Jacob Harrison #fundie #homophobia

Jacob Harrison #fundie #homophobia forums.fstdt.net

I apologize for not doing research that conversion therapy does not work.

Because of that, I revise what the government should do to cure homosexuality which is to make it required by law for doctors to provide chemical castration drugs that will make homosexuals asexual.

It will be beneficial to their self esteem because they won’t feel depressed over falling in love with heterosexuals of the same gender who will obviously not return their love.

Tolpuddle Martyr tried to debunk my argument that the natural purpose of sex is procreation by saying that the natural purpose is descriptive not prescriptive. However all our natural traits have prescriptions. We have feet for walking, running, kicking, dancing, or driving cars, however our prescription is that we put on shoes when we go out of our house and not at a beach.

We assign prescriptive roles to natural purposes. For millennia, humans understood that the purpose of sex was procreation hence the institution of marriage.

Before the evil legalization of the mass murder of unborn babies, and before the invention of condoms, even prostitutes knew that having sex would produce children that they would be responsible for raising.

So that is the reason why God hates homosexual sex.

19 comments

old comment by Anon-e-moose

Then Jerkob wonders why he's a regular recipient of Mjolnir there?

The inevitable response from mod Askold says it all.

Human beings learn from their mistakes. In this case, not thinking in such a way as to cause one to come out with such things; it's called the neural filter known as Political Correctness.

Correct you're not, Jerkob.

If you don't want to be banned from there too: as in permanently, then change your way of thinking: completely.

If long-time Christian Jonathan Edwards could: and he recanted of his beliefs & became an Atheist, then what's your excuse, Jerkob: and you became a Protestant after recanting of your Catholic beliefs, so what's your excuse II...?!

@Tricky Fox

This guy has been on and off the forums for a while now, popping up to spew esoteric nonsense like this before vanishing before the cycle repeats

Carry on the way you do Jerkob, and you'll be permab& from that site too. Give their admin Sigmaleph just one good reason why you shouldn't.

old comment by Skide

Yo, Harrison, you know why unlike some of my good friends here, I am not a mod? I`m waay too cruel with turds like you. The good pharaoh had you banned, therefore he instituted a regime of self-improvemnt, which you of course failed but he did(therefore he tried to improve you, it is your failure to do so, which makes you oh so hilalrious). I would just let you pollute our fields for some more, till I was full, gorged like a succubi on your stupidity and ignorance, since it is what feeds me most(aside from dumplings, dumplings are always my prefered food). To me, you are a lolcow of a good caliber, a large, succulent target to suck dry out of the lulz you create. In short you are utterly pathetic creep, not unlike chris-chan, only more specialised, I suppose.

I`m the site`s pet .chan monstrosity, all nicely domesticated and I think I even know how to bring back the tennis ball now, still...
You actually better wish I`m being kept on a low cretin diet...

old comment by Zinnia

That's clever, in its own messed-up, ignorant way. But it wouldn't to work.

Killing someone's sex drive doesn't change who they find attractive, it just deprives them of any desire to act on it. In addition, people have a romantic orientation as well as a sexual orientation; the majority of homosexuals are also homoromantic, and thus would still seek out non-hetero romantic relationships, given the chance.

And even if you could somehow make someone both asexual and aromantic, you'd still have to deal with the fact that such people still get pressured into "being" heterosexual. And occasionally raped for failing to do so, particularly ace women. But I bet some homophobes would accept that as an acceptable "compromise".

old comment by Pharaoh Bastethotep

And occasionally raped for failing to do so, particularly ace women.

Considering they also believe that being molested by men turns boys homosexual, they really seem to think that the penis is some kind of magic drug, don't they? Or, in the kind of silly rhyme similar kinds of fetish scenes seem to like: "Once you try dick, to it you'll stick."
Whether this is caused by their own inflated belief in their sexual prowess or repressed homosexuality on their own part remains an open question.
Regardless, how the hell anyone can think that being raped would actually increase one's affinity for the rapist's sex is baffling to say the least.

old comment by Jacob Harrison

I am not saying that being raped automatically makes someone homosexual. However if they have homosexual parents, and are exposed to their parents having romance, then homosexuality will be the sexuality that they will mainly be exposed to. The fact that some people are born homosexual, does not prove that all homosexuals are born homosexual.

A good example of this was a situation with a former friend. He was adopted and had two dads, and asked me permission to sit on me, without even asking me about my sexual orientation. I told him that he lost my trust, and I left the car.

In the past, homosexual sex was seen as morally detestable as incest between siblings, or sex with mothers and fathers. Homosexuality being tolerated as normal is a slippery slope to incestual sex, becoming accepted in society.

And haven’t you guys noticed that I have not been promoting Roman Catholicism anymore? Hmm, why do you think? This post explains why. http://forums.fstdt.net/index.php?topic=7846.0

old comment by hydrolythe

@Jacob Harrison

What you're saying is ridiculous. My sister sat multiple times on me and I sat multiple times on my dad and mother. Does that make me incestuous?

And we care jack shit about your religion. We are die-hard radicals and jacobins who wish that engaging in homosexual acts does in no way entail legal repercussions. You know, like how John Stuart Mill always wanted it.

And the Bible does make an exception for prophets. You can distinguish a wizard from a prophet by the fact that prophets never fail. So, technically a prophet, who goes to a magic school and succeeds at everything, isn't worthy of your scorn. Of course to me, magic doesn't exist, it's engineering that does.