www.amazon.com

Doctor Michael J Olivieri #fundie amazon.com

MaryAnn H. says:
Yes, there is a woman (unless she has already died) waiting in a hospital to die with her unborn, badly malformed fetus who can not have a legal abortion. The doctors all concur that the fetus can not survive but they are prohibited from aborting it to save her life. So all these fine religious folks will stand around proclaiming "god's will" and watch her die.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They said the same thing about Helen Keller who has enriched the lives of so many--ever hear of her? Nah. You probably emigrated from Nazi Europe & thought she was euthenasized. Also, that lady can take a short ambulance ride to another meat market where they'll make dog food out of the baby.

goblue #fundie amazon.com

Please present the evidence that inorganic molecules chemically evolved into DNA - oh and include evidence of where the information within DNA came from and what journal article you have that demonstrates evidentially how "nature" does the selection and sequencing entropy word to get from base pairs to DNA with the information intact.

Amar #fundie amazon.com

Precisely. Every one of our quotodian existence comes with its angst. Any belief or disbelief should address the ways and means of doing that. Theism, however flawed, does it. Atheism is a big ZERO in this.

Gaylen #fundie amazon.com

Intelligent design isn't a Science.

Oh really. So it is not important to find out what spirits are? It is not important to understand what life really is? It is not important to find out who created DNA? Things that can't be explained should not be researched?

Anthony L. #fundie amazon.com

Everyone is NOT an atheist. There is only one, true God. All others are fake, delusions. Not believing in something that does not exist is not atheism.

I am the LORD your God, and I only shalt thou serve.

Brad Watson, Miami #fundie amazon.com

YHWH(64=Y25+H8+W23+H8) / the Grand Architect of the Universe (G.A.O.T.U.[64]) uses the elegant(64) mathematical model of GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 to planit.

The PlanEt Nestor is our 'next-door neighbors'. Humans have a nest or colony there. Google: Planet Nestor and 'coincidentally', some guy named Nestor has started a comic book called that!

,

Non-coincidental synchronic reaction: 5/21/13 16:25 "Miller 64, Miller 64!" ad, "It's not just a number, it represents a man..." - ad, "careful though, that kind of power can go to your head" - Progressive ad on ESPN 2

James Arjuna #fundie amazon.com

Evodelusionism is the religion of atheists, sex addicts, murderers, Monsanto, big pharma, socialists, communists, liberals, whores, and perverts...basically all those who are destroying all life on earth like evolution.

You think you are a scientist, but you are just the spokesperson for the most disgusting religion that has ever plagued humanity.

There are three absolutes in the DNA RNA process that cannot be overcome by evolution. Therefore evolution is a myth.

1/ RNA cannot make DNA without DNA to produce the original coding. They are simultaneously needed to produce eukaryotic life. There is no physical evidence of any RNA only creature making DNA.

2/ It is impossible for the human immune system to evolve when the pathogens that destroy digest human cells already existed before the first "human" cell.
It is impossible for any of the original life forms to exist based on this. The creatures needed to be built having an integrated immune system to deal with all pathogens and even radiation from sunlight that causes cancer cells that need to be destroyed.
Cancer is an immune deficiency disease.
Here is a video of how cancer cells are supposed to be destroyed by the immune system.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJSrxzatNzY

3/ DNA only shows genetic degradation and nothing else. Science does not operate differently in the past than now. Science has no magic in it.
http://evolutionsciencenow.blogspot.com/2013/04/are-humans-getting-better-what-is.html

Every year 30.4 million people die from Evodelusionism and immorality.

crbrown #fundie amazon.com

What I see here is simply an overly used anger driven "list" of reasons that are supposed to make followers of Christ feel like fools for believing what they believe. And if they feel foolish, or as the author's say many times "stupid", then they will end their foolish system of belief.

If that were the case, Christianity would end as he says. Unfortunately, he is missing one vital point, Christians do not just believe in an idea, or even a collection of ideas. They believe in a personal God, one that they communicate with. And yes, to make the foolishness even more foolish, He talks back to them! Debating the legitimacy of the idea with people who already "know" God will fall on deaf ears. True Christians do not "choose" Christianity out of a list of viable options based on how logical it is, but realize that God has chosen all. The very basis of faith in Christ is based on the understanding that man's logic is already flawed. Unlike what the author thinks, most Christians are very aware of 1 Corinthians 2:12-14:

Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, so that we may know the things freely given to us by God, which things we also speak, not in words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit, combining spiritual thoughts with spiritual words.
But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised.

