I am "an angry young man," eh?
Do not judge my character based on so little. I am angry, yes. But there is a difference between being angry and being an angry person, you see. I am passionately outraged at you, for being such a reprehensible hypocrite and trying to pass yourself off as having the moral high ground, despite your evil racism.
"Your morality comes from humanist nonsense."
So, you label me as a humanist, huh? Okay, I'll bite. I may not identify as one, but if you think that believing in equality, dignity, rights and justice for all mankind is "nonsense," that says way more bout you than it does about me.
"You point to a pile of guillotined heads and call it moral highground."
Where the hell are you getting this ridiculously dramatic rhetoric from? Your grandstanding is the real nonsense here. I can't even imagine what you figuratively refer to as "pointing to a pile of guillotined heads." When did I do such a thing?
"You are the one with blood on your hands from the French Revolution through the Bolshevik revolution."
I beg your pardon? Racism causes real human suffering and evil in the world, even passive-aggressively. So I am perfectly justified in calling you evil for proudly espousing such evil, hateful bigotry. But where do you get off blaming me for the actions of revolutionaries and Marxists? You don't know my politics. I am relatively liberal, compared to you, but my political positions are in no way related to- or responsible for- such radicalism, not even indirectly.
"You have Robespierre and Lenin.
I have George Washington and Jefferson Davis."
Again with the nonsense rhetoric. I do not "have" Robespierre and Lenin any more than you "have" George Washington or Jefferson Davis. Stop trying to spinelessly use long-dead politicians to fight your inane proxy war, and ACTUALLY DEBATE ME. I can go all day debunking your racist nonsense, if only you would engage me directly instead of throwing out pointless distractions and retarded, nonsensical analogies.