Here I will describe two types of men, and the strategies they employ in hopes of facilitating his access/exploitation of women.

1: Men whose preferred strategy of female access is the promotion of “absolute, indiscriminate equality” between the sexes. By dissuading any behavior that functionally distinguishes men/women, he has less barriers of entry that could impede his access to female supply. Under this system, women are easy pickings for any man.
These can be more hopeful men who think “if only these walls came down, then women will be free to do what they want, which is to please me”. Or more cynical men, who think “if these walls came down, I’d have an even easier time picking off prey”.
For example: commies, libertarians, center-left men “normies”.

2: Men who supports functional gender distinctions to further isolate and funnel women into a “feminine” use category, of which he seeks to exploit by permitting his exclusive access once he meets the conditions to do so (become trans, secure a tradwife).
These men often lean more cynically, thinking that women must be walled-off and forced into a role in order to maintain a position servile to him. There are some hopeful, paternalistic types, who think women would be happier and healthier to relieve themselves of their executive control, and have their lives laid out for them.
Examples: TRAs, tradcons, center-right men “normies”.

It’s difficult to have a conversation with a man of any ideological leaning, because they all form their beliefs around the premise of “facilitating the benefits of female access”. You’ll never come to an understanding, the best you can do is agree where your principles and their strategy happen to cross paths.

For example, making rape illegal:
Men's motivations: “I don't want my female property to be damaged or taken from me by my male competitors."

Women: “through rape, a man impinges on the life, liberty, and happiness of a woman”.