If there is anything that upsets an atheist, it is this understanding. You cannot argue or reason against it. A list of "logical" reasons will not move a true Christian away from His faith. The only thing that will move a Christian away from His faith is if Gods (Spirit) no longer speaks to his heart in the depths of his soul. Those that are convinced of these arguments and moved away from their faith do not know God personally and have placed their faith in the "ideas" of Christianity, not in Christ, so they are easily drawn away by "natural reasoning".

The authors also fail to realize that conversion comes when God speaks to the heart first, then a "change of heart" occurs, and everything radically becomes different. Christianity no longer looks foolish, but becomes their very own salvation. Hence 1 Corinthians 1:18:

[ The Wisdom of God ] For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

Nice try, but not dead yet...

Rober O adair #fundie amazon.com

From a Christian perspective, logical thinking is intrinsically connected to the ultimate reality of God and His nature. Thus in a profound sense "The real is rational and the rational is real." This also explains why Classical Humanists were able to reason from the facts of nature to the existence of God as in Aristotle's Cosmological argument, which is irrefutable. The work of the Holy Spirit is still necessary to effect salvation by changing the hearts of unbelievers, but there is a great deal that fallen man can understand if he wants to. The Classical Humanists seriously wanted to know the truth and learned a great deal, evolutionists are are, for the most part, foaming at the mouth fanatics incapable of rational thinking as witnessed by the fact that there are no logical arguments for evolution, it's all blind faith.

Daniel J. Haggerty #fundie amazon.com

(a review of a book that claimed Christianity invented Freedom and Science that is so filled with errors its laughable)

The first paragraph alone is worth the price of this book. The paragraph clearly states the question that every educated person must frequently ask himself, but avoids discussing in public, i.e., why did other societies not advance as did the West? I have never seen an adequate treatment of this question.

Recently "Guns, Germs and Steel" by Jared Diamond claimed that geographic determinism is the dominant factor controlling cultural development. While one of the most interesting and entertaining books I have read in years, GG&S fails to convince, most notably in the case of China, the progress of which Diamond says was severly attenuated due to "Beaureaucratic" reasons. This is an insuffiecient answer. As Stark would say, the question needs to be asked, why did the beaureaucracy do this?

(As I have always wondered, why did the Chinese invent gunpowder, but not develop guns or cannon?, paper but not the printing press, books and a system of libraries?)

If readers can set aside our culturally sanctioned prejudices against Christianity and especially Catholicism, and approach the book with an open mind, they will be immediately captivated as I was from the first few sentences. Truly one of the most illuminating and rewarding books I have ever read.

Saint and sinner #fundie amazon.com

The above atheist is obviously quite ignorant about the difference between vicious circularity and simply being consistent. Both are circular reasoning. However as Van Til pointed out, only the Theist's worldview (in the classical sense which would include Divine Revelation) a) does not self-destruct (internally inconsistent with itself), b) is not destructive of epistemology (it destroys the possibility of knowledge), or c) is not arbitrary (based on the universalizing of a particular experience or speculative metaphysics).

Atheism usually fails (a) when it is in the non-nihilist form since universal and immutable ethical laws are only possible with a omnipresent, omnipotent, and immutable Being who can reward or punish all men according to their deeds. (Indeed, all non-Theistic worldviews fail this test.)

Atheism fails (b) since it places the origin of man's cognitive faculties in an impersonal, non-teleological, stochastic process of neo-Darwinian evolution which means that man's faculties are survival oriented and not necessarily truth oriented. In fact, the degree to which they are truth oriented is probably zero or inscrutable at best. This would undermine or destroy the possibility of warranted true belief. (Indeed, all non-Theistic worldviews fail this test since they place the origin of mind in a non-teleological, impersonal universe.)

