www.truthxchange.com

Rayburne F. Winsor #homophobia truthxchange.com

There is no such thing as “gay Christianity” , no more than there is a category of Christians called “gay Christians,” “immoral Christians,” “sodomite Christians,” “idolater Christians,” or “adulterer Christians”. As the apostle Paul makes perfectly clear in 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, especially verse 11, the Gospel of salvation in Jesus Christ is the power of God to spiritually transform from the inside out the hearts and lives of all the unrighteous members of Adam’s fallen race (equals all of us )–all whose sins have spiritually separated us from God (Isaiah 59:2; Romans 3:10, 23; Romans 1:16-17), including the sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, homosexuals, sodomites, drunkards, revilers, extortioners, etc,(see 1 Corinthians 6:9-10): “And such were some of you ; but you are washed, but you are sanctified , but you are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus , and by the Spirit of our God.” (verse 11). So please note, as was true in Paul’s day, that just as the Gospel was able to save/deliver any sinner, heterosexual or homosexual, from the corrupting power and bondage of all sin , including homosexuality, then, so it is able to do so today. As the Bible explicitly states: “Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creation : old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new” (2 Cor. 5:17). “Any man” , of course, includes the homosexual , and to be “in Christ” means to be saved–to become a Christian or Spirit-regenerated, Spirit-adopted son and daughter of God through the life-changing power of the Spirit of God in the new birth and faith in Jesus Christ (John 1:12-13; Ephesians 2:1, 5; 8-9; Titus 3:5; Acts 16:14; etc.). God bless.

Dr. Peter Jones #homophobia #conspiracy #fundie truthxchange.com

Androgyny: The Pagan Sexual Ideal

Introduction
Like the ancient pagan Sodomites pounding on the door of Lot’s house millennia ago, the modern gay movement is gathering at the doors of our churches, our academies and our once traditionally “Christian” culture, demanding entrance and full recognition. Notable scholar, David A. J. Clines, professor of Old Testament at Sheffield University, for one, appears ready to lay down the welcome mat. He wrote in 1998:

…[though] queer theory has yet to show its face at the SBL [Society of Biblical Literature], gayness is challenging…all that we hold dear. When we begin to redraw the alterity map, the boundaries between same and different…we find ourselves having to think through everything, and not just sexuality, from scratch.

Clines, who not long ago was known for his conservative theological position, illustrates how far acceptance of the gay movement has come in recent years, even among those from strongly biblical backgrounds.

This movement has come a long way fast. It will not go away soon, I believe, because it is so intimately tied to deep changes in modern society, in particular, those associated with philosophical Postmodernism. Because in the Postmodern hermeneutic all meaning is socially generated, queer commentary has little methodological difficulty finding a place in the contemporary religious and theological debate. In cooperation with feminist biblical interpretation, which has “destabilized normative heterosexuality” by alleging “sexist” bias, queer readings merely seek to take one more step in the hermeneutics of suspicion and expose the “heterosexist bias” of the Bible and Bible interpreters. Identifying exegesis as an exercise in social power, queer theorists reject the oppressive narrowness of the Bible’s male/female binary vision, and boldly generate textual meaning on the basis of the “inner erotic power” of the gay interpreter. What could be more Postmodern? Employing such a widely accepted methodology, and with “straight” Bible scholars now ready “to redraw the alterity map,” gay theology appears to have a bright future everywhere.
[...]
The thesis of this paper is that to understand the contemporary sexual revolution, we need to see the “new sexuality,” [particularly in this paper in its homosexual expression], as an integral expression of age-old religious paganism. In our response, we cannot follow Lot, who would have sacrificed his daughters to placate the aggressors. Nor can we claim personal moral superiority. We must always hear, in the clamor for acceptance and recognition, the cry of divine image-bearers, however marred and broken. However, we must not shrink back from seeking to do justice to the whole Christian, biblical dimension of the problem. In a time of moral confusion and politically correct intimidating “tolerance,” we owe such clarity to our culture, to our sons and daughters, and to God, Creator and Redeemer, for whom all things exist.