This whole “consent” thing is a retarded Jewish invention that overcomplicates basic male-female interaction. If a woman doesn’t want to have sex, she resists, if she wants to stop having sex while having sex, she makes it known. If she for some reason decides to pretend to be okay with having sex while not feeling like having sex, then that’s her problem. Literally something that happens in her mind that can’t be measured or proven.
This is a strawman argument. The “libtards” are not as stupid as you imply here. Nobody expects husbands to read their wive’s minds, but when you say something like “sex with your wife should be a legal right,” you are implying that sex should be taken by unwilling participants, since ‘human rights’ are things that people (or, in this case, you really mean “men” and “male rights”) should be granted regardless of others wanting to give it to them. A police officer can’t just decide not to respect your right to privacy, so if a man had a right to sex, it would be the same way.