Atheism fails (c) since one cannot logically derive a universal from a particular experience, and one has no epistemic warrant for believing in a universal based on philosophical speculation. In order to have epistemic warrant to believe in a certain universal, one must possess complete knowledge of the universe and how all particulars of the universe relate to each other. For this to be the case, one must be omniscient OR have this universal revealed to him by an omniscient Being. This necessitates propositional Divine Revelation. (Of course, all non-Theistic worldviews fail this test since they lack propositional Divine Revelation.)

Thus, the greatest proof that God exists is that without Him, everything would be absurd.

Vann R. Duggins #fundie amazon.com

So we are all here (In theory) by accident?
Is the earth an accident?
Is the internet an accident?
Is this Blog an accident?

So if there is not a creator would not everything have to be an accident? How to calculate the odds that the words on this blog were an accident of the big bang.

A Customer #conspiracy amazon.com

WAKE UP! This is a lousy movie!,

This review is from: It's a Wonderful Life [VHS] (VHS Tape)
This movie never won any awards. It was so bad that the studio could hardly give it away when they first puit it on tape, then they let it be colorized just so they could sell SOME copies of it, and suddenly the big war cry from the Hollywood liberals was -- "OOH! Save a classic black and white film!" Baloney! No one liked this movie when it was made. No one liked it the 1950s. No one liked it in the 1960s. No one liked it in the 1970s. No one liked it in the 1980s, then SUDDENLY! -- it's an American classic. NOT! It's Communist propaganda about the "evils" of American free enterprise from a guy who made a lot of pinko films but never thought HE should have to live like this "common man" he kept making pictures about.

Christopher Haynes #fundie amazon.com

Creationists, our point is this:
By the standards of science, the "Law of Supernatural Abiogenisis" is the "established" science:

here is the law:
"In the absence of devince intervention, life cannot exist in a bounded and initally lifeless system."
We dont say this law has been proved.
Indeed, Scientific Laws cant be proved.
The Conservation of Energy. That cant be proved.

We only say this:
A law like the Conservation of Energy becomes established science, when all efforts to falsify it have failed.
Since Proof is imposible in Science, Failure to Disprove (Failure to falsify) is the standard used throughout science.
Its the standard that makes the Law of Conservation of Energy, which cant be proved, the established science.

Thus the Law of Supernatural Abiogenis is established science, by the standards of science.
It is in principle falsifiable.
To falsiy it, do this: Demonstrate Naturalisitic Abiogenisis.
Just what our Atheist friends assure us is possible.
They need to. For them its a mortal issue. If the Law of Naturalistic Abiogeneis is correct, Atheism itself must be false.

But too bad. All efforts to falsify it have failed.
An international effort, of 100 years, involving the worlds top gurus, including several Nobel Prize winners.

The Law of Conservation of Energy
Never falsified = Established Science

Law of Supernatural Abiogenisis
Never falsified = Established Science
Why not?

Brad Watson, Miami #fundie amazon.com

The "7 Seals" are 'beyond Einstein theories' that symbolically lock the "book/scroll" prophesied in the Bible's last book: The Revelation 5:1-10:10. This 74-page booklet is entitled 'There Are No Coincidences - there is synchronism'. The seals/theories are on its cover along with some very symbolic artwork that satisfies the prophecy in the Qur'an 75:6, "When shall be the 'Day of Resurrection'? When the eye is dazzled, and the moon is eclipsed, and the sun and moon are brought together."

The "7 seals"/theories are known as follows including short descriptions...

Seal #1: The Conglomerate of Nonparallel-Universes Theory (Universe Creation Theory)
"In the beginning"... This theory explains what happened before the Big Bang and what will happen after this universe's possible demise billions of years into the future. The Guardin' of Eden story took place c. 4,000 BC through extraterrestrial intervention with the 'God guy' cloning himself to produce Adam, then again to produce Eve. (Humans existed elsewhere & Earth is 4.55 billion-years-old.) The near future should bring confirmation of ETs and their history with global cultures. Advanced technology and wormholes (Einstein-Rosen bridges) should eventually provide interuniversal travel. Note: It appears that this universe creation theory is now accepted by over 50% of astrophysicists.

Kimberly Weninger #conspiracy amazon.com

[In an Amazon review of "Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All".]

