Denise #racist

Denise #racist occidentaldissent.com

Afterthought – schizophrenia is transnitted via virus. Jews are the carriers. Look it up.

A Mulatto “shrink” is on Fox ‘n Friendz this AM. He’s non-stop yammering about “meds meds meds”. This massacre [at the Sandy Hook Elementary School] will not be the catalyst for gun seizures. It will all go away as soon as is manageable. Lanza was a Jew. It will all go away. He needed “help”. Oohhhh—look— .the Fiscal cliff is worse—.look over there—..

Some type of Law Enforcement dude did mention something about psychatric meds, as causation, in the Faux “discussion” There was dead silence, for half a beat – and then our Helpful Mulatto counselor moved everything RIGHT back to “treatment”. He’s been using Big Words, in context, too. So this Mulatto is brighter than most.

26 comments

old comment by Regular Guy That's Had Enough

The Falash are caucasoid (classically 'Arabid'). Not 'white' as understood conventionally but proto-caucasian. They can be distinguished by the amateur by their gracile bone structure, 'good hair' and capacity for living in a civilized manner from other Africans.

They are haplogroup L3 which is the root of the out of Africa theory.
Lower Africans are eager to claim L3 populations (Ethiopia, Somali, Eritrean and so on) populations as 'black'. This is because they are the most intelligent and aesthetically pleasing of populations with dark skin. Classical anthropologists referred to what genetics would later identify as L3 as pigmented mediterraneans. The chasm is not so much between L3 and other caucasoidal types but rather L3 and the markedly inferior L2 and L1 groups from western and southern Africa.

Congoids, Pygmies, Khoi, Aborigines (australoids) are not playing in the same genetic league as Iman or Esti Mamo. Even an american nigger such as yourself would shudder at the thought of marrying a pygmy or australian aborigine.

As for racially aware white people declining, I would have to disagree. We white people might not have a 'grapevine' but we do speak freely amongst ourselves in ways we wouldn't - out of politeness and pc training - around those such as yourself. We do want to keep our jobs that we're blessed enough to have thanks to affirmative action.

Just stop trying to put chocolate chips on a cowpie. L3 are not and don't want to be considered 'black'.

old comment by Vox

@Regular Idiot - Untrue. Less than 15% of Somalis and Ethiopians are admixed with other populations. First of all, there is no such thing as a "Caucasoid" genome. Secondly, their Caucasoid craniofacial features are likely from in-situ genetics, meaning they probably ALWAYS looked that way.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethiopians#Genetic_studies

"Indeed, Ethiopians do not seem to result only from a simple combination of proto-NigerCongo and Middle Eastern genes. Their African component cannot be completely explained by that of present-day NigerCongo speakers, and it is quite different from that of the Khoisan. Thus, a portion of the current Ethiopian gene pool may be the product of in situ differentiation from an ancestral gene pool."

Since non-African humans all descend from African humans it's likely that non-black peoples with Caucasoid features probably got those features from Horn peoples. Not the other way around.

Few Ethiopians or Somalis would consider themselves non-black in the West, let alone consider themselves "white".

Also, Bantu peoples also have slurs for Horn Africans as well. That doesn't mean they see each other as different races (most Africans don't see Africans as a "race" to begin with anyway). Eastern Europeans have slurs for Western Europeans and vice versa. So your "point" was fucking stupid. Inbred.

"but rather L3 and the markedly inferior L2 and L1 groups from western and southern Africa."

Do tell how a genotype can be inferior, let alone "markedly inferior"? What would a "superior" genotype be? This is completely unscientific language and no modern geneticist floats such notions. If you're going by economics (which is unscientific since economic wealth has jack shit to do with genes) the surrounding largely Bantu-populated countries of Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda and the Nilo-Saharan population of Sudan are for the most part wealthier than Ethiopia and Somalia. Ethiopia and Somalia are 2 of the poorest countries per capita in Africa and Ethiopia has a huge starvation problem. So what "superior" byproducts are the L3 Haplogroup producing?

old comment by Vox

@Regular Idiot - "Tell the gallery in your next reply that you're the equal of a pygmy. Just say, "I'm no better than a pygmy" or "My parents may as well have been pygmies and I'd be no worse for the wear genetically.""

What would be the point?

"I'd have just as much raw genetic potential to succeed in this world but structural anti-pygmyism would hold me back and even if we had a half-pygmy president"

Protip: Financial success or personal achievement has nothing to do with genetics. By that logic African-Americans are genetically superior to Eastern Europeans since African-Americans have a higher income per capita than the average person in Eastern Europe. The median per capita income of African-Americans $18,000 while the highest median per capita income in Eastern Europe is $7,126 in Russia. lol

Try using SCIENCE, dear lad. Not pseudoscientific nonsense you made up on your own.

"Congo Rebels Are Eating Pygmies"

Which has what to do with genetics? There are cannibals all over the world. There were mass reports of cannibalism in war in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s. And MASS RAPE. That means they're genetically inferior, I guess. So are Germans to Americans since they engaged in mass murder and lost to the mixed-race Americans.

BTW, where are these scientific sources that agree with you that Pygmies are "genetically inferior"? We're all still waiting with baited breath for you to define "genetic superiority", how it's identified, what its traits are and what specific genes are inferior or superior? Don't keep us waiting. Bring on those NCBI links since this is established science according to you.

Or does the T,U,V,W have your tongue?

old comment by Vox

@Regular Idiot - "You know you're better than a pygmy by every conceivable metric."

Such as?......

C'mon man, we've been waiting. In what ways are you and I better?

I also notice you avoided my question - since you gauge "superiority" through personal finances (which has jack shit to do with genetics) by your "logic" African-Americans are genetically superior to most Europeans since black Americans have a higher per capita and household median income than the average European. Why did you avoid addressing that?

We all know - because it blows your unscientific banter right out the fucking window. That's why. If you can't answer questions you should know what you're saying is not scientific. Science can withstand inquiry and arduous scrutiny and doesn't have to avoid them like a politician dodging questions from reporters or concerned voters.

"very likely not the equal of a proud little pygmy that can become a Bantu's brunch"

ANYONE can become a "Bantu's brunch" if that Bantu person is a cannibal and has a weapon.

BTW, there are far more groups in Africa than Horn Africans, Pygmies and Bantus. ;) It's like splitting Europeans into just Celts, Basque and Mediterraneans.

Denise #racist occidentaldissent.com

26 comments

Confused?