People mistake dopamine responses for love and willingly submit themselves to relationships. Humans are not meant to belong to one another, yet romance normalizes possession: “You’re mine, so you can’t dress like that,” “You’re mine, so you can’t see other people.”

Romance is an incredibly efficient control mechanism.

In the end, concepts like “romance” and “attraction” exist to sustain heterosexual reproduction. But there are always outliers. Some people project that conditioning beyond its intended target—that’s what we call homosexuality or bisexuality. It’s still rooted in the same overexposure to romantic and sexual conditioning.

From that perspective, homosexuality can be interpreted as a byproduct of excess conditioning. It may be preferable to heterosexual attraction within the system, but that’s still within the system. In a truly normalized state—what I’m calling a post-sex society—no one would feel sexual attraction at all. Romance only exists to preserve reproduction, and once reproduction is no longer necessary, attraction itself becomes irrelevant.

Lesbian relationships, in that sense, are simply relationships between people shaped by similar conditions. They may reduce harm, because both parties understand vulnerability, but they don’t fundamentally change the structure. Dressing it up as love doesn’t change the outcome.

Ultimately, real freedom comes from facing reality directly, not escaping into emotional illusions.

A post-sex world isn’t hypothetical—it’s inevitable.

In the end, we’ll find peace.