Just don't send him to US Blackbird! No way would I EVER EVER EVER tolerate a homosexual minister! I'd leave that church so fast!

Under these circumstances, the man would have fully repented of homosexuality and would wholly reject the label 'abstinate homosexual' but rather 'former homosexual'. In short, anyone who considered themselves a 'homosexual', abstinate or active, would not be fully repentant and therefore not qualifed to minister.

So for me, the jury is out on Jack Chick. At best, he is a guy who has done much to expose the ultimate evil in our world (the Vatican and the forces of Satan in our government).

One cannot simultaneously be truly repentant and label themselves by a predisposition towards a particular sin. Contrary to popular indoctrination, 'homosexual' is defined by what some perverse people do, not by what they are.

Well the sources you provide [rebutting the errors in Chick tracts] appear to be Catholic... I'm considering the source there. I know without a doubt that Jack Chick and Dr. Rivera were telling the truth.

But would they [even] be a homosexual if they were celibate. Aren't YOU implying that you can tell a homosexual person by how they look or act?

I have found with the evolutionary side is that they have an excuse for everything. There is NOTHING which they cannot accomodate one way or another. That makes any evidence presented by creation folk irrelevant, ignorant, too limited to count, etc.

So just because some schlub who threw together a web site says Chick's not honest, I should just jump on *their* bandwagon? Anyway, I did my research on it a long time ago and I can say with confidence that Chick is not dishonest.

I really can't blame you. It is an affect of sin that is the reason you can't understand the scriptures, that is until the day God finally reveals their truths to you.

[Replying to 'would you object to a celibate homosexual minister?']Absolutely I would! He would get a one way Greyhound bus ticket to the middle of nowhere!

Maybe I'm an exception; however, this earth doesn't look ancient to me... Oh yes, perhaps 10 thousand years old or so but billions of years seems totally idiotic.

They [Mormons] claim some ancient civilizations here on the American continents. There is not only no evidence for that claim, there is evidence against it! ... But they will not admit to either weakness, because they 'know' L[atter]D[ay]S[aint] theology is true! Why do they know it is true? Because they were taught it is true -- or because any alternative was handled so poorly by others that Mormonism becomes a default theology. Nevertheless, it is a lie.

Evolution is merely a myth for adults who reject the Gospel. It is doomed from the start.

History will prove the JBS [John Birch Society] was correct, after all. There is a global effort for a one world government.

All gays recruit. And this is what is going on! You are not born gay...you are recruited.

Sherrie is right, gay people do recruit. When I was 18 I had a roommate that tried to recruit me. She got me very confused. God did help me thru it and would not let me stray.

You see, life isn't just chemicals. If it were, you could take a recently dead organism and get it to live again, simply by jump-starting the molecules somehow. But that doesn't work, does it? Instead, we know that life is something apart from the chemicals; something somehow imposed on them which uses them but is not them.

What would happen if people actually found the Ark? Massive tourism; shrines; it would become Super-Relic and wood from the Ark would be faked and sold all over the world. Those who did not want to believe it real would continue to refuse -- after all, they already refuse in the face of other evidence of the actual reality of Genesis!

One of the reasons I was impressed with creationist writing and speaking at the beginning was not just their use of data, but the attitude with which it was presented. Instead of hearing, or reading, “this is the way it was” as though it were already known for sure, I was hearing an invitation to think and reason for myself, which was quite refreshing.

evolution is based purely on the imaginations and fantasies of scoffers of the Bible. There's no science involved.

The Paluxy river in Glen Rose, Texas... was found to have millions of dinosaur and human footprints side by side! Now if them years were millions of years old why are there human footprints beside dino ones??

I don't know what you are suggesting, but you are sadly mistaken if you think I have any sympathy for an atheist maggot who spent most of his life trying to legitimatize a Satanic ideology. He's a Christian now, but a little too late.

The demons in hell are dancing with glee! The enemy is rejoicing....another blow to Judeo-Christian heritage in the USA! What's next, an atheist stamp?

[Commenting on Stephen Jay Gould's death]I'll bet that atheist is wishing he had not led so many people astray! I am sure that leeches like him get an "extra special" treatment in Hell. He asked for it, and he deserves it!

I think this issuing of a Muslim stamp on George Washington's Birthday is a deliberate slap in the face by the USPS to traditional American Judeo-Christian beliefs...... This is another selling out of America in the name of political correctness. It is a slap in the face of the 09/11 Islamic jihad victims, as well. And contrary to what was posted above, I do believe God is interested in the affairs of even mundane things such as postage stamps. God is going to JUDGE the NATIONS someday as well as individual people. If He cares about a sparrow that falls, He cares about stamps!

Muslim postage stamps?!?! PLEASE, make sure you write the USPS and tell them "NO WAY" to this nonsense...This is America! - not islam...

Supporting Islam runs contrary to the spirit of this nations founding Fathers...that of not kissing up to anyone, not being afraid to take politcal risks and tell something like it is. I guess if you boil it down, as a Christian I don't really care for most of the pettiness this world, society, and government has to offer, especially stupid, false religions like Islam.

I am the principal of a Christian School. A child in our second grade asked her teacher about "Santa". The teacher told her that "Santa" was a fairy tale not to be confused with Jesus who was not. The next day the parents were in contact with me about disallusioning their child. What was especially enlightening was when the parent expressed alarm when the child asked her "What else have you lied to me about?

