[From "ICC Warrant for Putin"]

International Criminal Court (ICC)[…]issued arrest warrants[…]Putin and[…]Lvova-Belova[…]allegations[…]Russia had been forcibly removing Ukrainian children[…]
ICC’s action against Russia’s leader has the potential to lead to world war and eventual world government — precisely in keeping with the designs of those who originally created the UN-centered international system[…]
International Court of Justice (ICJ)[…]was brought into being as one of the six principal organs of the UN[…]In accordance with the precedent of the war-crimes tribunals[…]whose purpose was to try Nazi and Japanese “war criminals,” the globalists who framed the UN system also desired an international court[…]
Such tribunals have been justifiably criticized, not only for the nebulous and decidedly biased legal doctrine of victor’s justice, but also for reliance on ex post facto law[…]
Similar criticisms dogged the Yugoslav and Rwandan war-crimes tribunals[…]Solution brought forth by globalists[…]purported to solve the problem[…]
Veteran reporter for The New American William F. Jasper was present at the Rome conference in 1998, and warned at the time: “If allowed to stand — and to thrive and grow[…]sound the death knell for national sovereignty, and for the freedoms associated with limited, constitutional government”[…]
The Rome Statute defined four classes of crimes[…]Article 6 of the convention characterizes “genocide”[…]
Notice how broad the language is[…]
Similar vagueness plagues the definitions of other classes of “crimes against humanity.” “War crimes,” for example, are held to include “willful killing”[…]while “aggression” is defined as “the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty"[…]
Putin now has even more of an incentive to either win at any cost or go down fighting