As an alternative health person; I find this book to be an outrage; that the public needs to know the facts about vaccines and that this author is one of the most uninformed; even dangerous men to the health of America.
I can understand his attitude; brainwashing is a rampant problem in our medical society but to take our FREEDOMS away is socialism; plain and simple.
You wanna shoot yourself and your kids and grandkids up with thousands of poisons; be my guest. But I for one will be the first person in a very very long line of people that will stop you from making your dreams of a vaccinated world a reality.

W. Pope #fundie amazon.com

You made a mistake in logic. You say that "God" cannot be proven or disproven. This is a contradiction in terms. If God cannot be disproven, then He is proven. If He cannot be proven, then He is disproven. You can't have both. You must first define what God is before you can analytically prove his existence. God is defined as the "first being." Now we have to define what a "being" is. A being is an entity, and an entity is an autonamous functioning system that percieves, contemplates, chooses, and acts. We are beings, and if you don't believe that there is no reason to discuss further.
Since only beings act, then the first nature must be a being. To start at the first nature, you must start at nothing. Nothing does not exist. It is like the point. The point is an idea, but can't be drawn or decribed except as a beginning. So nothing is not, therefore life is. This is the beginning of the 0-10 fundamental principles which progress into the concept-reality progression. This is what half of my book 2016 The Final Revelation is about, so I'm not going to explain the whole thing here. The famous numbers of the Bible, being mainly 3, 7, 12, 33, 40, 70, and 72 are understood by this progression.

W. Pope #fundie amazon.com

2016 The Final Revelation

There has always been proof of God. However, the Deity cannot be detected by physics, since He does not belong to the laws of physics. But He is proven by Truth. There are at present 9 proofs I can think of concerning the entity we call God. This is abbreviated:
1. elemental logic - we ourselves are proof of God, since nothing creates what it has not the power to create.
2. the nature of humans to conceive of eternal values.
3. the nature of humans to worship a god of some nature.
4. the nature of humans to develop a religion around the god.
5. the creation living creatures, showing design enginuity and amazing genius.
6. the nature of humans to wear clothing. Animals will not wear clothes, but humans always do, beginning at the fall of Adam.
7. the nature of humans to speak not only sounds, but words, and the words are formed in "primary sequence" or "equation" format. (subject, verb, indirect object, preposition, and direct object)
8. the nature of the universe
always to be initiated by choice. Physical things are generated, and form does not exist primarily even in abstract. It is only thought to be acted upon.
9. the nature of humans to either accept of reject the Gospel. Throughout history, people have recognized their sin, repented and believed the message of Christ. Why does this happen? If there is no sin, why have many people rejected evil for good.

There is a book that discusses these concepts entitled "2016 The Final Revelation." It is very enlightening.

M. Cat #fundie amazon.com

"Actually, the existance of God has been proven, by the lack of evidence that he does not exist. Science falls flat on it's face trying to disprove God. It's not guilty until proven innocent, it's innocent until proven guilty. Therefore the burden of proof MUST lie with the atheist."

leigh #fundie amazon.com

Ask a nurse about watching an unbeliever die, there are some horrific accounts of famous atheists screaming about the fire and burning, during the last hours of their lives. I don't believe this is a desirable way to die, even if there was no afterlife as you suppose. Doing the right thing and looking out for your neighbour is a lifestyle most people adapt anyway, so why is it such a stretch to worship God as Creator?

Pat Goltz #fundie amazon.com

[comment on book "A Charter On Negative Liberties"]

Morality is a concrete thing. It doesn't vary with the whims of a society. If we acknowledge that rights are granted by God (Declaration of Independence), then the same God has cast morality in stone. It is written on the heart of every human being. Furthermore, morality and worship are two entirely different things. God gave us free will, but He also gave us government to curb destructive behavior. See Romans 13.

A Muslim has a right to go to a mosque on Friday and worship there. He has no right to impose Shari'a law on the nation. Observe the distinction. Shari'a law is a moral system. It is not God's morality because of the egregious and unjust penalties it imposes. And it is not a form of worship. Our notion of liberty is founded in the Judeo-Christian consensus. Hindus see nothing wrong with taking a young girl to a temple and forcing her to become a prostitute. We know this is an egregious violation of that child's rights, and we do not permit that here. Morality is something very specific, and the mere fact that some people do not understand clearly what it is, or choose to ignore their own consciences doesn't mean that we don't have a duty to maintain the very fabric of society upon which our freedoms are based.

