So, this time there was another resolution to honor the life and legacy of Charlie Kirk. But this time there was no such bipartisanship. One hundred and eighteen of the Democratic members of the House either voted “no” or voted to abstain from voting “yes” by voting “present,” or just wouldn’t vote or didn’t show up. That was a majority of all the Democrats.

It did pass, […] they didn’t even want to have the courtesy, after a man had been assassinated, who had such a wide influence on youth of this country, to honor what he had done.

And this brings up a greater question: Why?

Well, if you listen to what Rep. Ilhan Omar said about him, that he was a racist and he was a racist every day of his life. And Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said she was not going to honor him.

And Rep. Jasmine Crockett said Caucasians […] only two Caucasians, she said, had voted “no.” In fact, if you include the presents and those who didn’t vote, there were quite a lot of proverbial white people that did not want to honor him.

But all three of those representatives […] had one thing in common. They either did not quote or cite evidence that Charlie Kirk was a racist or, to the degree they tried to quote or refer to something he said, they did it inaccurately. Because he was not a racist.

In fact, there are plenty of clips when he is the master of ceremonies, and someone in the audience says he is a racist, a white supremacist, Charlie Kirk gets very angry and debates him and refutes him. So, it was just the opposite.

[…]

You got to collate when this event, this callousness took place. This is at a time when Tyler Robinson just simply killed Charlie Kirk, murdered him, and was a hardcore leftist, and had trans issues.

This was at a time when, we talked about earlier, Iryna Zarutska had been murdered by a 14-time released felon.

This was a time when Luigi Mangione assassinated a UnitedHealthcare executive and was canonized by the Left.