@OQ83

Vox Day #dunning-kruger voxday.net

Evolutionary biology actually makes astrology look scientific by comparison. I mean, in the case of astrology there are at least actual planets and stars and constellations one can observe even if they don’t influence anyone’s destiny or behavior. Evolution by natural selection and genetic drift is rather like astrology if there weren’t any planets, any stars, or anything at all in the sky.

The amusing thing is the way that evolutionists keep trying to point to birds and butterflies and bones as somehow proving anything at all. It’s exactly like the man, who upon being challenged on his claim of having walked from Los Angeles to New York City in five minutes, argues that if you will only turn on the television, you will see that there are, in fact, people living in not only Los Angeles, but also San Francisco and Chicago!

Well, yes, that’s all very true, but it’s also beside the point.

You can’t reason with these retards, which is why I have no interest in engaging with them. They simply don’t have the mental capacity to understand the concept of a “rate” or how it absolutely and always applies to anything that changes over time.

Vox Day #dunning-kruger voxday.net

My critiques, or rather, my conclusive and comprehensive mathematical disproofs, of evolution are not wrong, period, as anyone who is sufficiently competent to comprehend both the math and its correct context will soon grasp. Whether they tell her the truth or not remains to be seen. We’ve already seen that the first population geneticist who reached out to her provided her with information that was both a) incorrect and b) irrelevant.

It’s probably best that Ericka runs away now, considering what happened to the last woman who tried to debate me. For those of you who weren’t around then, she literally abandoned the debate after three rounds and ran off to Las Vegas to start a new career as a prostitute at a legal brothel. I’m neither kidding nor exaggerating for effect. You can look it up. You can probably still buy her services, for that matter.

It doesn’t matter in the least. The historical events of the last six million years already took place. They don’t depend upon me. Natural selection never produced homo sapiens sapiens. It never produced any species. And neither did genetic drift, neutral substitution, ILS, sweeps, ancestral polymorphism, or any other undirected mechanism for transferring genetic data that these desperate post-Darwinist polythesists can dream up.

It is perhaps worth noting that the very nice Christian anti-evolution crowd aren’t necessarily any more enthusiastic about my reputation than the I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE crowd, although it’s understandable that the evolutionists might be just a little more sensitive about anything that smacks of the historical political application of their pseudo-scientific beliefs, and yet the mathematicians in their midst take what I’ve developed very seriously because it is really that serious.

Here’s the thing: I don’t even care about evolution anymore. It’s dead, done, and dusted, and little Ericka and her enthusiasts can play with fairy tales and dinosaurs like toddlers all they like. It isn’t going to change anything, and there is no chance those midwitted retards were ever going to help solve the genomic catastrophe that they still haven’t noticed because they’re too busy doing makework and trying to find new ways to write “is consistent with the theory of evolution by natural selection”.

Vox Day #dunning-kruger voxday.net

The full paper is available on Zenodo. It is a tactical nuclear strike on both Neutral Theory as well as on the Postmodern Polythesis that many evolutionary biologists erroneously describe as “the Modern Synthesis”.

[…]

It has not been submitted to peer review for the obvious and observable reason that I have no peers.

Vox Day #conspiracy #crackpot dennismccarthy.substack.com

The recent studies that completed the first genomes have conclusively terminated Neo-Darwinism. The math was clear since 1966, but now the genetic evidence supports the math, and not the "mountains" of circumstantial evidence. Since the first of those studies were only published last year, it's understandable that it's going to take a decade or more for their consequences to percolate through the various scientific communities.

Do you ever wonder why all the alien talk by the government started up suddenly last year? My strong suspicion is that this is why. In 20 years, no one will believe in evolution as a human origin anymore, and the ironic thing is that most of you will deny you ever did.

I still remember when everyone thought I was crazy because I knew there was a government agency called the NSA. Now they've all forgotten they ever denied its existence.

We'll see. If I'm correct, you're going to see more and more science gradually moving in that direction.

Nathan #dunning-kruger dennismccarthy.substack.com

I'd be willing to bet that your "mountains of evidence from (paleontology, comparative anatomy, geology, and molecular biology)" is just so much question-begging. If your field assumes evolution and builds on top of it, evolution is not thereby proven. It remains an assumption.

