(Kris Newcomer)
From an outside perspective— of course your son wanted to be a girl to attach himself to you. He had no male FATHER to which to create a healthy attachment to.

That’s another area where ideaology meets reality— it’s one thing to have a gay or lesbian sexuality in theory, or even for oneself, but how does that affect children who deserve both a mother and a father?

I say this not to call judgement on the author of this article or anyone else who identifies as gay/lesbian. But our society has accepted these forms of “marriage” without thinking about the unintended consequences of kids having two dads and no mom or two moms and no dad. Don’t children have a right to both a mother and a father? […] we do need the biological reality of male and female for children to develop healthfully.

(Discrete Music)
Education <— get one

Children of two same-sex parents come out every bit as well-adjusted, and no more likely to be gay, than those wqith opposite-sex parents.

Single parenting is vastly more harmful. All studies show this.

(Marie Descartes)
[…] A generation of LGB raising children has evolved into the natural anthropological outcome that one would expect. Could it be that LGB feelings are as much a confused state as TQ is? […] We have tried reinventing the wheel of society as push back against tradition, religion, mores… and it hasn’t ended well.

(Kris Newcomer)
I agree. I personally don’t understand the LGB desire to recreate marriage and a family— the whole idea of L and G (at least) is a pushback against the natural order of procreation. […] L and G lifestyle is explicitly against the natural order of procreation, so it doesn’t get to turn around and artificially procreate to opt into a family structure that its desires by their very nature rebuke. I realize this is an unpopular opinion, but there you are. I agree with you that I think LGB might be as confused as TQ.