Top posts since
last month

www.lolcow.farm

Anon #homophobia #sexist lolcow.farm

I know this website is generally pro-lesbian so there is a moral pressure to pretend they have a male equivalent for equality's sake, but you all need to stop this 90s fag "men have an ironclad innate sexuality" nonsense immediately.

Biologically there's no such thing as a man who's "gay" or "straight". They are social self-IDs, not objective responses to stimuli or even real world sexual behaviors. Any man can be conditioned into anything with the correct stimuli + enough time and repetition. Men also get more flexible and sexually "complex" with age, i.e. the longer they've been alive. Before technology the average male would not have encountered such a rapid escalation of sexual stimuli so early, so access to porn provides a truly brutal fast-forwarded model of male sexual hyperfunction beginning in childhood and extending past his reproductive prime.

Before someone mentions conversion therapy and inquires why it doesn't work - it's because coomditioning is a one way street, like time and entropy. You can't genuinely reverse the complexity of conditioned sexual responses to "youthful " vanilla default any more than you can reverse aging - at best it'll be a performance/mimicry. A moid factory reset is currently not possible, you can't put toothpaste back in the tube. Because of this, for example, a coomer who's into tranny zoosadist gloryholes can't be coomed into being vanilla by being repeatedly exposed to LESS distressing and stimulating content, much like you can't revert a fent addict into a codeine addict by having him do a weaker opioid. Even if he does eventually make an effort to stick with it, he will always be thinking about fent.

The relapse rates among nofap coomers are consistent with this reality. There is no way out. It is irreversible damage.

Anon #sexist #psycho lolcow.farm

Most of the problems we have in society is because we have a massive male surplus nowadays, which is highly unnatural. In a healthy more natural setting there are 5-10 women for every man. The bulk of low value men are supposed to be culled off before their 25th birthday through wars, fights, accidents, suicide, injuries that turn fatal etc. I don't know why we try to preserve moid lives by offering them modern medicine, draft dodging opportunities or suicide prevention, society would objectively be far better if most men were culled. Low value men offer nothing to society and are a massive financial and societal burden as well as a sexual and safety burden to women and girls. They are literal leeches.

Anon #ableist #sexist #quack #crackpot #psycho lolcow.farm

I think BPDemons would mostly stop existing without males, too. Most BPDs have been understandably conditioned to feel insecure, because their attachments legitimately are insecure, and/or they were raised by mothers who were conditioned the same way. Obviously after living like that for enough time, you can’t ever go back to normal, but I bet if you disappeared men from earth, BPD would be “cured” within 2 generations.
BPD should be renamed born with penis disorder, because it’s a male patterned operative. Excessive fixation on external validation and acceptance, phobic of rejection, neurotic about maintaining attachments, constant shit testing to ensure security. Basically, describing a small gamete’s default relationship with a large gamete. BPD is just NPD without leverage, and NPD is what scrotes get when you artificially give control off the egg over to the sperm.

Misogyny and patriarchy basically flipped the roles of the sexes and forced women to be dependent on transactional male validation, which can be revoked at any point for any reason, and often is, and usually only manifests in exploitation. Males offload their BPD on women whenever they get the chance, and upgrade themselves to NPD. Remove males and the world will heal in more ways than you can imagine.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Gym bros will often pressure women to workout to artificially chase and “earn” their affection, but fat ugly scrotes usually inflict cost on women (making her uglier, fatter, more burdened, basically sucking her life force until she is too fatigued to leave) to keep women artificially chasing and “earning” their affection.
Both suffer from normative male retardation, insecurity, and pussy scarcity neuroticism, and will focus on their particular method of mate acquisition and retention strategies, at the woman’s expense.
We need to stop assuming gymbros are demons until proven human, while offering fat ugly scrotes the benefit of the doubt and assuming them to be human until proven demons.

If you assume all men are equally demonic by default, then you would just choose the hot one, if both are already going to drag you to hell. With fat ugly scrotes you are still subjected to hellish treatment, but you also have to deal with a walrus routinely humping over your dried out pussy.
I don’t believe women are actually objectively attracted to fat ugly scrotes, they’re just attracted to the humanity they incorrectly assume they have.
That and the women who have been psyopped into believing male validation really is the highest achievement in life for a woman, and think a fat ugly mould will be grateful to be blessed by her beautiful presence, and that other male-centered women are less likely to poach her source of male validation (which isn’t even true because these validation starved women are all trying to do the same thing).

Hot, mid, and ugly moids all have the same predatory, exploitative approach when it comes to relationships with women, but also the same weaknesses. You are unlikely to get genuine love from any man, but I’d rather abuse and groom a hot moid into being useful company, rather than waste time trying to convince a chimp to love me, especially an ugly one.