@Skyknight

Megha #wingnut #homophobia #sexist #elitist fxtwitter.com

(She’s responding to a whimsical finish to a man’s wedding announcement.)

“No take backsies!!” 😵‍💫

Many modern men are gay, even when they’re straight. This is a serious issue. If men cannot be serious, society cannot accomplish serious things. Proper standards of dignity must be enforced via judgement.

Megha #wingnut #homophobia #sexist #psycho fxtwitter.com

(Submitter’s note: “Thymotic” seems to refer to the Platonic concept of the thymos, the portion of the soul that contained such things as pride, shame, and indignation. Also remember that this is a woman posting.)

Gay is a word I could write a whole treatise about.

What makes men gay is a rejection or abdication of his God Given thymotic rage. When he acts like a ‘lil bi*ch’

It’s primarily psychological and the sodomy is the logical conclusion of it, but not the central aspect of it.

Megha #wingnut #elitist fxtwitter.com

(Submitter’s note: Two successive tweets)

Any “right wing” person who wastes their time “debating” leftists has already admitted defeat.

You need to be elitism maxxing. You need to make the stupids know they’re not invited to the conversation. You need to be imposing your will on the world and curating elite networks.

Losers debate. Winners give a haughty laugh from their silk gowns and shut the doors on people who are not spiritually or intellectually worthy of being taken seriously. The enlightenment was a mistake.

Agnar #psycho #wingnut #racist #enbyphobia #transphobia #sexist twitter.com

SinistralRifleman: The 2nd Amendment is for everyone.

This is something I’ve believed for years, and something many people I know have also believed. But it’s apparently a controversial statement now.

Agnar: I don’t want communists, Chinese people, antifa, gender psychos, or people who voted for Joe Biden in the 2020 election to have 2nd amendment rights.

Not sorry, just want to have a country in 20 years, thanks.

Ben Garrison #quack #wingnut #conspiracy gizmodo.com

Ben Garrison, a right-wing cartoonist known for his opposition to vaccines and his extremely flattering drawings of former President Donald Trump, told Gizmodo late Sunday that he contracted covid-19 and has been sick for about two weeks. But allegedly getting covid hasn’t changed Garrison’s mind about modern medical science.

[…]

“Yes, it’s definitely Covid and we’ve had all the symptoms. My wife and (I) went out with a couple to a restaurant and the next day all four of us were sick. One of us went to see a doctor and was told she had Covid, and that was the clincher,” Garrison told Gizmodo via email. (Garrison has been banned from Twitter for supporting the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6.)

“We’re taking Ivermectin and various vitamins including a lot of Zinc,” Garrison continued, explaining what he’s doing to treat the disease. The cartoonist also notes he’s taking beet root juice. None of this has been proven to treat or prevent covid-19, with monoclonal antibodies and vaccines being the only real ways to fight this pandemic, which is still raging in many parts of the world.

[…]

Garrison told Gizmodo that he and his wife are not feeling well and that he’s completely lost his sense of taste and smell. Garrison seems to believe that he and his wife are struggling to overcome the disease because they’re in their mid-60s.

“Both Tina and I feel slightly better after two weeks, but it has been rough. I lost my taste and smell as well as desire to eat any kind of food. I lost 15 pounds as a result. Young people tend to bounce back more quickly, but we’re in our mid-60s,” Garrison wrote.

When Gizmodo asked Garrison whether he’d been vaccinated against covid-19, he repeated many of the same conspiracy theories that appear in his cartoons.

“We will never take their foul spike protein-producing jabs, which are neither safe nor effective. They’re not real vaccines. They’re gene therapy,” Garrison wrote in an email to Gizmodo.

[…]

Garrison says he’d never visit a hospital to treat his covid-19.

[…]

“I would never go to a hospital with Covid. Robert David Steele did it a few weeks ago and they killed him. The hospitals get extra money for Covid death reports, which is necessary to keep fear ramped up,” Garrison claimed in an email to Gizmodo.

Archer…Sterling Archer #fundie breakingnewsandreligion.online

Whether you suffer eternal punishment or not has nothing to do with what you DO; it has everything to do with what you ARE.You are not a sinner because you sin; you sin because you are a sinner.

Sin is the rejection of God - rejection of His life, His goodness,His will, His gifts, His creation of you - in preference for your own will. He alone is creative, therefore, to prefer your own will is to prefer destruction. God does not send people to Hell because they were "bad"; He sends you to Hell because that's what you chose. You reject Him who is Light, therefore He gives you darkness; you reject Him who is joy, therefore He gives you sorrow; you reject Him who is love, therefore He gives you hatred; you reject Him who is your gracious Creator, therefor He gives you eternal separation from Him....an eternity of loneliness. You wanted an existence where you were your own god, so He gives you that; you can have all of eternity to try to create your own universe.

Vincent Cheung #fundie vincentcheung.com

The spiritual condition of the clergy is often reflected in the general believers. The ministers who preach sound theology and practice godliness give clear direction to the people, who can then apply biblical precepts to their life and thought, resulting in godly living. Now, contrary to what many people believe, Christians must obey even hypocritical ministers as long as these ministers teach sound doctrine, even if they disobey it
themselves: "The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat. So you must obey them and do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach" (Matthew 23:2-3). Therefore, providing biblical teaching without personal examples should be sufficient to command obedience in the people; nevertheless, Scripture commands a minister to be a good example to the people by his godly conduct, so that he does not become a hypocrite in denying what he preaches by his sinful behavior (Titus 1:16). In any case, a person can never excuse his disobedience by pointing to hypocritical ministers. Each of us will give an account to God.

In other words, a person must not require an example to model after before he obeys God, but he should only require knowledge of what God commands; however, it remains a minister's duty to be an example of godly living (1 Timothy 4:12; 1 Corinthians 9:27). Without personal examples, some people might find it more difficult to apply God's word to their lives; nevertheless, when there is no one who can serve as an example of godly living, a Christian should still be able to obey God by imitating Christ based on the information about him in Scripture (1 Corinthians 11:1; Ephesians 5:1; John 10:4-5; Hebrews 12:2).

The fact that ministers carry the responsibility of teaching and obeying the word of God (Matthew 5:19) does not mean that the rest of the people are blameless when spiritual decline occurs. The Bible notes that even when there is nothing wrong with the ministers, the people often rebel against the Lord: "But the house of Israel will not hearken unto thee; for they will not hearken unto me: for all the house of Israel are impudent and hardhearted" (Ezekiel 3:7); "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables" (2 Timothy 4:3-4). Since apostasy cannot be blamed solely on the clergy, Malachi turns to address the people, and reprimands them for their lack of devotion to the Lord.

God first reminds the hearers of his immutability, saying, "I am the Lord, I change not" (v. 6). God's attributes remains the same, and they will never change. He is not subject to any external influence, and he is eternal so that there is no before or after in his being, so that he does not change. His omniscience implies that he has no succession of thoughts, and therefore he does not change his mind. His knowledge and decisions eternally exist in his mind, and are not subject to alteration. Since he knows all, he does not gain knowledge, and nothing surprises him. Since he is eternally immutable and comprehensively perfect, he never becomes better or worse.