[Replying to the remark that we as a human species are not weak, but robust as shown by our scientific advances]

Scientific advances? Like polluting the environment and inventing cancer!?

Most politicians and religious leaders are members of secret societies. Masonry and the Vatican control the power of the world. These societies and the Vatican practice satanism. They have created international terrorism with the purpose of creating the third World War. They want to make it appear that all conflicts have been caused by conflicts and divisions between world countries and religions to establish a one world government and religion ruled by a leader who will claim to be the prophesied Messiah and to rule by divine authority. They will quote Bible verses to deceive people into thinking this is the Kingdom of God, and they will make all kind of signs and wonders. The UFO phenomenon and New Age Movement have been created for this purpose. This is the kingdom of the beast prophesied in the Bible in which all nations will gather. All people will worship the beast and all true followers of Yeshua will be persecuted. The aliens are fallen angels and hybrids, the gods worshipped by the ancient civilizations. Of course they will present great benefits to the population and they will relase new technologies and promises of peace and prosperity but do not believe them, they are only lying. This will be a fascist government, where all the people will be implanted with mind control chips and the useless eaters put to death. They have planted many lies to keep us away from the truth. God is not of any religion or denomination, because all are controlled and have substituted God because they claim to be the Truth, the Way and the Life. God is in our heart and teaches us individually, we must only understand and do what He commands. The Only Way is Yahshua the Messiah. What the majority believes is always the lie. Where the carcass is (false Christ), the vultures will gather (multitudes). <<<a href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/" target="_blank">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/</a>>> <<<a href="http://www.sherryshriner.com/" target="_blank">http://www.sherryshriner.com/</a>>> <<<a href="http://www.mt.net/~watcher/" target="_blank">http://www.mt.net/~watcher/</a>>>

I was an atheist most of my life, since the age of about 12. After ditching the tooth fairy, easter bunny and santa claus, God was next in line. This was my liberation. I was of the opinion that there was no God, and that all rational people should draw the same conclusion. The only thing that could possibly budge me from my position was EVIDENCE.

Well, in September 2004, I got the evidence. Absolute proof in fact. I got it shortly after I wrote message 666 on the 3rd anniversary of 9/11. Message 666 was the culmination of my 37 years of searching for the words to describe my ideology/religion (as an atheist I was STRONGLY supporting freedom and human rights). You can read about message 666 here (I've posted it before):

<a href="http://antisubjugator.blogspot.com/2005/07/sign-of-beast.html" target="_blank">http://antisubjugator.blogspot.com/2005/07/sign-of-beast.html</a>

However, as you have probably guessed already, the proof that I was given was not independently scientifically verifiable. Which means you have no option other than to dismiss it. Or at most, you can only accept it as a theory. So anyway, here is the "theory":

We are living in a computer simulation, and God is the computer programmer. This model does not require supernatural powers. All it requires is for us to have computer technology more advanced than we have at the moment - Artificial Intelligence for starters. In a 15 billion year history, don't you think it is quite improbable that we happened to be born just when computers, nukes and the internet were invented? And also just when the USSR collapsed opening the way for worldwide freedom. And on a millenium year as well. A mere 1 million years either way would have drastically altered the simulation. Hell, even 1000 years either way would have drastically changed things.

I believe the universe is only a few decades old. God didn't sit around twiddling his thumbs for 15 billion years waiting for us to evolve. The whole thing is simulated. The whole universe is just a "virtual reality". We're probably really on a space ship, and this simulation is being run for entertainment purposes (can you think of anything better than a virtual reality to keep yourself entertained?).

And the reason God doesn't want to prove his existence is so that people will become atheists and be totally free. This is what he wants. He doesn't want to tell people how to live their lives, he wants us to make up our own rules. The only way we can be totally free is if we believe there is no God, or at least, that there's no God who's going to sit in judgement. In actual fact, we are all NATURAL ANIMALS. None of us are sinners. We all act in accordance with our genes, reacting to our environment, and using our imperfect logic skills. None of these things are our fault.