The organic law which the Founders left us is most CERTAINLY FULL of morality. The very idea of stating that rights come from the Creator is a moral statement. If we can ignore morality when it comes to harmful activity, then we undermine the very basis of our freedoms. I believe you have not thought through the implications of what you wrote, and I am challenging you to do so.

God dictates morality, not the federal government or any other government. When a government attempts to contravene God's moral law, that's dictating morality, even IF it appears it is granting freedom. Licentiousness enslaves on the most basic level. A licentious nation cannot maintain freedom.

James J #fundie amazon.com

It is sad to think that people object good things in life. Chick-Fil-A is standing and trying to keep people out of hell. Somehow people don't get it that when it is in their best interest they just reject it. So sad !

MarSch7 #fundie amazon.com

Look around you, Bubba. See the flowers, animals, skies, etc. Do you think they came out of boiling sludge? If that's the case, and the fittest survived. I wonder how that would work. Would a slimey fish crawl out the water, say I need legs, and just grow them? Or somehow mutate, and there they are, and that mutation is passed down? Tell me how they decided to develop into male and female - that must have been interesting - Who decided who gets the eggs? Who decided to have the babies grow inside them, and which ones to lay in eggs? Who decided that they eyeball placement would give us 3D vision and show the vision upside down inside our brains, but cause our brains to become able to decipher it?

THAT's what sounds so far out to me. How did something come from nothing? Who designed it? It's like saying drop a watch on an airfield and wait - it'll then evolve into an airplane over millions of years... "

J. Rigney #fundie amazon.com

1. Atheists know nothing about what they don't know, and they feel guilty enough to accuse those who know what atheists do not know. This only reveals a limited mind of not only atheists, but the atheistic scientists whose knowledge is limited to studying limited matter. Both seem to monopolize their own blogs with accusations and guilt mongering.
2. I suggest that believers in God give up meddling in the blogs of small mind atheists. There is just no room other than room enough for matter. The deceiver has put them here to waste our time to get on with the work of preparing for the completion of the Original Plan that God had in His mind before He created.
3. Atheists are, after all, and from the beginning, broods of the deceiver. Why bother with them? They are wasting God's time, which makes them very happy. That is their happiness in life.

R.K. Jones #fundie amazon.com

[review on the book, "Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters"]

Just more Lies and homosexual propaganda from someone trying to justify an immoral sexual practice. I guess bestiality and sex with minors will be the next abhorrent behaviors to be championed the next group of fascists waiting in the wings for their chance. You say you want everyone treated equally but you hate God, Christians and everything they stand for. The so called LGBTQ community is the most prejudiced, selfish, and radical group I have ever seen.

Chance #fundie amazon.com

Science is tainted by theories, most aren't even true. Carbon dating has been proved unreliable, and even some scientists today can date back humanity to a single woman (Eve). Evolution in my eyes is (indeed a theory FYI) misinterpreted genetics. So a dude went for a while to an island and saw genetics in action. Too many flaws in Evolution yet schools teach it anyway. ALL OF YOU LEARN YOUR CHRISTIAN ABC'S BEFORE TRYING TO ARGUE!

The 'God Sucks' Award

StevePL #fundie amazon.com

And another interesting point is that our seeking of gods is one of the biggest things that differentiates us from all the other creatures. I mean, is any atheist/scientists saying that a being with our intelligence HAS to wonder if there is a god? I mean, chimps are pretty smart, and it never occurs to them to wonder if there is a god, or an afterlife. It's almost like God created us with a God-sized hole, a God vacuum of sorts.

Superman #fundie amazon.com

Atheism cheapens everything it touches-look at the results of communism, the most powerful form of atheism on earth. Atheism is cheap on people, because it snobbishly says nine out of ten people through history have been wrong about God and have had a lie at the core of their hearts.

Superman #fundie amazon.com

Atheism is perfectly legal in America today. The problem with most Atheist is they only want to harass the honorable people of faith. As you know they therefore are just activist seeking attention that they didn't receive through a good faith based family structure. So, as I stated earlier an Atheist is just a loon for all intense and purpose in the eyes of the other 91% who do believe in religion.

