new

Azisfan #conspiracy #sexist tumbex.com

A reminder to NEVER do your feminist activism through politicking. It literally doesn't work and can't work by design, because politics is a male conspiracy that serves the purpose of ensuring their exploitation of women in private relationships would go as smoothly as possible. Ie it's an add-on, just a cherry on top to make the real thing stronger. If we want to get rid of patriarchy we need to concentrate on liberating ourselves from personal relationships with men as much as possible. This is something that every woman can more or less do (even being a "bad lazy" housewife changes your life dramatically compared to being a "good hardworking" one), this is something that unlike networking with other women is easy for women to organise and, most importantly, this is something that can liberate us from patriarchy even now. Of course it can't liberate us from male violence - because that's beyond our control, - but it definitely does from their parasitism.

Azisfan #sexist tumbex.com

In male mind creativity is synonymous with destruction and conquest. Just how many words have they turned upside down?
True female creativity is an ensemble of various voices and harmonies, male "creativity" is a triumphant laugher among thousands of painful moans.

#they are incapable of being creative - making something that deviates from the intended logical goal #ie influenced and modified by surroundings/others. in other words brand new even for themselves #because they are simply too agressive and materialistic. seeing only gain and compartmentalising everything else #destruction/creativity are strict opposites when they mean the same thing it can only be an evidence of something perverse going on #in case of patriarchal goddesses it was misogyny - they are recognised as sources of creativity that can hurt the patriarchal necro-state #in case of men they can only embody the destruction so by using sophistic “logic” they claim to embpdy creativeness too #which is supported by the annihilation of all things that stay in their way. thus all male intentions not only manifest unmodified #but also appear as if supported by nature itself #very similar to true creativity but absolutely not the same. its a true antithesis

Azisfan #sexist tumbex.com

I think the problem is that most feminists haven't fully exorcised the male-loving self from their mind. Like they still abide in one way or another to obvious male syphoning of female resourses:

1. motherhood of sons: did you know that males literally manipulate their moms to take care of them more than females? Like male rats have evolved to smell better afaik so their mother would lick them more - it is not mother's choice to favour her sons, they've evolved to manipulate her to do so (because the more males steal from females the better their prospects);

2. "partnership" with men - always modeled after mother-son relationship, because it is the only way women and men can naturally bond, so likewise oppressive (if men do not recognise woman as a mother, they other her and feel paranoid about her - a very common and true observation);

3. think that it's normal to raise children with a father - do i even need to explain this one? Mammalian males almost never do childcare and are violent to children too, because evolving to be that way is much easier. Scrotes marry women and start families with us for easy access - consealed estrus is really troublesome for them otherwise.

Well that's just a couple of examples, but there are a lot of such "blind spots". Basically feminists tend to not approach those thinks critically and instead naturalise them. The end result of which is the idea that "matriarchy" (which is honestly oppressive to women because in such a society we are still forced to live with parasitoid genestealers, aka "men" - in female only society we need no law, but in matriarchy we need taboos to regulate men) is going to be beneficial to men! After all, see, women ~naturally~ do so many loving things for and with men! So many, that essentially men apparently will get all the same things they want to get through patriarchy anyway lol. One can't help but wonder why establish patriarchy in the first place? Could it be that women are actually naturally opposed to ~personal relationships~ (read: resourse syphoning) with men? This is all just lack of comprehension and refusal to go to the end of one's thoughts

Azisfan #crackpot #dunning-kruger tumbex.com

Also, since when males were supposed to be an "experimental sex"? Are you trying to prove greater male variability with your own philosophical interpretation of nature? That doesn't work, because what objectively males are is parasitoid genestealers, who have no purpose existing outside of perpetuating themselves. This is something geneticists will openly admit to you, because all the benefits that males supposedly bring to the species are heavily outweighted by negatives such as their high cost of production. Not to mention sexual reproduction is only theoretically good to weed out bad mutations, but practically is not helping with that at all (men accumulate a shit ton of mutations due to their rapid sperm production for starters).

[...]

PS: I cannot provide sources for my claims, sorry, but they are either searchable or logically coherent. The reason for it is that I gave up collecting all those studies like pokemons and deleted them all from my favorites, because it was really some kind of soul-draining consumerism. Ideally, just saying one contradiction should be enough to disprove it (as per the status of hypothesis) and yet I feel pressured to overexplain myself to cover all the weak spots possible. That's because people believe such things, like "women are more emotional", because they want, and therefore all the evidence for the validity of said ideas is literally fabricated by the virtue of self-fullfilling prophecy.