atheists ultimately go insane or commit suicide
5. how materialism fails to explain basic phenomena, such as bird migration
If you told me that liberal teaching promotes homosexuality, I would have to say hell yes it does. Not only does it promote but encourage such thoughts. Animals do it? WTF? So it is ok for humans? Boy, America is so messed up.*** Thousands upon thousands of years, homosexuals were looked at as deranged individuals. Now, our generation is so smart, smirk. Eventually, the homosexual movement will die out without reproduction. But at the same time, we must not let our youth be indoctrinated to this evil.
Religion? No, lets make this quite clear: Not all religions are equal. Christianity should play a large role in modern society, as God intended, for it is the Truth. But the abomination of Islam should be wiped out, destroyed by force if nessicessary - both for its constantly earthly attrocities and oppressions, and for leading people from Christ and thus damning them eternally. To speak of 'religion' lumps all religions together. Christianity is good, everything else is bad, and any christian who doesn't realise this just hasn't yet realised that by the fundamental tennants of Christianity they are allowing people to literially go to hell in the name of freedom.
First and foremost, the Holy Bible clearly states that "man shall not lie with man as he lies with woman" and declares that Homosexual offenders should be put to death. I believe that the Bible is the inerrant word of God, and His commands must be kept. However, I do not think that todays government would be able to keep them all as it would be impractical. I do think that the government should and is capable of passing at least some legislation to protect us from the negative effects of the homosexual agenda and lifestyle, and I think that at the very least that reparative therapy should be mandatory.