top

Anon #sexist #wingnut lolcow.farm

Lul, commies and evopsych.
A woman's "natural urge and desire" is to avoid mating with a stinking beta male. Said stinking beta male is mad about female wage labor because it further obliterates his reproductive chances - in the past he could easily consort with a woman whose only choice was him or poverty, today he's pretty much doomed because even mopping floors at McDonalds is a preferable option.

All males who whine about neoliberalism or capitalism, as a rule, are scorned betas. There is no male "communism" short of Marx himself that isn't transparently rooted in either resentment towards hypergamy or loss of reproductive leverage. By design, males have no concept of equality or reciprocity, and as such their pinko rhetoric always boils down to incel sex- bargaining.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Who socialized women this way?

Females give birth and nurture a helpless undercooked fetus that's only able to communicate via assorted screams. You misinterpreted one screech from it and it dies. How do women instinctively know what the fetus wants despite not looking like the fetus, not being a fetus herself and having no way to determine what it's thinking through conversation?

This is where the empathy gap comes from. Males did not need to evolve the ability to accurately interpret the mental states of anything that doesn't look like them, so they will never have the same level of concern for women as vice versa. That's why the average whiteknight just wants to get laid, whereas the average pickmeisha is mostly stanning dicks because being mean to males is AbStRaCtLy UnFaIr and ReVeRsE SeXiSt. At the lowest level there is definitely some self interest in the form of prosocial approval and signalling her docility, but it's not as straightforward as stone cold opportunism of "pro female" males.

If women had male levels of empathy/theory of mind, men would be routinely killed and maimed for the kind of treatment they subject women to. No man would tolerate this degree of atrocity while whiteknighting and cooing the gender that perpetrates it. What you refer to as "patriarchy" wasn't established through physical force alone.

What are you going to do if your son is a rapist or an incel? 99% of "feminist" women would promptly make an exemption for him despite tweeting #killallmen all day, even if they're radfems.

Anon #sexist #crackpot #homophobia lolcow.farm

Males are universally (and biologically) more impulsive, prone to wishful judgments, are more likely to act upon them and commit the vast majority of crime in every country for this reason. There is no way that the gender that's celebrated for its impulsivity and violence is also somehow "more rational". All males are already crying faggots because you provide them with care and live at the mercy of their feelings. Males who are physically weaker than women are still as violent as other males, so it's not an issue of body size and opportunity. In the end, the only thing about "socialization" that is constant is that you get all the responsibility, and they get all the power. The school system meme is a boymom and failson delusion that doesn't even need any credible studies - today's mode of learning is objectively more forgiving towards "kinetic learners", "delayed maturity" and other unhinged retardation. In the glorious boys' gymnasiums of the past, boys were beaten and raised in a semi-military hierarchy. Male children perform better in coed environments, while female children perform better in single sex ones, which again suggests that male presence is an unnecessary stressor for girls, likely because males exploit female prosocial tendencies and subconsciously solicit babysitting from them. At this point I should expand on the topic of why gender is already abolished for men, but this post is plenty long.

Tl;dr: do you see how it's not biological essentialism that's the problem, but how it's interpreted and perceived?

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Because women cooperate with men without any rational or utilitarian reason, any woman who chooses to be unconditionally nice to them is (overtly or subconsciously) perceived as a useful idiot/retarded and low value. Understand that it's completely incomprehensible for a male to care for someone on a non-transactional basis - if you choose to do this, you're basically mentally disabled in his eyes, like a human equivalent of a sperm cell giving way to another sperm cell for literally no reason. It's kind of why they berate women for being "irrational" while realizing that they have to be irrational to willingly get involved with men. There are no truly good men, there are bad men who a) can't afford to be openly bad or b) find it more useful to LARP as good at the moment. A male is only as moral as his options allow him to be.

Anons #sexist lolcow.farm

> All porn serves a dual purpose. Wanking is secondary, the primary one is supplying the moid with maladaptive copes he craves so much. One of them is selling the moid a deluded idea that he's "showing" irl women what they have to "compete" with, that he has "options". It's how they avenge the fact that it's much easier for you to diversify. That's why moids think of ethots and pornstars as actual gfs. No matter how "intelligent", they actually do on some level think that they have a real chance and that's how they get robbed blind. Ethots make moid narcissism and Dunning-Kruger work for them.

If you have ever been in a long term relationship, you have probably noticed that your moid suddenly wants you to dress more conservatively, gets uncomfortable about you speaking to other males and wants you to get pregnant as soon as possible. This is moid "securing" behavior. It doesn't mean that he is serious about you or that he loves you, what it means is that he wants to reduce your number of other readily available options to soothe his inherent anxiety over fidelity. Of course once he achieves this he won't be happy and he will hate you, because moids are generally at their happiest pouring resources into a void, stuck chasing a carrot on a stick forever

> Daily reminder that if you have a scrot, looking like you're ready to cheat on him any minute is how you keep him happy and interested. All men are fidelity-anxious cucks by nature, but their tastes are based entirely on what other men find attractive.

> So in summary the scrots who read lolcow fantasize about us being their unwilling sex partners/gfs

> No, they fantasize about being people. Moids are deeply traumatized by the realization that they are slaves to sexual arousal, it clashes with their grandiose self image. Porn is capitalizing on their petty need to "avenge" that somehow. Like most porn, moid copefics generally revolve around a theme of regaining control/upper hand in response to having a boner and "punishing" whatever it is that made them horny. The moid in question is trying to repair the anal fissure he sustained from having his defense mechanisms ripped to shreds (which no doubt aroused him too)

Anon #psycho #sexist lolcow.farm

image

You can’t explain it, not the profound sadness that most if not all women experience on the basis of being born women and being able to empathize with women. The type of sadness that relates to the assumption (or lack thereof) of a woman’s personhood, freedom, dignity, legitimacy, and autonomy. If seeing women as human, even in theory, may cost him a single orgasm, he will not do it. Nothing relating women will be approached or explored with curiosity or empathy. Only misogyny.(...)

No, men will never understand why women are sad as women. This perspective, if ever presented, simply would not register, and certainly never be seen as a valid assessment according to any value system he deems rational. It will never be anything worthy of a moral repudiation or an emotional response. Never.
They choose instead to believe that women are sad because they weren’t hot and young enough to be sex trafficked themselves. Men can only believe women are sad when men deny them, but the worst, most brutal, most painful, most heartbreaking sadness almost always comes when men pursue them. It’s so utterly backwards it feels like the only thing capable of getting through their skulls is a damn bullet.
I wish a race of aliens came to earth and found these ugly fuckers so valuable, desirable, and indispensable, they abduct, imprison, rape, and an anally impregnate them. They’ll finally be happy living life on “easy mode” by being Glorp’s concubines.

(...)

Moids only use their brain matter to invent novel ways of being retarded. They have given us many new retarded methods to calculate now to best land their squirt in a hole. The only thing men are exceptionally good at is the production of sperm which far exceeds its demand. If you lived on a planet where all of your gametes were special and mattered, you could be milked like a cow too. You can finally find your niche in Glorp’s bed chambers.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

There is literally nothing wrong with hypergamy because it serves the interests of children first and foremost. I doubt any of these phalloid entities would want to be fathered by a useless beta male, so why do they wish it upon their own children? It's because what's good for the male is bad for the species. Sexual socialism and deference to males is inherently wrong because it decreases the quality of human race as a whole. In the end, they're expecting you to indulge their "natural" sexual inclinations while yours are to be brutally repressed, which is ordinary male reproductive bargaining disguised as morality.