Joe #fundie amazon.com

In three sentences why I became an atheist:

1) I've always wanted to be just like Madelyn O'Hare

2) I've always thought Stalin was misunderstood

3) The thought of abortion makes me happy

The Beast of Revelation #fundie amazon.com

Lao Tzu, no human is born an "atheist" in any meaningful sense of the word. When a human is born, he has not yet heard of God, so he has not yet asked himself whether God exists or not.

Therefore, no one is born either believing that God does not exist, or believing that he can not know whether God exists or not, or even simply believing that he should not yet decide.

Yes, "atheism" can mean "without belief in a god". But then you could call a rat an atheist, because a rat has never heard of God either. Both a newborn baby and a rat have never heard of God. But it is ridiculous to refer to either as an "atheist".

However, it is correct to refer to an atheist as a "rat". A rat can not be an "atheist", but an atheist can be a "rat".

The Beast of Revelation #fundie #pratt #homophobia amazon.com

In reality, the proof of God's existence is so abundant and obvious as to be undeniable by any rational person. The world in which we live clearly would not exist except for an omnipotent God.

The only reason why atheists believe that God does not exist is that they want to believe that. Their belief is not based on evidence that God does not exist, nor is it based on a lack of evidence that He does exist; their belief has no basis. It has only motivation. The atheist has psychological motivations for believing that God does not exist.

All of the reasons that atheists claim to have for their atheism are really just rationalizations. They had a desire to believe that God does not exist; when they finally found arguments that could allow them to deceive themselves into believing that he does not exist, they did so. The people became atheists after engaging in self-deception.

All of their arguments are really self-delusion.

Atheism is very common among homosexual men; this single fact proves that psychology, not evidence, is the cause of atheism. One can not rationally argue that homosexual men have more evidence that God does not exist. Thus, atheism must be the result of psychological motivation.

Of course, in addition to homosexuality, paranoia and fear of authority result in atheism.

God's existence is manifest and evident. The proof of God's existence is far too plentiful to be denied by any normal person. Therefore, only an individual who has an abnormal psychology can possibly be an atheist.

These are all established facts about psychology. No rational person ever disputes them.

Elias Vasquez #fundie amazon.com

2 billion deaths as a result of false beliefs in the history of the world before Jesus

2 and 1/2 million in 2000 years. on comparison to the rest of our recorded history.

Does that sound like a failure or ONE HELL OF A SUCCESS.

And he still promises more to come.

Most people like to take a view that supports their own interpretation without looking at the big picture.

Look at the big picture. Look at the world without Jesus and the number of Dead bodies. Then Look at the world with Jesus and count again. Belief in Jesus has been the biggest deterrent to religious killings in world history.

Alethea #fundie amazon.com

You do not prove that Christian Identity is a legit religion, like Islam. Because, it isn't. And neither should be Islam.

They break the law, by their basic tenet of denying others' free exercise of religion. Constitutional law, no less.

S. Kessler: "Islam is as much a Constitutionally protected religion as is Christianity and Judaism."

Islam is illegal here. Christianity and Judaism are not. Islam has been granted protection under the Constitution --- ILLEGALLY.

Mike A. Robinson #fundie amazon.com

[Note from the Mods: We are aware the original material has been removed at the source location. However, this quote was personally verified by us when it was still in PubAd, and at that time it had not been removed. Because of this, the quote stays. Please stop PMing the mods about it.]

Mathematics Requires Morality

The use of mathematics demands morality. Disclaim God and His moral law and there is no obligation to affirm that two plus two equal four, and that "A" cannot be "A" and "non-A" at the same time, in the same way. "Must" I affirm mathematical or logical truth? If so, I must provide objective unchanging moral grounds for the obligation, and that requires an unchanging God. For two plus three not to be four, anywhere at any time, requires a universal truth: which presupposes an all-knowing God (who supplies the moral law). God's law commands all men to tell the truth and forbids lying. This is the reason we "ought" to affirm two plus three equal five.

Presupposing God as the solution to all questions and the standard for truth does not mean that we must construct a theological postulate just to perform mundane tasks. Yet every simple task and every piece of routine communication presupposes the triune God because we use logic and morality in all those endeavors. God is the precondition for all logic and morality. If we presuppose anything other than God as our starting point, we end up with absurd and contradictory affirmations. The tri-unity of God--the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit--is inescapable if we want to make sense out of our world. To reject the triune God is to end up asserting your own philosophical demise. Deny God and you commit logical suicide.

