Jan 6th was a lie. Officer Sicknick wasn’t murdered. It wasn’t a deadly insurrection. (Except for Ashli Babbitt’s murder.) Police opened doors for QAnon shaman. He wasn’t armed. Ray Epps lied about leaving the Capitol. No wonder 61% of people believe Jan 6 was staged by feds.
30 comments
@Conscience #159109
Apparently, yes, at least according to Rasmussen. After seeing that POS version Fucker put out last week or something anyway…
This is fucking shameful. And assholes like Lizard Wheel aren’t helping!!?
“Jan 6th was a lie.”
“Officer Sicknick wasn’t murdered.”
"It wasn’t a deadly insurrection. (Except for Ashli Babbitt’s murder.)”
“Police opened doors for QAnon shaman”
“He wasn’t armed.”
Yeah, that’s why we have video of Members of Congress running for their lives. Sorry, Liz, but too many people watched it live to be convinced by Fucker Carlson’s attempted whitewash.
Carlson was given 41,000 hours of footage. There are 8760 hours in a year, so it would take one person over 5 years to watch it all. Carlson’s had it for what, a month? Unless he’s got thousands of people watching, he hasn’t had time to review much of it. My guess is he started at the beginning, when everything was still calm, and just stopped watching when things started to go to hell.
Just because the police aided them doesn’t mean it’s not an insurrection. Everyone knows you need police and military support to do a coup… Maybe except that one guy last year, Bolzonero or something like that? Went on TV, claimed he’s in power, kicked out an hour later.
It’s not an insurrection, when my side does it, even when it is…
As for letting Chansley and the others into the Capitol, if the police did so, it sounds a bit like the way they leave the gates open at railway stations. Then, when people give into temptation and walk through without a ticket, they can nab them.
@0 #159172
No, dickwad, what makes it an insurrection was specifically the intent to overthrow or otherwise force yourselves upon the legitimate government and its representatives.
Call the BLM protest riots all day long if that’s your angle but they were NOT comparable to an insurrection, because, once again, they were protestive in nature, unlike your precious Jan 6, which aimed at overthrowing legally elected officials.
@0 #160097
Naah, nothing to do with Skidie’s political sympathies here. Once again we are talking fucking definition of a word. You can call it a protest, you can call it a riot but the stated goal of theirs was not to overthrow the democratically elected government. Jan 6th people literally put it as their stated goal, to overturn the legally conducted election. It’s not about who I or you for that matter support, it’s about the actual definition of what a protest, hell a riot versus a coup is.
Dictionary time for you once again, I’m afraid. Dickwad.
@Skide #160127
My mistake - LOL, it’s NOT your political sympathies. It’s your biased characterization of motives that you dishonestly say is a stated goal.
I mean, I guess it’s a theoretical goal, and in that it was stated by you, it qualifies as ‘having been stated,’ but you’re still a damned liar. No one said their goal was overthrowing a democratically elected government. That’s an obviously absurd claim.
It’s the equivalent of someone saying that the attacks on government buildings during BLM riots had a stated goal of destroying any law enforcement apparatus that would resist allowing black people to commit crimes with impunity. I could probably find someone equally as radical and absurd as you on the opposite end of the political spectrum who would claim that was a stated goal.
You can try to hand wave away the accusation, but it’s still your political sympathies (or some BS you regurgitate motivated by your sympathies) that you believe should be the difference between an action being considered acceptable and the same action being punished as a crime.
I wonder if you can even remember what having principles felt like.
@0 #161710
So many words you had to use to say “I missed the fuck out of your point”. Yes, dickwad the jan 6 people were specifically attempting to strong-arm the congress into pushing their failed candidate through, they were literally trying to overthrow the will of the people during the last election,many of them said it themselves and it was the stated goal of their movement. In case I really need to spell it for you, they were open about wanting to force their guy upon the government, the BLM people were a reactive protest, violent or not it never had a stated goal to push through an illegitimate head of state. You can attack a gov building without a goal to overthrow the gov as such, you can specifically target the SEAT of the government to enforce a loser candidate to overturn the legally conducted elections.
You problem here, is that you have no principles yourself beyond “hate teh woke/prog/left” If you weren’t basically a tribalistic monkey, you could easily have given me the obvious point, yet you choose to die to this very proverbial hill simply because admitting something to a person you consider as your “target” would be internally seen as a weakness. You wouldn’t be able to understand my principles in the first place, mostly because you sorely lack any yourself.
No one said their goal was overthrowing a democratically elected government.
”We’re storming the Capitol, it’s a revolution!”
Unless, of course, you are trying a slight of hand there, in that the J6ers do not accept Biden as democratically elected. However, obviously, NO insurrection would ever openly call the rule they seek to overthrow legitimate.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
