top

Anon #wingnut lolcow.farm

another subject you have been taught your whole life to feel uncomfortable about is fascism, the first political movement in the 20th century to unapologetically demand equal rights for women, female political representation, and the improvement of women’s socio-economical, intellectual and moral condition.
all scares about fascism are pathetic: there is no fascist movement today, because there is no genuine mass-feminist movement today. fascism preaches the subjugation of big businesses under the state, in service of the state, the rules of honor and dignity, and meritocracy, above the rules of money. which party in the world is trying to accomplish this? maybe the CCP if we wanted to be lenient…
there is a strong hunger for “fascism” in most people, even if the word itself is taboo, and this hunger is exploited by politicians and billionaires for their own benefits, without ever even trying to satisfy it, just as there is a true hunger for feminism that no one wants to satisfy.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Be mindful of male PR and the limitations of your female perspective. You may genuinely be appalled by inequality, but he isn't. A sperm cell doesn't want sexual reproduction to cease, it just wants to get to the egg first. Males are designed for competition and rat racing, it's why they exist.

Any woke male is simply upset that he's not the top dog. Moids are not capable of truly despising hierarchies as a concept, they can only be resentful of their failure to thrive in them. Any 'theory' produced by them is simply an extended rationalization/PR.

Every mama's basement revolutionary wants to be the white capitalist republican pig Chad who gets to reproduce with white bitch Stacy. Because he secretly admires Chad yet desires Stacy, his anger will be reserved for Stacy whom he perceives as reserving her resources for a better male. She symbolizes the fact that he will never advance enough among other males to be selected by her.

In general, anger is a pretty good indicator of desire and deprivation in males. They always hate what they can't have, it's in their nature.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Women are not responsible to train worthless sperm wagons to mimic human decency. The best and most moral thing to do when confronted with selfish, exploitative sperm wagons is to just let them wither and die alone. You don’t train a parasite to not be one, you take away its blood supply and let it die. The parasite is gone, and has none to replace it with, making another “responsibility” (burden) for women in the future.

[...]

He’s operating on selfish scrote logic, you and her operating on wishful-thinking mommy logic. Scrote logic trumps your mommy logic because his is the logic of a parasite, and yours is that of a generous host, trying to compel the parasite to kindness by offering your hide. Lmao.

[...]

Jesus Christ, how horrible. Sperm wagons don’t even deserve to be pissed on when they’re on fire. Look at you, both of you, giving him everything. It’s a crime against nature.

Anon #sexist #transphobia lolcow.farm

Because all men by design have mommy issues, perpetually avenging a trauma inflicted by something known as "maternal omnipotence". All males resent it, but women don't due to their ability to become mothers themselves. Most of what we define as "masculine identity" is just a set of pitiful exercises at establishing oneself outside of mommy's oppressive power. Predictably, everything about this particular LARP revolves around men defining themselves entirely around women and "not being women" as though they ever could be them - another "a-actually I'm choosing this, it's not like I CAN'T do something you can" cope. [...]

You can't help but notice the obvious pussy envy and desire to switch places - males want women to be the easily coomditioned, expendable, sex addicted ones - groveling before the more valuable set of gonads. The ressentiment and envy of a disposable ballsack thus culminates in trooning out. Is it really surprising how obsessed AGPs are with the "mommy" narrative? AGP is the absolute pinnacle of male coping, something that's usually followed by surrender and death.

Males have no sexual fantasies, all they have is predictable eroticized copes. You can coom-meme them into anything including killing themselves, if you push the right buttons. They're not people, they're a malignant growth around their semen pustules.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

1. What males say they want and what they really want are two really different things. Pickmes never win.

2. Males' stated demands and standards are a) coping mechanisms of an inherently defective individual or b) attempts to dupe you. They know that they're using you and they will despise you for letting yourself be used. They are aware that their sexual role is inherently parasitic and destructive, so they are organically unable to respect women (or other men) who give in to their demands. In mammalian reproduction, sperm is the worthless gamete while the ovum is rich in resources. Due to this, males universally understand being given reproductive opportunity as a form of loss on the giver's part. Any claims otherwise are an attempt to negotiate a better arrangement (in which a male provides nothing in exchange for some abstract immeasurable benefit like "romantic love" while calculating the fuck out of cost/benefit on his end).

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

[ Refering to Lundy Bancroft's "Why Does He Do That?", a book about tactics used by male abusers ]

lundy bancroft's book is brilliant, but it understandably doesn't explain why in a more global, all-encompassing, elegant sense. his book, as it should have, still left the nebulous possibility of "good men". a proper framework should explain why a value judgment like this cannot apply, that there's only a man that finds it useful or has the capacity to be abusive, and a man that doesn't.

their nature innately biases them towards perceiving prosociality/kindness as deference/submission. in a male mind, there's no need to be nice unless you have to be, and that can only happen because you're too weak to just take what you want. no matter how many phony layers of civilization and decorum they slap on top of this, even to the point of losing their own acute awareness of it, it still shines as bright as day and is most noticeable in pre-socialized males (toddler to elementary school age). they absolutely hate dealing with this between themselves of course, but they don't have the capacity to change even for their own sake - let alone women's. for a male, might is right.

ironically, by being staunch blank slatists feminists have lost their only ability to fashion males into the most convincing facsimile of a "good person" possible - removing any and all material power they hold over women would give them a selfish incentive to be nice (display submission).