Absolutely, the hu(man) revolt against encroaching technology is being pushed in the various algorithms, certainly mine. At this stage, I think the most likely resolution will be a quiet reinstatement of the status quo after this flurry of male outrage. In the testeric chaos, many women will feel compelled to make themselves useful by serving one male side or another, which is imo, the probable reason that males engage in these hype sessions in the first place, whether they are conscious of that or not. As you say, therefore babiez.

Anyone still under the impression that AI/Chatgpt etc, is ‘human’ or intelligent, will probably wake up once the hype has blown over and perhaps a good portion of the population will continue to use AI to summarise wiki articles for them in a soothing voice. While that usage is destructive to critical thinking skills and possibly social skills (though I’m less confident commenting on that), it does not exactly match the imminent threat that would cause men to go to war on the clankers, while women make themselves useful by upholding the human tradition of marriage and babies. These men make me sick. Women’s traditional role is not compatible with freedom. It is compatible at best with material comfort and status.

Also, if any of these men are at the point of crying about robots or have just felt wretched forever ‘for no reason’, I have a tentative theory that they may be naturally miserable because of a subconscious awareness of how dangerous they are to women. Thus, it will probably always remain a great mystery to them. But as far as I’m concerned, that mystery is solved. Women have obvious reasons for being miserable, if they are even at the point of admitting that they do feel miserable. But unfortunately most of them either loudly buy into the pseudo-freedom of material excess, or they sit in sleep mode like robots(!) next to some windbag. And being highly educated does not exclude a woman from being a man’s robot, far from it.