RE: Richard Dawkins asks whats the difference between transgender and transracial (and kicks open a hornets nest!)
This reply: "I cannot believe you are normalizing this debate. Dolezal had all the access to white privilege and then occupied space that wasn’t hers to occupy. You’re wrong on this one."
Some TRA's are so close to getting it that it's painful. Swap white for male, and then you've got it.
I cant believe this poster was not being sarcastic and was dead serious. Again, what's the difference? I dont see a single difference at all and this poster somehow managed to summarize exactly why...and is still clueless. Someone in another thread asked if TRA are really as stupid as they come across. I'm convinced they really are.
To the left, maleness cancels whiteness, but femaleness doesn't. That's why we get points deducted for being white, while white men can continue to debate trans rights and women's rights without criticism.
They know racism is real but don't acknowledge sexism as real.
Its not that they don't think sexism is real, it's that they want to be the victim of it. There's something about needing victim status or oppression points that the trans community really seems driven by.
For some strange, unknowable reason, I'm not seeing any TRAs tell Dawkins to choke on their girl dick
It’s almost as if TRAs can tell what sex he is.