I use to live in the Milwaukee area a few years back, and witnessed homo-sexuals walking and other things in public, and on the streets in broad daylight. A deplorable sight and very embarrassing for my children to witness such abominations.

The only thing that proves is there are many Biblical teachings about Jesus that satan has mimicked via "santa claus". 1)His white hair like wool. 2)Has a beard. 3)Comes in red apparel. 4)Hour of his coming is a mystery. 5)Is a carpenter. 6)Comes as a thief in the night. 7)Omnipotent, Omniscient, Omnipresent 8)Ageless, eternal 9)Giver of gifts. 10)Sits on a throne. 11)Wants little children to come to him. 12)Judges ...and there is so much more! Satan/santa is leading adults and children away from Jesus. Ask any child what christmas is really about.

I formed a group on yahoo for stuff like this called "The American League of Porn Fighters"

<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ALPF/">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ALPF/</a>

If we can get enough like-minded people in there we can do more than just talk about this kind of stuff

Please Join!

It doesn't have to be nudity to be pornography. It is the thoughts that the images provoke that make it sinful, thus porn.

Which do you take more seriously, the Bible, or "science" ? If you question the creation, do you also question the Garden of Eden, the Flood, the Tower of Babel ? Do you believe Balaam's ass spoke, with a man's voice ? Do you believe the "Fourth man in the Fire" story in Daniel ?

If you are a Christian that agrees with evolution, then God is waiting for you to repent of your sin.

Even the originators of the "theory/hypothesis" of evolution come to a point where they must admit that their belief in evolution is simply because they do not want to bow down before the great Creator of the universe and own Him as their Master. That would be an admission of subservience and a logical outcome would be if Christ/God is my master, then I must obey His commandments--which the natural or unsaved man is unwilling to do. Thus the theory of evolution was devised as an alternative to belief in God Almighty.

What is the general consensus on the Sear catalog? With all those bras and bikinis, my mom used to call it "The poor man's playboy".

How can a Christian believe that we came from apes is ridiculous! They are not Christian!

I guess if you have no problem with playing around with eastern religions [by getting acupuncture treatments], then go ahead.

This is common in Hebrew poetry. Job is the same way. The morning stars and the angels are not the same thing.

Finally, did the morning stars sing? There is evidence of sound coming from stars themselves. If it is or was harmonic, and variable, the first day of creation, what word would better describe it than singing?

Yes, animals were not carnivorous before Adam and Eve sinned (Gen. 1:30). As for Dr. Hovind, I am not saying that I agree with him all the time, but hey, there is $250,000 for the taking with proof of evolution! Besides, if we want to call people extremists and such, well, I would have to say that those comprising the clear teaching of Scripture with absolutely no good reason rather extreme.

They can believe in evolution and still be a Christian, but that goes to show that they are: 1) In need of taking the Scriptures more seriously; and 2) In need of taking science more seriously (especially the laws of thermodynamics). Evolution is a philosophy and it is a religion, it is far from being a science. After all, it is the "theory" of evolution.

It sounds like the Russian schools are becoming parochial schools of the Russian Orthodox Church which is very anti Protestant as well as anti Roman Catholic. The kids will probably be indoctrinated with Eastern Orthodox theology.

Book of Mormon is not Christian
Book of Mormon is Mormonism (or Preisthood, Holy Ghost..),
Jesus continue called another prophets (man),
Priesthood, Holy Ghost, Baptism, family,
choice evil or good, test wicked, punched..etc..

I think Book of Mormon is almost destroy this book from Satan
and loss 116 pages (that a lot pages),
maybe Joseph Smith is guilt because if he rewrite on Book of Mormon
before loss 116 pages.

sad

Bible is God create, 40 prophets from God called, Jesus walk,..God end.

Some *crying* is sinful. It all depends upon what the infant is crying about. It is much like my anger. Sometimes the things I get angry over are sinful. Helen had previously brought up the point that anger "without cause" is the only time anger is sin. I might disect this a little further, anger that does not have Gods intention and desires foundating it, is sin.

In the same way, we don't know what babies can do that is sin, but they must do some sin, otherwise they wouldn't be able to die.

[On the types of sins done by infants]

For example: the baby has been fed, burped, clean diaper, loved, etc. Now you lay the baby to bed knowing full well that all needs have been met and the baby cries. At the time the baby cries it is leading you to believe that there is something wrong and if you pick up the baby and it stops crying then the baby through its' cry has lied and will continue this tactic as long as it works. The baby's only possible motive is SELF GRATIFICATION.

A baby *fussing* and getting angry becuase he is hungry, is sin!

What rational reason do you have for a basis of your belief. The Bible is full of prophecies; that is true. Not one of them has ever failed. There is no contradiction in the Bible."

"Yes Satan does have his children still on earth. All who do not know Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour are children of the devil.

Well Helen, I guess you can come to the conclusion that Yes, sad but true,they [infants] can [sin]........as soon as they are born,you hear anger in their cries.....and some are angry their whole life!!!!!.

You have never met a baby that cries?

Crying equates displeasure, i.e. pain, hunger, discomfort, etc.

Displeasure must be comprised within the guidelines of, "witout cause or Godly intentions...selfless" or is it sin.