@Skide #160127
My mistake - LOL, it’s NOT your political sympathies. It’s your biased characterization of motives that you dishonestly say is a stated goal.
I mean, I guess it’s a theoretical goal, and in that it was stated by you, it qualifies as ‘having been stated,’ but you’re still a damned liar. No one said their goal was overthrowing a democratically elected government. That’s an obviously absurd claim.
It’s the equivalent of someone saying that the attacks on government buildings during BLM riots had a stated goal of destroying any law enforcement apparatus that would resist allowing black people to commit crimes with impunity. I could probably find someone equally as radical and absurd as you on the opposite end of the political spectrum who would claim that was a stated goal.
You can try to hand wave away the accusation, but it’s still your political sympathies (or some BS you regurgitate motivated by your sympathies) that you believe should be the difference between an action being considered acceptable and the same action being punished as a crime.
I wonder if you can even remember what having principles felt like.