Daniel J. Knight #fundie amazon.com

The author strangely, chooses to ignore the accuracy of the Bible and favors the secular record. It's nonsensical because the Bible repeatedly shows its accuracy in all manner of ways. Why would then, a person show favor to a limited secular record? Regardless, the author whether she likes it or not, shows how accurate the Bible is, because although she fudges against the Bible taking away or adding a few years here and there, it is only a few years. Now compare how consistant secular scientists' dates for the age of the universe is using different dating methods, and it will differ by millions or billions of years. Clearly the Bible is more reliable then. It's sad that Christine refuses to see that.

Sam Wood "Sam" #fundie amazon.com

[In a review of Victor Stenger's book "God: The Failed Hypothesis"]

Victor Stenger is a physicisist and therefore does not have the values and common-sense way of talking that me and my friends have - this angers me.

What makes me even angrier is that Victor seems to think that just by knowing "stuff" he can show that the gospels are wrong and there is no God. He should be more humble and admit that me and my friends are 100% right that God exists and that science cannot explain mysteries such as thought or how birds fly. Only through the eyes of faith can we really understand that Stenger doesn't know what he's talking about, because by believing in Jesus we strengthen our beliefs that we have the answers and Stenger and secular humanists should stop dissing us - this is a Christian country and they are guests.

Also, do not think that the false guess of evolution is true, because Charles Darwin thought of that while on opium and never practiced good science like Jesus and the apostles did. If evolution were true, Jesus would have told us about it, since he didn't Darwin was wrong and animals have always existsed the way they do now (except dinosaurs- people photoshopped pictures of them and fooled everyone and they never existed.)

reject stenger and all he surveys, for it is wicked.

FBRobertson "fbrobertson2 #fundie amazon.com

(From a review of "Kiss My Left Behind")

But because it is a mockery, because it throws insults toward Christians, then a book like this will be put on display. In this day and age the Christians have become the focus of Hate by the liberal media and groups like the ACLU. Further, Christians are the focus of hate by the secularists like Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins. While I write this small review, bigotry toward anyone who calls Jesus Christ their Lord and Savior is the must for such people as this Lee chap. Whether a Christian agrees with PreMill or not, no wonder books like the Left Behind are so popular, we Christians are the ones who are being discriminated against! People like Lee and the ones giving this a five star review show just how much America has slipped in terms of respect toward others. Christians are the ones that American elitists hate. That is, the Christians who acknowledge the Bible as truth and the Christians who live their lives for Christ. If this book had been a mockery of Hinduism, Islam, or some other religion like Wicca, the book would not have ever sold...not even considered...but because books like this show the growing and mounting hatred toward Christians, then yes, more books like this one will be seen all around. This is pure Christianphobia. This book is truly hateful just for the sake of being hateful. And that is why people are giving it a rave review, because they know that Christians are the target of hate crimes by organizations like the ACLU and people like Sam Harris, and such people that give this book rave reviews do so to get in on the action of hate crimes toward Christians.

Andraya G. Price #fundie #homophobia amazon.com

(From a lengthy review of a children's Book called "It's Not the Stork!")

On page 48 of the book, it describes the different types of families: "Some families have one child. Some families have two, or three, or four more children. Some families have a mommy and a daddy. Some have a mommy. Some have a daddy. Some have two mommies. Some have two daddies. Some kids live with a parent or stepparent, or with an aunt, an uncle, a grandmother, or grandfather, or with a foster parent. Some kids live with one parent part of the time and with their other parent the rest of the time."

That page is the books flaw, a big one no doubt. A family with 2 mommies or 2 daddies is not a family according to God's Word and the design of God Almighty. I absolutely am not going to be teaching my children what God refers to as an abomination! The book is so great otherwise, what we did was just take a black marker and cross out that one statement "Some have two mommies. Some have two Daddies." It is not biblical or the will of God to teach such a thing to a child as if it is okay, regardless of it is becoming more accepted in the mainstream world today. So I write this just to help Christ-Centered parents be aware.

