@OQ83

John C. Wright #conspiracy disqus.com

Myself, I knew it was fake from the get go. I read the bewildered account of one of the guest speakers of Charlottesville after the riot, where he said the tiki torch brigade was not part of the planned event. No one he knew knew who these guys where or where they came from.

When the murder charge was pinned on a motorcar driver trying to escape the rent-a-mob brought in by the county government to stir up trouble, and this death was blamed on Trump, then I knew it was all fake, a set up, a false flag.

My suspicion was confirmed when Trump's statement during a Press conference (where lefty newsdogs kept shouting him down, so that his answers could not be heard) unambiguously and forcefully denounced the neonazis was reported as support for neonazis -- by claiming that when he spoke of those who wanted to keep a statue of a civil war hero versus tear it down, he said that controversy had very fine people on both sides.

The Dems repeated this lie, knowing it was a lie, tirelessly. That was when I began to suspect Dem are possessed by devils. Human beings get tired after a while. Devils have unnatural endurance. Devils never sleep.

Vox Day #dunning-kruger zenodo.org

Abstract
The Christian doctrine of Original Sin predicts that every human being deviates
from the moral law universally and without exception. This paper tests that
prediction against the published behavioral data. Using peer-reviewed research
on lying, lustful ideation, anger, envy, dishonesty, and gossip, we establish a
conservative floor estimate of 4.33 discrete sins per person per day and construct
the empirical distribution of daily sin rates across the population. We then
calculate the probability that any human being in the history of the species has
achieved a lifetime sin rate of zero. The result is conclusive. The probability is on
the order of 10⁻⁸⁴·¹⁴⁵, which means that a sinless human life is a 623-sigma event
across a total historical population of approximately 112 billion individuals. The
Augustinian doctrine is confirmed with 124.5x the certainty of the existence of the
Higgs boson: the distribution of human sinfulness makes a naturally sinless
human an absolute mathematical impossibility. Pelagius is refuted not by
theology but by the left tail of the sin distribution. The one historical exception,
Jesus of Nazareth, constitutes a statistical anomaly so extreme that it requires an
explanation outside the mathematical distribution.

Chris #conspiracy amazon.com

When you think about evolution in any critical way you start hearing a bunch of things that sound fairly improbable based on the ever changing time frames of the "age of the earth" and various other things that don't add up mathematically. It's like when I saw 9/11 happening in real time and realized that the story being told was not what actually occurred. Years later, a business and engineering degree behind, I now have some knowledge to fill in the gaps about what actually happened there. This book provides the actual math behind what is required for the mainstream theory of evolution by natural selection to be either proven true or falsified. Turns out that the Darwinists are Bernie Madoff and Vox Day is the SEC/FBI. Only this fraud has way more victims and way more perpetrators. It will likely shake a lot of cages and rile a lot of people up. Good. We need more people like Vox who aren't controlled by government grants or other entities that speak actual facts to power. It's refreshing to be alive in an era where a lot of the nonsense is getting the sunlight disinfectant it needs. Obviously you should read this book and it should be required reading for anyone who has critical thinking skills. Well done Vox even if the Mexicans were able to make demon rats with zero intelligence required.

Vox Day #dunning-kruger treeofwoe.substack.com

You're literally retarded. Peer review is both a) totally worthless and b) far less effective than AI stress-testing.

The rigor in Probability Zero [Vox Day’s anti-evolution book] exceeds the rigor in any biology book ever published. Run the numbers yourself. Doesn't matter which AI you use. They'll all tell you the same thing: the case is closed.

Vox Day #conspiracy voxday.net

This is where logical heuristics like Ockham’s Razor shine. If it seems as if there are multiple versions of the man, that is because there are multiple body doubles being utilized by different political factions.

Consider the possibilities explaining the various inconsistencies and anomalies observed:

Donald Trump is crazy
Donald Trump is pretending to be crazy
Donald Trump tells different audiences different things in public.
Donald Trump is being controlled by Benjamin Netanyahu/Xi Jinping/Vladimir Putin
The warring political factions in the USA are utilizing different political decoys.

Now, if one considers that the use of body doubles goes back to the time of The Iliad, when Patroclus rallied the Greeks by wearing the armor of Achilles, combined with the fact that Josef Stalin and British general Bernard Montgomery are both confirmed to have utilized body doubles in the 1940s, what is the most reasonable answer to the questions concerning President Trump’s incessant inconsistencies?

Vox Day #dunning-kruger amazon.com

When you look at the number of epicycles that have been added to
Neo-Darwinian theory, when you look at the amount of fraud, when you
look at the total incompetence demonstrated when it comes to statistics and
when it comes to arithmetic, there is no way that any of this should be taken
seriously. You shouldn’t be taking it any more seriously than you do a
newspaper horoscope.
The biologists are terrified of real science. Why? Because real science
falsifies bad theories.
Evolutionary biologists do study after study that purports to denote
significant statistical findings and then claim that the results are “consistent
with evolution by natural selection.” But remember, they don’t understand
statistics. They don’t understand probability. And they definitely don’t
understand logic.
The real statistics show that the probabilities of natural selection
explaining any significant genetic differences, let alone all of them it is
supposed to explain, are so low that the so-called Modern Synthesis is
simply not credible anymore.