The fact of micro-evolution (which was well known via breeding of domestic animals before anyone had heard of Darwin) does not prove macro-evolution. Your hand-waving is not evidence of anything.

Your sloppy, illogical reasoning is clear to everyone outside your cult. It goes back to Darwin, in fact, probably the most muddle-headed (alleged) scientist ever to have lived. Until you can master elementary logical reasoning, you should give up any ambition scientific theorizing.

Vox Day #conspiracy #dunning-kruger #crackpot dennismccarthy.substack.com

I don't even have an opinion on aliens; I tend to suspect that whatever the government ends up presenting to us is really going to be the demon-gods they've worshipped for millennia. We're learning that the world is a much weirder place than we'd been taught, or even imagined.

But I understand the relevant math on a level that very few, if any, biologists do. And so I know, beyond any shadow of even a flickering doubt, that the entire Neo-Darwinian edifice of the last 180 years is completely and totally false. And that's why every new discovery on every scientific front is going to make that more and more obvious, and less and less deniable.

Vox Day #dunning-kruger voxday.net

There is a reason that economists are inordinately inclined to be dubious about evolution. And that reason is this: we comprehend large numbers. For all the flaws of our field, and believe me, they are many, there isn’t a single economist who is impressed by a biologist waving his hand and summoning “millions and billions of years” or dramatically declaring that 600,000 generations is but “an eyeblink” in the context of geological time.

We work in trillions, bitch.

So waving your hand and imagining that the mere evocation of ONE MILLION YEARS allows sufficient time for anything and everything to happen not only doesn’t impress us, it confirms our original impression that you are actually retarded. I mean, when your core argument is, quite literally, an Austin Powers joke about inflation in a 1997 movie, you should probably consider the very high degree of probability that your entire hypothesis is not only ill-founded, but obviously wrong.

Evolution by natural selection never happened because it is mathematically impossible. And if you don’t accept that, it is only because you don’t understand the relevant math.

Vox Day #conspiracy #crackpot voxday.net

[Genuinely curious: does vox day suggest any alternative explanation for the phenomena that Darwin’s theory explains ?]

Intelligent Genetic Manipulation. We have no idea by whom. But I suspect all the recent alien disclosure stuff is because it is fairly obvious that the genetic record is going to prove that the human species, at the very least, was constructed. With a few more advancements in genetic science, we may even be able to figure out more or less when it happened.

The uncomfortable thing for everyone, creationist and evolutionist alike, is that the range of genetic variance is also likely to show that humanity is more than one species, constructed at different times. Because neither natural selection nor genetic drift can be responsible for it.

That sounds absolutely crazy, I know. But that’s what the evidence is currently suggesting. And the bigger problem is that natural selection hasn’t been performing its real function, keeping the genome from degrading, since around 1800. This is probably the real reason for the observed decline in human fertility, not microplastics or climate change.

John C. Wright #conspiracy disqus.com

Myself, I knew it was fake from the get go. I read the bewildered account of one of the guest speakers of Charlottesville after the riot, where he said the tiki torch brigade was not part of the planned event. No one he knew knew who these guys where or where they came from.

When the murder charge was pinned on a motorcar driver trying to escape the rent-a-mob brought in by the county government to stir up trouble, and this death was blamed on Trump, then I knew it was all fake, a set up, a false flag.

My suspicion was confirmed when Trump's statement during a Press conference (where lefty newsdogs kept shouting him down, so that his answers could not be heard) unambiguously and forcefully denounced the neonazis was reported as support for neonazis -- by claiming that when he spoke of those who wanted to keep a statue of a civil war hero versus tear it down, he said that controversy had very fine people on both sides.

The Dems repeated this lie, knowing it was a lie, tirelessly. That was when I began to suspect Dem are possessed by devils. Human beings get tired after a while. Devils have unnatural endurance. Devils never sleep.