Anyway, my point is that there is definitely an intelligent entity in another dimension to us. So if you're a hard-core atheist, think again, because you're actually wrong (even though I can't scientifically prove that to your satisfaction). You need to update your model and allow for the possibility of a God, and convert to agnosticism instead. BTW, a computer simulation gives a logical reason why we can't reproduce life from raw ingredients - the properties are defined in software, which we don't have access to.

The reality is that not only can't scientists prove things 'absolutely,' they can't prove anything period. The selection of one theory as an explanation over another is purely arbitrary.

No you may not be heartless and cruel but you are heartless and callous in your belief that developing homo sapiens 'have no brain.'

It won't do any good to quibble about how 'successful' naturalisitc science has been. This can only be attributed to pure chance.

How come there is not affirmative action for Asian people? Because Asians have a high mental capacity and have no need for a governmental handicap. For some reason, blacks do.

Sperm and eggs are not humans... They are parts of a human, but they are not humans. Fetuses are parts of a human, AND individual humans. <u>Not all living humans have brains</u>, and not all living humans have legs. Neither criteria should legally exclude them from the right to life. [Emphasis added]

What's to say 'God' can do whatever he wants, considering he's able to do everything that is not against his nature? (so no 'can god make a toilet that he couldn't flush himself down it?' type of questions). Tell me some scientific discoveries as a direct result of atheism. Evolution? Woo. How practical.

I can only conclude that some people literally want to see as many pregnancies as possible aborted and suffer a sense of personal defeat every time a potential abortion client Chooses Life.

I see no reason why anyone should become angry about these things. I am not here to become angry at atheists, nor am I here to make atheists angry at me. But when I get an opportunity to press someone's buttons, I will do so.

If i become a doctor it will be to heal humans. If i wanted to heal primates i would have been a veterinarian.

If the government was allowed to print objective, truthful statements about homosexuality, the populace would be against it. The American people are sick of the gay agenda anyway, but the powers that be has honest Americans too busy with work to pay taxes to object to the agenda. If you are too busyn slaving, you cannot complain.

If you can accuse me of wanting to force women to carry their babies to term, then I can accuse you women who have abortions of having forced their men to have had sex with them. That’s no less logical. Just more absurd.

Addressed to all Angry, Obscene & Offensive Atheists: I am David Mathews and have come here to provoke you to reveal your anger, your bitterness, your hate, your bigotry, your prejudice and every other flaw of your dismal and hopeless soul. The more obscene and offensive you are the better. Don't restrain yourself. Let go of your inhibitions!

If I was President of the USA... Social Security would be outlawed. The public school system would be thing of history. If you have 8 children, you pay for 8 children to go to school... Nasa would die. If you want to put a salllelite into space, your company will pay for it. The post office will die... cocaine, heroin and ecstacy would be decriminalized... The orpahnages will be for profit, which will maximaze placement to good quality families... The death penalty will be given to those who commit the following crimes... Rape... Armed robbery... Homosexuality with anyone under 16.

Evolution has really nothing to do with genetics, unless you call variation among species evolution.

If you spent a little time listening to yourself you might realize that you come across as a very angry, sad, bitter person. Of course, I might be mistaken. Perhaps in real life you are a positive, delightful atheist.

What about the miracles produced in the historical books of the New Testament? The Earliest Book was A.D. 37 (Mark) [actually, <a href="http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/mark.html" target="_top">circa 70 AD</a>]. Not nearly enough time to fabricate them.

I should derive amusement from angry people, offensive people, obscene people and for all others who go out of their way to display hate for their fellow humans for any reason whatsoever. I am amused by how their behavior reveals their character.

Hello Atheists, I am inclined to tolerate you people and must say that atheism is not inherently offensive to me.

Well, in California, if a woman doesn't put her seat belt on her body, cops have the right to give her a $60 ticket. Isn't that a 'way whatsoever' that someone else has a right over a woman's body?

Similar anatomy and DNA doesn't mean we are primates, sorry. And if humans are primates, why do they get such better care and respect than animals?

Atheists are funny when they become offensive. No doubt about it. Atheists are a whole lot more entertaining when they are emotional, obscene and irrational.

How many of subscribe to the idea that the steep decline in violent crime rates in the early 1990's is attributable to the aborting of many of the crime prone un the early to mid 1970's??? Don't be shy raise your hands.