No doubt sometimes family situations (like step-families etc) are a result of sin and not having Christ at the center of our lives at the time these things occured, but a step-family, single-mom family and so on, does NOT mean that Christ is not now there at the center of that family. I know step-families, single-mom families, divorced parents, and so on that live Christ-Centered lives and so I find no error the statement on page 48 with regards to the various types of families. These are not signs of ongoing sinful lifestyle.

However, a family that is made up of same-sex parents is not a picture of a biblical family period! There is no such thing as living in sin biblically! If a person is living a homosexual existence they are living an existence condemned and seperated from God. A "family that has two mommies or two daddies", though some may consider it to be a "family", the bible does not consider or teach it to be so, and so parents that are trying to use this book as a tool to teach their children about the "healthy sexuality" and such, will want to beware of this page.

Children need not be taught that an sinful choice such as a same sex relationship, is a healthy form of a family just as God's design for a family which is ONLY one Mommy and one daddy. In no way does that mean homesexuality is worse than any other sin. BUT a "family" with homosexual parents is a one illustrates a lifestyle of ongoing sin, it is sin and it does separate us from God and a homosexual lifestyle can not be the way of life of a follower of Christ, and Christ-Centered parenting teaches that homosexuality is an abomination ... NOT that it's a hunky-dory family.

Cindy Marie #fundie amazon.com

Athiests say there is no god. So why weren't the atheists in Haiti helping that country's poor before this earthquake? they knew the people there were poor. And they know there is no god to help them. So why did the atheists allow those people to live in poverty when they could have helped them? If there is no god, then you can't blame him. If there is no god then why do atheist blame god for this and ask why he didn't help? I ask the atheists. Why didn't you help those poor people so they didn't have to live in poverty. Don't hide behind god. there is none. Don't hide behind christians as they are demented and believe in gods and fairies. Why didn't the athiests have this poor country on their list of things to fix. Do the atheists blame God so as to misplace the blame that is really their own. There is no God. there is only man. Man could have fixed the problem and man did not. Humans suck, don't they? If there is no god we have only ourselves to blame. So quit blaming the God you do say does not exist. Blame yourselfs atheists.

Ringaround #fundie amazon.com

I'm quite charmed at the way old man Dawkins rants and raves and gets all tangential at the drop of the hat. Funny guy. As a dinner guest, he would undoubtedly make for an entertaining evening. His arguments for evolution, on the other hand, don't hold up too well in light of today's scientific data. He conveniently avoids Intelligent Design, which is a shame. That was a gaping hole that I would have loved to see filled. Also, recent scientific evidence has proven that all mankind has one common ancestor, the New Eve they call her. She is a 60,000-year-old female. Why is that too avoided here? I'm sure Ricky knows all about her. To boot, show me the medium-necked giraffe. It should be there somewhere in the fossil record. Why isn't it? Well, I think we all know why. Because evolution, the jumping from one species to another (as opposed to adaptation, penguins and ostriches for example) is merely bad science.

J. Day #fundie amazon.com

[A review of They Might Be Giants' new children's album 'Here Comes Science']

I bought this CD+DVD for my son since he really loves the first several TMBGs kids albums No, ABCs and 123s. I own just about every TMBG album out there... I even bought Why does the Sun Shine when it was a new release... So I was very surprised to find out that this CD which claims "Science is Real" and even has a song "Put it To the Test" about the Scientific method has one very religious song and two with lots of religious undertones.

I can think of thousands of things you could make songs about with Science without dedicating three songs to fairy tales about Monkeys. How about volcanoes? Lightning? Why Is the Sky Blue? At least they thru in the song "Davey Crocket in Outer Space" to show everything on their DVD is not, in fact, "Real". Davey Crocket has more to do with being "Real" than track 6[*] which is all about TMBGs world view and their belief and faith in a bizarre and crazy theory that never has been observed, and can not be put to the test.

Anyway, beware if you buy this that TMBG will try to indoctrinate your children with wacko religious views, which they will get plenty of in high school and college. Better to steer clear of this one, and maybe pick up a CD about Peter and the Wolf... it is considerably more about real science than "Here comes Science".


[* Track 6 is a song titled 'My Brother The Ape']

Next page