I would like to debate moralfags.
Seriously, the lawcucklodry is getting out of hand.
Give me specific, logical reasons as to why:
1) grown men being sexual with teenage women is a bad thing
2) redistribution of the vagina (as a form of capital) is a bad thing
3) revenge and retaliation against normans is a bad thing
4) the rape of promiscuous women is a bad thing
5) the practice of white shariah law is a bad thing
10 comments
Sapient human beings, there`s one. You`re gonna die in a ditch, shot by the cops and/or a heroic citizen, that`s two.
1. Because grown men wanting to bang teen girls usually do so because teen girls won't know how shit they are both in bed and in life because they lack the experience. Teen girls are more easily abused than adult women.
2. Vaginas are attached to people and people are not capital. Women are not here for you to use and dump at will.
3. Normans never did anything to you. The fact you can't get laid is your fault, not theirs.
4. So you would be happy to have your favourite food forced down your throat at length?
5. I'd really like to see this guy say this in front of the Daily Heil.
1,2,3,4,5: all of them are wrong because they are harmful to other people. I don't really think you have "phenomenal skills" at either debate or interpersonal relations, and I don't see either of those improving in the near future.
Admittedly, the objections to your 'why' list are all mostly based on a premise that women are people, too.
Therefore, women deserve better treatment than as a mere vagina support and transport system.
People who recognize women's rights as people ('normans' to you) do not deserve to face your 'retaliation' for not indulging your misogyny.
And that's mostly what you want 'white shariah' (shariah law is a TEENSY bit redundant) for, to indulge your fears as if you had some moral basis for them.
So the logical rebuttal for the list would be, fuck off you whiny little misfit. Society has tried very hard to move on beyond your fantasy views of sex slaves.
1. teenagers aren't legal adults and furthermore and likely uneducated on the subject of sex and thus will not be making an informed choice, nullifying consent on two counts
2. because women aren't property, nor are any part of them
3. because petty vengeance attacks and murder has been illegal since Saxon times
4. percieved promiscuity is not consent
5. sticking "white" onto a law system that's medieval as fuck does not make it ok
well that was easy.
1) grown men being sexual with teenage women is a bad thing
Because teenage girls are not emotionally mature enough to handle a sexual relationship with an adult, nor are they physically or emotionally mature enough to handle having a baby.
2) redistribution of the vagina (as a form of capital) is a bad thing
Because, whether you like it or not, women are human beings too and have all the rights as such. They are not sexual playthings to be traded.
3) revenge and retaliation against normans is a bad thing
Because nobody ever did anything to you. It's all made up in your idiot minds. The fact that people are going about living their lives and don't even know you exist is not any sort of slight against you. It wouldn't be revenge or retaliation, it would be a baseless attack.
4) the rape of promiscuous women is a bad thing
It doesn't matter how many sex partners a woman has had, if she doesn't want to have sex with someone she shouldn't be forced to. Again, women are people, not sex toys.
5) the practice of white shariah law is a bad thing
First Amendment, bitch. For that matter, the rest of the Constitution, too.
1)Don't most of you morons think 14 as the "prime age", so of course you'd approve of that sick behavior.
2)Is that your entitlement complex at work again.
3) Try that and you'll be on a watchlist, or even in jail
4) Rape IS bad, it doesn't matter who it is or how many partners one's slept with
5) ??????
"2) redistribution of the vagina (as a form of capital) is a bad thing"
I suppose you think you'd be earning virgin vaginas at your minimum wage job in a vagina-based economy?
Dude, you'd still be complaining that Chad's Father is giving him the prime virgins.
The normies would be dealing in second- and third-hand capital, hoping to retire to a nice MILF in the country some day.
Incels would still be at the bottom of the market, saving up their pubic-hairs to buy interest in what they refer to as a 'used up roastie' when she makes it down that far on the ladder.
Trickle-down economics would have a much more graphic trickle.
1- Just ask Doug 'Piranha' Jones about he not doing so
2- The anime series "Chobits" is not a documentary
3- In Soviet Battle of Hastings, Normans retaliate against you [/1066, And All That]
4- Better pray that you're not put in the same cell as Bubba
5- Timmy Robbingscum. Your call
6- ?????
7- PROFIT!
But not for you manbabies. Good.
Debate over.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.