[Replying to 'Coma patients have brain activity']So do the brain dead. But, unlike you, I don’t ask you to take my word for it.

Have you ever wondered why you are so angry? I could tell you ...

[Replying to 'Early embryos have no brain...they are basically a parasite']The Lord Almighty, referring to LadyShea's soul when it floats up out of this world's septic tank for His inspection:  Methinks the lady has no charity... she has basically been a parasite breathing the air plants produced and eating food Mexican day-laborers harvested except when she held her breath during the Bork supreme court nomination process.

We become honest and tell homosexuals that they are sick and in need of psychological health. I think that the majority of Americans are sick ands tired of having the homosexual agenda rammed downed our collective throat.

How do you dress up an idea that makes no sense, get it accepted as science, and even as a scientific fact? Well it isn't easy. You'll have to stretch the truth in several different ways. First, and most obviously, you have to direct attention away from the fact that your idea is nothing more than handwaving...

That seams improper to me, the more proper term would just be bang since they chose to stay with a term based on exageration i have just reason to remain skepitcal and that there are other motivations at work here. Don't be a sucker dude, there fooling you they don't want your pie to go to the chuch they wan't it to go to them. Find out the real reason why the theroy is still call the big bang...

then we have the problem of transition species in the fossil record, to be facetious we can't find pigs that fly. we can't find fossils of intermediate stages of mutation or morphology, no cat-dogs, bird-rats, cows with feathers, etc.

This is just the disrespect i'm talking about, a women butts in on a post i made to other men acting agressively at my post (acting like a man trying to assert authority over my opinion)...

Part of it [the author's purpose] is to suspend our disbelief, if they succed they have effectively deceived and lied to us.

It [circumcision] is moral if the parents wish it done, for anyone to take away a parents rights to bring up there children how they see fit is immoral.

I would never say something like that because I don't want Jews to find me offensive. I don't care if liberals find me offensive or not. I find them offensive.

I'm sorry, but you're confusing mythology for science, but what's new? Next, you'll have to narrow the scope of your theory. Defending the absurd is hard enough as it is...

If I valued conformity, keeping in mind that I live in America, then I wouldn't be a Muslim. I am as non-conformist as they come. If you are a liberal, then you are a conformist.

Someone has to be the head of the family man was created that king because man is stronger than woman i didn't make the world like this, that is how it is, try and respect you position in the world.... Now we have women acting like there the kings of the throne (as demonstarted above)...

Ahh, but who are we fooling?... You're not creating anything new. But bird's beak changes shape and size... Same bird. But since allele frequencies do change, therefore the giraffe came from the fish?

You will never see me there [on FStDT!] and I do not believe in luck and if you don't cultivate a sense of humor early your posts will look like yours above

So when I pick up a book or watch a movie, where I am not in control, and the story unfolds as the writer wills it, against my will and what I want from the story, I am actually being violated?

I was wondering if Atheists are attatched to their dead. If an Aunt dies, does an atheist mourn?

I have no complaints against staff here or the administration in general but I am asking for an airing of complaints that may be aired against me in the future.

Right, now as an atheist, you just have to accept that humanity is a destructive plague on the Earth!

[Replying to 'So a father has a right to rape his daughters?']I do not condone those actions, what he does within his castle has nothing to do with me. if i chose to interfere then i am disrespecting that family's rights the same as the father is disrespecting his daughters rights... Two wrongs don't make a right... You can't condone abuseing family rights and condem the father for abuseing his dauthers rights your doing the same thing as him... Its called disrespect and i find to be quite sad just how many people don't respect other peoples rights.

If Jesus chose it, then it can't be torture, Jesus is more like a s/m kinda guy. God said, if you wanna do some good for humanity, these are the terms. You don't have to, but if you really want to do some good... God didn't make him do it.

[In reply to 'laws again parents beating their children are immoral?!']In my opinion yes if you cant respect a familys rights how are you any different than that family not respecting there childs rights.

1.A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood. Lightsabers, hyperdrives. 2.Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression. It is a wrong impression to give to someone, saying that Darth Vader exist, even in a story. It falls under the category of a lie does it not?

Isn't telling a fictional story, something which isn't real, per definition a lie?