It is not. But it is extremely bad if you lack any experience with women whatsoever and think you can give advice to men. It's like an obese man diet's book and these guys are Jabba the Hut promoting his diet book. Everything they promote hasn't worked for them and won't work for any man. They just can't stand the idea only brutally raping and beating up a woman will bring success. Ironically, they have no problem with non-whites doing this.
>Or to respect consent?
Again, it isn't bad unless you're dealing with human scum that will see it as weakness. And today's women in the West will see it as weakness and you as pathetic. Good, patriarchal women would respect it but they no longer exist.
12 comments
Please provide proof of the drivel you spew forth, Cammy-Poo.
Edit: You know Marjie, it might blow your fragile little, and I do mean little, mind to learn that a lot of the men on FSTDT have girlfriends and wives.
....It's like an obese man diet's book and these guys are Jabba the Hut promoting his diet book....
So, of course, people like me who are capable of interacting with women without getting slapped (either physically or with a restraining order), and do so frequently without any demands for sex for arbitrary reasons, are "like Jabba the Hutt promoting a diet book" when we try to give advice about dealing with women. But a literal motherfucker who hasn't even set foot outside the asylum in a couple years, whose only interactions with women have been hallucinations and figments of its imagination which vaguely resemble women physically but act nothing like actual human beings to confirm its bias, that's totally the type to get advice from, because it pretends it had sex one time.
EDIT: @Bimaac
it might blow your fragile little, and I do mean little, mind to learn that a lot of the men on FSTDT have girlfriends and wives.
Yeah, but most of the primary targets of its obsession don't, which means that said vast majority of people who do are somehow the exception.
>Yeah, but most of the primary targets of its obsession don't, which means that said vast majority of people who do are somehow the exception.
And it probably thinks that we're "beta orbiters" whose girlfriends and wives are "cucking" us at every chance they get with "incels'" "Chad" boogeyman.
And it probably thinks that we're "beta orbiters" whose girlfriends and wives are "cucking" us at every chance they get with "incels'" "Chad" boogeyman.
I dunno, that was never really the motherfucker's thing. It's all about expressing hatred towards any woman who dares exist and any man who dares disagree with it on anything. Its focus is more on women being too stupid to make intelligent decisions (translation: smart enough to realize it's a psychopath that can only hate). The cultists it apparently inspired are the ones who are more about the love-hate with "Chad" and whining about how all the women are being stolen away by said "Chads" (read: fucking anyone, seriously, they called one of their own a "Chad" simply for getting laid I cannot stress this enough).
>The cultists it apparently inspired are the ones who are more about the love-hate with "Chad" and whining about how all the women are being stolen away by said "Chads" (read: fucking anyone, seriously, they called one of their own a "Chad" simply for getting laid I cannot stress this enough).
Can't forget the other strawman/boogeyman they have a love/hate relationship with; "Stacy".
It's like I keep saying; "Chad" is a boogeyman and a figment of their imagination and kids should stop believing in boogeymen when they start going to school for a full day.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
