I'd be willing to bet that your "mountains of evidence from (paleontology, comparative anatomy, geology, and molecular biology)" is just so much question-begging. If your field assumes evolution and builds on top of it, evolution is not thereby proven. It remains an assumption.

The fact of micro-evolution (which was well known via breeding of domestic animals before anyone had heard of Darwin) does not prove macro-evolution. Your hand-waving is not evidence of anything.

Your sloppy, illogical reasoning is clear to everyone outside your cult. It goes back to Darwin, in fact, probably the most muddle-headed (alleged) scientist ever to have lived. Until you can master elementary logical reasoning, you should give up any ambition scientific theorizing.