RE: Lolipill Ideology.

(personalityinkwell)

i'm still waiting for lolipillers to address the unavoidable fact that young girls simply aren't attracted to them

lolipillers have always dodged this inconvenient truth, and i expect them to keep dodging

i'll continue to wait patiently for them to address this

Lolis have less life experience, and thus lower standards. Also lolis may want a young developed man over a little boy their age.

Problem is it's impossible to verify since merely approaching one is illegal, so we can only speculate. There isn't a way to clear cut verify it like you can with 18+ foids. All you can really say in response is "they probably aren't attracted to you, if you think you have any remote chance, you are coping."

(TrashCanCel)

i'm still waiting for lolipillers to address the unavoidable fact that young girls simply aren't attracted to them

In today's environment, I fully agree with you. Girls aged 7-8 have already been exposed to social media and the rest of modern Western culture. As a result, they have the same standards as other, older, foids.

Imo, "lolipillers" are in fact misguided tradcels (in most cases). What they truly want is women uncorrupted with globohomo slut-worship, which is obviously impossible to find today. I think "lolipillers" should just admit that either they want traditional submissive women or that they are just plain old pedophiles. For clarity's sake, the two issues should be kept separate

(micropenis29)

Lolis have less life experience, and thus lower standards. Also lolis may want a young developed man over a little boy their age.

i'd think less life experience = higher standards

i.e. the young girls who follow around celebrity gigachad, fantasizing about one day being his wife or a part of his harem