Vox Day #dunning-kruger zenodo.org

Abstract
The Christian doctrine of Original Sin predicts that every human being deviates
from the moral law universally and without exception. This paper tests that
prediction against the published behavioral data. Using peer-reviewed research
on lying, lustful ideation, anger, envy, dishonesty, and gossip, we establish a
conservative floor estimate of 4.33 discrete sins per person per day and construct
the empirical distribution of daily sin rates across the population. We then
calculate the probability that any human being in the history of the species has
achieved a lifetime sin rate of zero. The result is conclusive. The probability is on
the order of 10⁻⁸⁴·¹⁴⁵, which means that a sinless human life is a 623-sigma event
across a total historical population of approximately 112 billion individuals. The
Augustinian doctrine is confirmed with 124.5x the certainty of the existence of the
Higgs boson: the distribution of human sinfulness makes a naturally sinless
human an absolute mathematical impossibility. Pelagius is refuted not by
theology but by the left tail of the sin distribution. The one historical exception,
Jesus of Nazareth, constitutes a statistical anomaly so extreme that it requires an
explanation outside the mathematical distribution.

Chris #conspiracy amazon.com

When you think about evolution in any critical way you start hearing a bunch of things that sound fairly improbable based on the ever changing time frames of the "age of the earth" and various other things that don't add up mathematically. It's like when I saw 9/11 happening in real time and realized that the story being told was not what actually occurred. Years later, a business and engineering degree behind, I now have some knowledge to fill in the gaps about what actually happened there. This book provides the actual math behind what is required for the mainstream theory of evolution by natural selection to be either proven true or falsified. Turns out that the Darwinists are Bernie Madoff and Vox Day is the SEC/FBI. Only this fraud has way more victims and way more perpetrators. It will likely shake a lot of cages and rile a lot of people up. Good. We need more people like Vox who aren't controlled by government grants or other entities that speak actual facts to power. It's refreshing to be alive in an era where a lot of the nonsense is getting the sunlight disinfectant it needs. Obviously you should read this book and it should be required reading for anyone who has critical thinking skills. Well done Vox even if the Mexicans were able to make demon rats with zero intelligence required.

Vox Day #dunning-kruger treeofwoe.substack.com

You're literally retarded. Peer review is both a) totally worthless and b) far less effective than AI stress-testing.

The rigor in Probability Zero [Vox Day’s anti-evolution book] exceeds the rigor in any biology book ever published. Run the numbers yourself. Doesn't matter which AI you use. They'll all tell you the same thing: the case is closed.

Vox Day #conspiracy voxday.net

This is where logical heuristics like Ockham’s Razor shine. If it seems as if there are multiple versions of the man, that is because there are multiple body doubles being utilized by different political factions.

Consider the possibilities explaining the various inconsistencies and anomalies observed:

Donald Trump is crazy
Donald Trump is pretending to be crazy
Donald Trump tells different audiences different things in public.
Donald Trump is being controlled by Benjamin Netanyahu/Xi Jinping/Vladimir Putin
The warring political factions in the USA are utilizing different political decoys.

Now, if one considers that the use of body doubles goes back to the time of The Iliad, when Patroclus rallied the Greeks by wearing the armor of Achilles, combined with the fact that Josef Stalin and British general Bernard Montgomery are both confirmed to have utilized body doubles in the 1940s, what is the most reasonable answer to the questions concerning President Trump’s incessant inconsistencies?

Vox Day #dunning-kruger amazon.com

When you look at the number of epicycles that have been added to
Neo-Darwinian theory, when you look at the amount of fraud, when you
look at the total incompetence demonstrated when it comes to statistics and
when it comes to arithmetic, there is no way that any of this should be taken
seriously. You shouldn’t be taking it any more seriously than you do a
newspaper horoscope.
The biologists are terrified of real science. Why? Because real science
falsifies bad theories.
Evolutionary biologists do study after study that purports to denote
significant statistical findings and then claim that the results are “consistent
with evolution by natural selection.” But remember, they don’t understand
statistics. They don’t understand probability. And they definitely don’t
understand logic.
The real statistics show that the probabilities of natural selection
explaining any significant genetic differences, let alone all of them it is
supposed to explain, are so low that the so-called Modern Synthesis is
simply not credible anymore.